AbstractBackgroundObjective markers of cardiac function are limited in the outpatient setting and may be beneficial for monitoring patients with chronic cardiac conditions.ObjectiveWe assess the accuracy of a scale, with the ability to capture ballistocardiography, electrocardiography, and impedance plethysmography signals from a patient’s feet while standing on the scale, in measuring stroke volume and cardiac output compared to the gold-standard direct Fick method.MethodsThirty-two patients with unexplained dyspnea undergoing level 3 invasive cardiopulmonary exercise test at a tertiary medical center were included in the final analysis. We obtained scale and direct Fick measurements of stroke volume and cardiac output before and immediately after invasive cardiopulmonary exercise test.ResultsStroke volume and cardiac output from a cardiac scale and the direct Fick method correlated with r = 0.81 and r = 0.85, respectively (P < 0.001 each). The mean absolute error of the scale estimated stroke volume was -1.58 mL, with a 95% limits of agreement (LOA) of -21.97 mL to 18.81 mL. The mean error for the scale estimated cardiac output was -0.31 L/min, with a 95% LOA of -2.62 L/min to 2.00 L/min. The change in stroke volume and cardiac output before and after exercise were 78.9% and 96.7% concordant, respectively between the two measuring methods.ConclusionsThis novel scale with cardiac monitoring abilities may allow for non-invasive, longitudinal measures of cardiac function. Using the widely accepted form factor of a bathroom scale, this method of monitoring can be easily integrated into a patient’s lifestyle.
Non-Invasive Scale Measurement of Cardiac Output Compared with the Gold-Standard Direct Fick Method: A Feasibility Study
