Endoscopic submucosal dissection of large polyps in the right colon using an endoscopic snare with a double-balloon endolumenal interventional platform: an ex vivo study in a porcine colorectal model

Author(s):  
Shinya Urakawa ◽  
Kota Momose ◽  
Teijiro Hirashita ◽  
Lea Lowenfeld ◽  
Jeffrey W. Milsom
Endoscopy ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 51 (12) ◽  
pp. E364-E365
Author(s):  
Jérémie Jacques ◽  
Jérémie Albouys ◽  
Anne Guyot ◽  
Sophie Geyl ◽  
Romain Legros ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 663-668 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akira Dobashi ◽  
Andrew C. Storm ◽  
Louis M. Wong Kee Song ◽  
Christopher J. Gostout ◽  
Jodie L. Deters ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 141
Author(s):  
Haruka Fujinami ◽  
Akira Teramoto ◽  
Saeko Takahashi ◽  
Takayuki Ando ◽  
Shinya Kajiura ◽  
...  

This study aimed to assess the utility of the S-O clip during colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). We conducted a retrospective study on 185 patients who underwent colorectal ESD from January 2015 to January 2020. The patients were divided into two groups: before and after the introduction of the S-O clip. Forty-two patients underwent conventional ESD (CO group) and 29 patients underwent ESD using the S-O clip (SO group). We compared the surgery duration, dissection speed, en bloc resection rate, and complication rate between both groups. Compared with the CO group, the SO group had a significantly shorter surgery duration (70.7 ± 37.9 min vs. 51.2 ± 18.6 min; p = 0.017), a significantly higher dissection speed (15.1 ± 9.0 min vs. 26.3 ± 13.8 min; p < 0.001), a significantly higher en bloc resection rate (80.9% vs. 98.8%; p ≤ 0.001), and a significantly lower perforation rate (4.3% vs. 1.3%). In the right colon, the surgery duration was significantly shorter and the dissection speed was significantly higher in the SO group than in the CO group. Moreover, the rate of en bloc resection improved significantly in the right colon. S-O clip-assisted ESD reduces the procedure time and improves the treatment effects, especially in the right colon.


2010 ◽  
Vol 72 (1) ◽  
pp. 155-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suck-Ho Lee ◽  
Mark A. Gromski ◽  
Alexandre Derevianko ◽  
Daniel B. Jones ◽  
Douglas K. Pleskow ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shinya Urakawa ◽  
Teijiro Hirashita ◽  
Yuka Hirashita ◽  
Lea Lowenfeld ◽  
Krishna Gurram ◽  
...  

Abstract Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is challenging in the right colon. Traction devices can make it technically easier. In this study, we evaluated a flexible grasper with articulating tip and elbow-like bending (IgE) through a double-balloon surgical platform (DESP), compared with an earlier generation grasper without elbow-like bending (Ig). The reach of Ig/IgE was investigated at eight locations using a synthetic colon within a 3D model. Using a fresh porcine colorectum, 4 cm pseudo-polyps were created at the posterior wall of the ascending colon. Fifty-four ESD procedures were performed using three techniques: standard ESD (STD), ESD using Ig (DESP+Ig), and ESD using IgE (DESP+IgE). IgE was able to reach the full circumference at all the locations, whereas the medial walls proximal to the descending colon were out of Ig’s reach. Compared with the STD, both DESP+Ig and DESP+IgE showed significantly shorter procedure time (STD vs. DESP+Ig vs. DESP+IgE = median 48.9 min vs. 38.6 vs. 29.9) and fewer injuries (1.5 vs. 0 vs. 0). Moreover, the DESP+IgE had a shorter procedure time than the DESP+Ig (p=0.0025). The IgE with DESP increased instrument reach compared to Ig, and likely represented a traction tool for excision of large pseudo-polyps in the right colon.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document