scholarly journals Adjuvant chemotherapy for resectable biliary tract cancer: current status and future direction

2012 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 301-305 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masaru Konishi
Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 252
Author(s):  
Shunsuke Kato

The prognosis of patients with solid tumours has remarkably improved with the development of molecular-targeted drugs and immune checkpoint inhibitors. However, the improvements in the prognosis of pancreatic cancer and biliary tract cancer is delayed compared to other carcinomas, and the 5-year survival rates of distal-stage disease are approximately 10 and 20%, respectively. However, a comprehensive analysis of tumour cells using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) project has led to the identification of various driver mutations. Evidently, few mutations exist across organs, and basket trials targeting driver mutations regardless of the primary organ are being actively conducted. Such basket trials not only focus on the gate keeper-type oncogene mutations, such as HER2 and BRAF, but also focus on the caretaker-type tumour suppressor genes, such as BRCA1/2, mismatch repair-related genes, which cause hereditary cancer syndrome. As oncogene panel testing is a vital approach in routine practice, clinicians should devise a strategy for improved understanding of the cancer genome. Here, the gene mutation profiles of pancreatic cancer and biliary tract cancer have been outlined and the current status of tumour-agnostic therapy in these cancers has been reported.


2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 894-899 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kohei Nakachi ◽  
Masaru Konishi ◽  
Masafumi Ikeda ◽  
Kazuaki Shimada ◽  
Takuji Okusaka ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14614-e14614
Author(s):  
M. Lucchesi ◽  
E. Vasile ◽  
M. Lencioni ◽  
C. Caparello ◽  
S. Caponi ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 345-345
Author(s):  
Shin Nakahira ◽  
Shogo Kobayashi ◽  
Atsushi Miyamoto ◽  
Junzo Shimizu ◽  
Masaki Kashiwazaki ◽  
...  

345 Background: Resection of biliary tract cancer, employing pancreatoduodenectomy and major hepatectomy, is highly aggressive. Thus, postoperative gemcitabine cannot be administered employing a routine dosage protocol. We theorized that a 3-weekly protocol (days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks) of gemcitabine as adjuvant chemotherapy would be superior to the usually administered 4-weekly protocol (days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks). Methods: The outcomes of 6 cycles of the 4-weekly protocol and 9 cycles of the 3-weekly protocol were compared in a prospective randomized clinical setting. The primary endpoint was the treatment completion rate, while secondary endpoints were adverse events and recurrence-free survival. Results: We enrolled a total of 27 patients. Only two patients (14%) on the 4-weekly protocol and three (23%) on the 3-weekly protocol (p=0.8099) completed treatment with no omissions and/or dose modifications. Most of the remaining patients (70%) experienced grade 3/4 neutropenia. Relative dose intensities were 72% and 78%, respectively, with the 4-weekly and 3-weekly protocols. Recurrence-free survival rates did not differ significantly between the two protocols. Conclusions: Contrary to our hypothesis, the 3-weekly protocol did not produce superior results in terms of completion, adverse events or recurrence-free survival rates as compared to the standard 4-week protocol.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document