Answer to the Letter to the Editor of Ming Yang et al. concerning “Risk factors of new symptomatic vertebral compression fractures in osteoporotic patients undergone percutaneous vertebroplasty” by Ren HL et al. (2015) Eur Spine J;24(4):750–758

2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 1561-1563
Author(s):  
Hai-long Ren
2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 030006052198946
Author(s):  
Xiaoguang Fan ◽  
Sha Li ◽  
Xianshang Zeng ◽  
Weiguang Yu ◽  
Xiangzhen Liu

Objective To explore possible risk factors for poor outcomes following percutaneous vertebroplasty (PV) for painful osteoporotic compression fractures of thoracolumbar vertebra. Methods This was a retrospective review of data from patients who underwent PV at our institution over a ten-year period to evaluate the association between possible risk factors and thoracolumbar pain (T11-L2). According to the difference between pre- and post-operative visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for pain, patients were separated into poor relief (PR; <4) and good relief (GR; ≥4) of pain. Results Of the 750 patients identified, 630 (PR group, n =310; GR group, n = 320) fulfilled the eligibility criteria. Multivariate binary logistic analysis showed that bone mineral density (BMD), >2 fractured vertebral bodies, maldistribution of bone cement, <5 ml bone cement injected into a single vertebral body and thoracolumbar fascia injury prior to surgery were independent risk factors associated with thoracolumbar pain following PV. Conclusion Although prospective controlled studies are required to confirm our results, this review suggests that the above factors should be taken into account when selecting patients for PV.


2015 ◽  
Vol 6;18 (6;11) ◽  
pp. E1047-E1057
Author(s):  
Gao-Jun Teng

Background: Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) is widely used for the treatment of painful vertebral compression fractures (VCFs). However, new VCFs occur frequently after PVP. Objectives: We aim to establish an objective risk score system to assess the possibility of new vertebral fractures in patients with VCFs undergoing PVP. Study Design: This study was a retrospective study, and it was approved by the Institutional Review Board of our 2 institutions. Setting: This study consists of patients from 2 large academic centers. Methods: Patients with VCFs who underwent their first PVP and met the inclusion criteria between January 2007 and December 2013 at Hospital A (training cohort) and Hospital B (validation cohort) were included. In the training cohort, the independent risk factors for new VCFs after PVP were identified by multivariate stepwise backward Cox regression analysis from the risk factors selected by univariate analysis and Harrell’s C-statistics and used to develop the score system (assessment for new VCFs after PVP [ANVCFV]) to predict the probability of new VCFs. Results: In total, 397 patients (training cohort: n = 241; validation cohort: n = 156) were included in this study. In the training cohort, the ANVCFV score was developed based on 5 independent risk factors for the new VCFs after PVP, including lower computed tomography (CT) values, pre-existing old VCFs, intradiscal cement leakage, more than one vertebra treated, and superior or inferior marginal cement distribution in the vertebra. The patients were divided into 2 groups by the ANVCFV score of -1.5 to 8.5 vs. > 8.5 points in the probability of new VCFs (median fracture-free time: 1846 vs. 732 days; P < 0.001) in the training cohort. The accuracy of this score system was 77.4% for the training cohort and 85.3% for the validation cohort. Limitations: The main limitations of this study are that it is a retrospective study and that there is a significant difference of the treated vertebrae of PVP per session between the 2 cohorts. Conclusion: Patients who underwent their first PVP with an ANVCFV score > 8.5 points may exhibit an increased chance of suffering from new VCFs. Key words: Vertebral compression fracture, percutaneous vertebroplasty, newly developed, risk factors, risk score system, Cox regression model, accuracy, validation


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document