scholarly journals Robotic versus laparoscopic anterior resection of sigmoid colon cancer: comparative study of long-term oncologic outcomes

2012 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 1379-1385 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dae Ro Lim ◽  
Byung Soh Min ◽  
Min Sung Kim ◽  
Sami Alasari ◽  
Gangmi Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Sigmoid Colon ◽  
Anterior Resection ◽  
Oncologic Outcomes ◽  
Sigmoid Colon Cancer ◽  
Laparoscopic Anterior Resection

scholarly journals Niti CAR 27 Versus a Conventional End-to-End Anastomosis Stapler in a Laparoscopic Anterior Resection for Sigmoid Colon Cancer

2014 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seung-Jin Kwag ◽  
Jun-Gi Kim ◽  
Won-Kyung Kang ◽  
Jin-Kwon Lee ◽  
Seong-Taek Oh
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Sigmoid Colon ◽  
Anterior Resection ◽  
Sigmoid Colon Cancer ◽  
Laparoscopic Anterior Resection ◽  
End To End

Learning Curve for Single-Incision Laparoscopic Anterior Resection for Sigmoid Colon Cancer

2015 ◽  
Vol 221 (2) ◽  
pp. 397-403 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chang Woo Kim ◽  
Woo Ram Kim ◽  
Ha Yan Kim ◽  
Jeonghyun Kang ◽  
Hyuk Hur ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Learning Curve ◽  
Sigmoid Colon ◽  
Anterior Resection ◽  
Single Incision ◽  
Sigmoid Colon Cancer ◽  
Laparoscopic Anterior Resection

scholarly journals Trans-rectal natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) during laparoscopic anterior resection: Chinese experience with a novel method

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhu-Qing Zhou ◽  
Kai-Jing Wang ◽  
Tao Du ◽  
Wei Gao ◽  
Zhe Zhu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Sigmoid Colon ◽  
Anterior Resection ◽  
Sigmoid Colon Cancer ◽  
Natural Orifice ◽  
Specimen Extraction ◽  
Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction ◽  
Laparoscopic Anterior Resection ◽  
Novel Method

Abstract Background: To introduce a novel method for double stapling technique in colorectal anastomosis during laparoscopic anterior resection of upper rectal or sigmoid colon cancer with trans-rectal natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE). Methods: From June 2015 and May 2016, patients with upper-rectal or sigmoid colon cancer who received treatment in Shanghai East Hospital were enrolled. Preoperative and postoperative clinical variables were analyzed and compared between groups. Postoperative pain was analyzed utilizing a visual analog scale (VAS). Postoperative overall survival was analyzed using a K-M curve. Results: A total of 99 colorectal cancer cases were randomly divided into NOSE with novel method group (NOSE, n=48) and conventional laparoscopic group (non-NOSE, n=51). No statistically significant differences in preoperative demographics of the patients as sex, age, body mass index were found among the groups. The NOSE group had the longer operation time, but less blood loss than the non-NOSE group. The NOSE group had no abdominal incision and the lower postoperative VAS score. The time for intestinal function recovery and the length of hospital stay (LOS) was statistically significantly different, with the non-NOSE group having the longer time. The incidence of postoperative complications was lower in NOSE group (5/48, 10.4%) than in the non-NOSE group (8/51, 15.7%), the difference was statistically significant. The K-M survival curve showed no statistically significant difference in the disease free survival rate between the NOSE group and non-NOSE group. Conclusion: NOSE with novel method is safe and feasible to use in patients having colorectal cancer. Compared with traditional laparoscopic surgery, the postoperative complication rates of NOSE surgery were lower with an improved short-term clinical recovery.

scholarly journals Impact of proximal resection margins on oncologic outcomes for patients with sigmoid colon cancer

2013 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 124-128
Author(s):  
Won Bum Jung ◽  
In Ja Park ◽  
Kwon Sik Kim ◽  
Chang Sik Yu ◽  
Seok-Byung Lim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Sigmoid Colon ◽  
Oncologic Outcomes ◽  
Sigmoid Colon Cancer ◽  
Resection Margins
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document