Forensic age estimation by the Schmeling method: computed tomography analysis of the medial clavicular epiphysis

2014 ◽  
Vol 129 (1) ◽  
pp. 203-210 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oguzhan Ekizoglu ◽  
Elif Hocaoglu ◽  
Ercan Inci ◽  
Ibrahim Sayin ◽  
Dilek Solmaz ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (5) ◽  
pp. 1415-1425 ◽  
Author(s):  
Coralie Hermetet ◽  
Pauline Saint-Martin ◽  
Arsène Gambier ◽  
Léo Ribier ◽  
Bénédicte Sautenet ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 62 (2) ◽  
pp. 292-307 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolene Lottering ◽  
Clair L. Alston-Knox ◽  
Donna M. MacGregor ◽  
Maree T. Izatt ◽  
Caroline A. Grant ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Magdalini Tozakidou ◽  
Rieke L. Meister ◽  
Lennart Well ◽  
Kay U. Petersen ◽  
Sebastian Schindera ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose The aim of this study was to assess the impact of arm position in computed tomography (CT) of the clavicle performed for forensic age estimation on clavicular position, image noise, and radiation dose. Methods and materials Forty-seven CT scans of the medial clavicular epiphysis performed for forensic age estimation were conducted with either hands and arms held upwards (CTHU, 28 persons) or positioned at the body (CTHD, 19 persons). Presets were identical for both positions (70 mAs/140 kVp; Brilliance iCT, Philips). Each CT scan was reconstructed with an iterative algorithm (i-Dose 4) and evaluated at the middle of the sternoclavicular joint. Clavicular angle was measured on a.p. topograms in relation to a horizontal line. Quantitative image noise was measured in air at the level of medial clavicular epiphysis. Effective dose and scan length were recorded. Results Hands-up position compared with hands-down position resulted in a lower lateral body diameter (CTHU 41.1 ± 3.6 cm vs. CTHD 44.6 ± 3.1 cm; P = 0.03), a reduced quantitative image noise (CTHU: 39.5 ± 9.2; CTHD: 46.2 ± 8.3; P = 0.02), and lower CTDIvol (5.1 ± 1.4 mGy vs. 6.7 ± 1.8 mGy; P = 0.001). Scan length was longer in patients examined with hands up (HU: 8.5 ± 3.4 cm; HD: 6.2 ± 2.1 cm; P = 0.006). Mean effective dose for CTHU was 0.79 ± 0.32 mSv compared with 0.95 ± 0.38 mSv in CTHD (P = 0.12). Clavicular angle was 17° ± 6° in patients with hands down and 32° ± 7° in patients with hands up (P < 0.001). Conclusion By elevated arm positioning, the image quality of clavicular CT scans can be improved while maintaining radiation dose compared with hands down. Clavicular position differs according to the hand position. Thus, positioning patients with elevated hands is advisable for forensic clavicular CT examinations, but multiplanar CT reconstructions should be adjusted to clavicular position and scan length should be reduced to a minimum.


2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 1419-1426 ◽  
Author(s):  
Doaa A. El Morsi ◽  
Hend M Abo El-Atta ◽  
Merit ElMaadawy ◽  
Ahmed M Tawfik ◽  
Nihal M Batouty

2015 ◽  
Vol 246 ◽  
pp. 123.e1-123.e5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nuttaya Pattamapaspong ◽  
Chakri Madla ◽  
Karnda Mekjaidee ◽  
Sirianong Namwongprom

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document