Active treatment given in the last weeks of life: poor quality cancer care or justifiable behavior?

2014 ◽  
Vol 22 (10) ◽  
pp. 2813-2819 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gianmauro Numico ◽  
Antonio Trogu ◽  
Antonella Cristofano ◽  
Alessandro Mozzicafreddo ◽  
Giulia Courthod ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Chika R. Nwachukwu ◽  
Omobola Mudasiru ◽  
Lynn Million ◽  
Shruti Sheth ◽  
Hope Qamoos ◽  
...  

Purpose Despite recognition of both the growing cancer burden in low- and middle-income countries and the disproportionately high mortality rates in these settings, delivery of high-quality cancer care remains a challenge. The disparities in cancer care outcomes for many geographic regions result from barriers that are likely complex and understudied. This study describes the development and use of a streamlined needs assessment questionnaire (NAQ) to understand the barriers to providing quality cancer care, identifies areas for improvement, and formulates recommendations for implementation. Methods Using a comprehensive NAQ, in-depth interviews were conducted with 17 hospital staff involved in cancer care at two teaching hospitals in Nigeria. Data were analyzed using content analysis and organized into a framework with preset codes and emergent codes, where applicable. Results Data from the interviews were organized into six broad themes: staff, stuff, system, space, lack of palliative care, and provider bias, with key barriers within themes including: financial, infrastructural, lack of awareness, limited human capacity resources, lack of palliative care, and provider perspective on patient-related barriers to cancer care. Specific solutions based on ability to reasonably implement were subcategorized into short-, medium-, and long-term goals. Conclusion This study provides a framework for a streamlined initial needs assessment and a unique discussion on the barriers to high-quality oncology care that are prevalent in resource-constrained settings. We report the feasibility of collecting and organizing data using a streamlined NAQ and provide a thorough and in-depth understanding of the challenges in this setting. Knowledge gained from the assessments will inform steps to improve oncology cancer in these settings.


2009 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 318-327 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mokenge P. Malafa ◽  
Michelle M. Corman ◽  
David Shibata ◽  
Erin M. Siegel ◽  
Ji-Hyun Lee ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 10-10
Author(s):  
Matthew Farber

2017 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brad Zebrack ◽  
Karen Kayser ◽  
Julianne Oktay ◽  
Laura Sundstrom ◽  
Alison Mayer Sachs

1998 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 139-141
Author(s):  
Lydia Gonzalez-Ryan

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 400-404
Author(s):  
Terrell Johnson ◽  
Lindsey A.M. Bandini ◽  
Kara Martin ◽  
Lee Jones ◽  
Jennifer Carlson ◽  
...  

Health policy in America has shifted rapidly over the last decade, and states are increasingly exercising greater authority over health policy decision-making. This localization and regionalization of healthcare policy poses significant challenges for patients with cancer, providers, advocates, and policymakers. To identify the challenges and opportunities that lay ahead of stakeholders, NCCN hosted the 2019 Policy Summit: The State of Cancer Care in America on June 27, 2019, in Washington, DC. The summit featured multidisciplinary panel discussions to explore the implications for access to quality cancer care within a shifting health policy landscape from a patient, provider, and lawmaker perspective. This article encapsulates the discussion from this NCCN Policy Summit.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document