Short-term outcomes of a modified technique for small-incision scleral-fixated intraocular lens implantation using Gore-Tex sutures

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ching-Wen Huang ◽  
Chia-Ying Tsai ◽  
Tso-Ting Lai
Keyword(s):  
Intraocular Lens ◽  
Intraocular Lens Implantation ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Modified Technique ◽  
Small Incision ◽  
Lens Implantation ◽  
Scleral Fixated Intraocular Lens

Results of scleral fixated intraocular lens implantation

2018 ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Ercan Ozsoy ◽  
Behice Duman ◽  
Abuzer Gunduz ◽  
Tongabay Cumurcu
Keyword(s):  
Intraocular Lens ◽  
Intraocular Lens Implantation ◽  
Lens Implantation ◽  
Scleral Fixated Intraocular Lens

scholarly journals Short Term Analysis of New Single-Piece Aspheric Diffractive Trifocal Intraocular Lens Implantation

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. B. Pershin ◽  
N. F. Pashinova ◽  
M. M. Konovalova ◽  
A. Yu. Tsygankov ◽  
M. E. Konovalov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intraocular Lens ◽  
High Efficiency ◽  
Cataract Extraction ◽  
Similar Data ◽  
Intraocular Lens Implantation ◽  
Preoperative Period ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Lens Implantation

Purpose. Evaluation of short-term (up to 9 months) results of new one-piece aspherical diffractive trifocal intraocular lens implantation. Patients and Methods. A prospective, open-label study included 65 patients (100 eyes) with presbyopia, who received cataract extraction with the implantation of a new IOL AcrySof PanOptix® trifocal. The average age of the patients was 60.0 ± 12.1 years. 35 patients underwent bilateral correction with multifocal IOLs, and 30 had a monolateral correction. In 21 % (n = 21) cases, femtolaser support of cataract extraction was performed. In 9 eyes (9 %) the primary posterior capsulorhexis was performed. The range of optical power of implanted IOLs was 13 to 30 D. The follow-up period was from 6 to 9 (6.8 ± 0.9) months.Results. On the 1 day after the MIOL implantation, an UCIVA increase was from 0.22 ± 0.19 to 0.76 ± 0.23 (p < 0.05), at follow-up to 6 months up to 0.85 ± 0.22. One day after surgery, the UCIVA increased from 0.23 ± 0.19 to 0.7 ± 0.25 (p < 0.05), with following raise up to 0.84 ± 0.24 in the maximum follow-up period of 6 months. UCFVA in the preoperative period was 0.27 ± 0.23, with an increase to 0.78 ± 0.23 (p < 0.05) for 1 day and 0.93 ± 0.18 at 6 months. The BCNVA increase was from 0.56 ± 0.25 before surgery to 0.8 ± 0.19 on the 1st day after cataract removal (p < 0.05) and 0.98 ± 0.16 at the 6 months follow-up period. Similar data (0.58 ± 0.29, 0.82 ± 0.21, and 0.95 ± 0.14) was noted for BCIVA. An BCFVA increase was from 0.71 ± 0.28 in the preoperative period to 1.0 ± 0.04 (p < 0.05) after 6 months. The primary endpoint of the study (BCFVA = 1.0) in the group was achieved in 83 % of cases (n = 83). The effect of glare was noted in 17 patients (26.1 %), halo in 9 (13.8 %), driving difficulties in 6 (9.2 %). The overwhelming majority of patients (96.9 %) rated the result of the operation as “excellent” (n = 51, 78.5 %) and “good” (n = 14, 21.5 %).Conclusion. Implantation of the examined IOL is associated with a high efficiency for near, intermediate distance and far vision correction. A new trifocal IOL may be recommended for use in clinical practice. Further comparative studies including other multifocal IOLs are needed to determine the indications and contraindications for its implantation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document