Biomechanical analysis of recently released cephalomedullary nails for trochanteric femoral fracture fixation in a human cadaveric model

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Torsten Pastor ◽  
Ivan Zderic ◽  
Dominic Gehweiler ◽  
Michael J. Gardner ◽  
Karl Stoffel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Fixation ◽  
Femoral Fracture ◽  
Biomechanical Analysis ◽  
Trochanteric Femoral Fracture ◽  
Cadaveric Model ◽  
Cephalomedullary Nails

Optimising the tip-apex-distance in trochanteric femoral fracture fixation using the ADAPT-navigated technique, a longitudinal matched cohort study

Injury ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (3) ◽  
pp. 744-751 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Herzog ◽  
Robert Wendlandt ◽  
Sebastian Hillbricht ◽  
Rainer Burgkart ◽  
Arndt-Peter Schulz
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Fracture Fixation ◽  
Femoral Fracture ◽  
Matched Cohort ◽  
Matched Cohort Study ◽  
Trochanteric Femoral Fracture ◽  
Tip Apex Distance

Biomechanical analysis of distal femoral fracture fixation: dynamic condylar screw versus locked compression plate

2014 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 770-775 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nidhi Narsaria ◽  
Ashutosh K. Singh ◽  
Amit Rastogi ◽  
Vakil Singh
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Fixation ◽  
Femoral Fracture ◽  
Biomechanical Analysis ◽  
Distal Femoral Fracture ◽  
Dynamic Condylar Screw ◽  
Compression Plate

scholarly journals Effect of Screw Diameter in Femoral Fracture Fixation Modeled by Finite Element Method

2017 ◽  
Vol 0 (2) ◽  
pp. 173
Author(s):  
Muhammad Nashrullah ◽  
Belladina Clara Shinta ◽  
Mas Irfan P. Hidayat ◽  
Agung Purniawan ◽  
Yuli Setiyorini
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Method ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Fracture Fixation ◽  
Femoral Fracture ◽  
Screw Diameter ◽  
Element Method

Comprehensive Biomechanical Analysis of Three Lumbopelvic Reconstruction Techniques following Total Sacrectomy: An In Vitro Human Cadaveric Model

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (10) ◽  
pp. S161
Author(s):  
Bryan W. Cunningham ◽  
Mohamad Bydon ◽  
Ashley A. Murgatroyd ◽  
Kenneth Mullinix ◽  
Ziya L. Gokaslan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Biomechanical Analysis ◽  
Total Sacrectomy ◽  
Cadaveric Model

Design-optimization and material selection for a femoral-fracture fixation-plate implant

2010 ◽  
Vol 31 (7) ◽  
pp. 3463-3473 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Grujicic ◽  
G. Arakere ◽  
X. Xie ◽  
M. LaBerge ◽  
A. Grujicic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Design Optimization ◽  
Fracture Fixation ◽  
Femoral Fracture ◽  
Material Selection ◽  
Fixation Plate ◽  
Selection For

Femoral Fracture Fixation in Developing Countries: An Evaluation of the Surgical Implant Generation Network (SIGN) Intramedullary Nail

2011 ◽  
Vol 93 (19) ◽  
pp. 1811-1818 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Sekimpi ◽  
Kanu Okike ◽  
Lewis Zirkle ◽  
Andrew Jawa
Keyword(s):  
Developing Countries ◽  
Intramedullary Nail ◽  
Fracture Fixation ◽  
Femoral Fracture ◽  
Surgical Implant ◽  
Generation Network

EFFECTS OF INTRAMEDULLARY FEMORAL FRACTURE FIXATION: WHAT IS THE IMPACT OF EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES IN REGARDS TO THE CLINICAL KNOWLEDGE?

Shock ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 291-300 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans-Christoph Pape ◽  
Peter V. Giannoudis ◽  
Kai Grimme ◽  
Martijn van Griensven ◽  
Christian Krettek
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Fixation ◽  
Femoral Fracture ◽  
Experimental Studies ◽  
Clinical Knowledge ◽  
The Impact

PULMONARY RESPONSE IN HYPOVOLEMIC SHOCK, LUNG CONTUSION AND FEMORAL FRACTURE FIXATION

Shock ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 12 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. 49 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Kröpfl ◽  
U. Berger ◽  
H. Redl ◽  
G. Schlag ◽  
H. Hertz
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Fixation ◽  
Femoral Fracture ◽  
Hypovolemic Shock ◽  
Lung Contusion ◽  
Pulmonary Response ◽  
Shock Lung

Biomechanical Analysis of Glenohumeral Internal Rotation Deficit in a Cadaveric Model

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akash Gupta ◽  
Jeffrey Gates ◽  
Michelle H. McGarry ◽  
James E. Tibone ◽  
Thay Q. Lee
Keyword(s):  
Internal Rotation ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Glenohumeral Joint ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Biomechanical Analysis ◽  
Glenohumeral Internal Rotation Deficit ◽  
Posterior Translation ◽  
Throwers Shoulder ◽  
Cadaveric Model

Overhead throwing athletes have been shown to develop adaptive changes in humeral rotation to allow for higher throwing velocities. This manifests as an increase in humeral external rotation and a decrease in internal rotation, which is called glenohumeral internal rotation deficit (GIRD). The percentage of GIRD that significantly affects glenohumeral joint kinematics is not known. The objective of the study was to create a throwers shoulder model with fixed percentages of GIRD to determine at which point kinematic changes start occurring. The results showed that there was a significant decrease in posterior translation starting at 10% GIRD. With inferior translational loads, significantly less inferior translation starts occurring at 20% GIRD. The humeral head apex position at maximum external rotation moves superiorly, posteriorly and laterally, with significant changes in the superior direction occurring with 10% GIRD onwards. Overall, significant kinematic changes begin at 10% GIRD and this should be taken into account for clinical decision-making as to when intervention is necessary.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document