Comparison of interventions and outcomes of enhanced recovery after surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 2456 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis cases

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Koucheki ◽  
Martin Koyle ◽  
George M. Ibrahim ◽  
Jeremie Nallet ◽  
David E. Lebel
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis ◽  
Idiopathic Scoliosis ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
Meta Analysis

Timely Revisit of Proprioceptive Deficits in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. 219256822110668
Author(s):  
Kenney K. L. Lau ◽  
Karlen K. P. Law ◽  
Kenny Y. H. Kwan ◽  
Jason P. Y. Cheung ◽  
Kenneth M. C. Cheung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis ◽  
Idiopathic Scoliosis ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Detection Threshold ◽  
Mean Difference ◽  
Case Control Studies ◽  
Meta Analyses

Study Design Systematic review and meta-analysis Objectives The present review aimed to summarize the evidence regarding differences in proprioception between children with and without adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Methods Seven electronic databases were searched from their inception to April 10, 2021. Articles were included if they involved: (1) AIS patients aged between 10 and 18 years, (2) measurements of proprioceptive abilities, and (3) comparisons with non-AIS controls. Animal studies, case reports, commentaries, conference proceedings, research protocols, and reviews were excluded. Two reviewers independently conducted literature screening, data extraction, risks of bias assessments, and quality of evidence evaluations. Relevant information was pooled for meta-analyses. Results From 432 identified citations, 11 case-control studies comprising 1121 participants were included. The meta-analyses showed that AIS participants displayed proprioceptive deficits as compared to non-AIS controls. Moderate evidence supported that AIS participants showed significantly larger repositioning errors than healthy controls (pooled mean difference = 1.27 degrees, P < .01). Low evidence substantiated that AIS participants had significantly greater motion detection threshold (pooled mean difference = 1.60 degrees, P < .01) and abnormal somatosensory evoked potentials (pooled mean difference = .36 milliseconds, P = .01) than non-AIS counterparts. Conclusions Consistent findings revealed that proprioceptive deficits occurred in AIS patients. Further investigations on the causal relationship between AIS and proprioception, and the identification of the subgroup of AIS patients with proprioceptive deficit are needed.

Outcomes of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) in Gynecologic Oncology—A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 76 (4) ◽  
pp. 202-203
Author(s):  
S. P. Bisch ◽  
C. A. Jago ◽  
E. Kalogera ◽  
H. Ganshorn ◽  
L. A. Meyer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Gynecologic Oncology

Enhanced recovery after surgery program for patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Pancreatology ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. S115
Author(s):  
Peter Szatmary ◽  
Junjie Xiong ◽  
Wei Huang ◽  
Chunlu Tan ◽  
Quentin Nunes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
Meta Analysis

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways in breast reconstruction: systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature

2018 ◽  
Vol 173 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anaeze C. Offodile ◽  
Cindy Gu ◽  
Stefanos Boukovalas ◽  
Christopher J. Coroneos ◽  
Abhishek Chatterjee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
Meta Analysis
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document