Management of scaphoid nonunions with vascularized bone grafts from the distal radius: mid- to long-term follow-up

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Konstantinos N. Malizos ◽  
Zoe Dailiana ◽  
Sokratis Varitimidis ◽  
Antonios Koutalos
2014 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 832-837
Author(s):  
Eiji Nakada ◽  
Shinsuke Sugihara ◽  
Toshiyuki Kunisada ◽  
Toshifumi Ozaki

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 589-599 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily Lalone ◽  
Joy MacDermid ◽  
Ruby Grewal ◽  
Graham King

Background: Fractures of the distal radius are common. Few studies investigating the extended long term outcomes of participants following a distal radius fracture (especially beyond 2 years) and they have relied on subjective measures or single objective tests to measure participant’s final outcome. Objectives: The objective of this study was to describe the pain and disability in long-term follow-up of participants after a distal radius fracture. Participants who had previously participated in a prospective study, where baseline and standardized one-year follow-up were performed, were contacted to volunteer to participate in this follow-up (FU) study. Sixty-five participants (17 males, 48 females) with an average age of 57 (SD 13) years at the time of injury and 67 (SD 13 years) at follow-up were evaluated at an average of 11(SD 6) years (range 2-20 years). Results: The majority of patients (85%) participants reported no change or had less pain and disability (PRWE) (<5 point difference) at their long-term follow-up compared to their one year PRWE scores. One year PRWE scores were found to be predictive (19.1%) of the variability in long term PRWE score (p=0.02). Age, gender, and mechanism of fall were not significant predictors of worsened outcome. Conclusion: The majority of people that are experiencing no or low patient reported pain and disability one year following a DRF can expect to retain their positive outcome 10-20 years later. This study did not identify how to predict worsened outcome.


2005 ◽  
Vol 18 (01) ◽  
pp. 18-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. J. Langley Hobbs ◽  
M. H. Hamilton

SummaryThe use of the AO (Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen) veterinary mini ‘T’-plate for stabilisation of distal radius and ulna fractures in toy breed dogs was evaluated in a retrospective study. All of the 14 dogs in the study weighed 3.5 kg or less. The AO mini ‘T’-platea was used as the final means of fixation in all cases. It was used as the primary form of stabilisation in ten dogs, and in four dogs it was used at revision surgery. In all cases the fractures healed. Return to function was graded as excellent in six cases, good in four and fair in two. Two dogs were lost to long-term follow up. It was concluded that the AO veterinary mini ‘T’-plate is a suitable choice of implant for stabilisation of distal radius and ulna fractures in toy breed dogs, especially when the distal fragment is very small.


Injury ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 50 ◽  
pp. S59-S63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anastasios V. Korompilias ◽  
Ioannis S. Gkiatas ◽  
Marios G. Lykissas ◽  
Alexandros E. Beris ◽  
Ioannis P. Kostas-Agnantis

2019 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
Author(s):  
John P. A. Ioannidis

AbstractNeurobiology-based interventions for mental diseases and searches for useful biomarkers of treatment response have largely failed. Clinical trials should assess interventions related to environmental and social stressors, with long-term follow-up; social rather than biological endpoints; personalized outcomes; and suitable cluster, adaptive, and n-of-1 designs. Labor, education, financial, and other social/political decisions should be evaluated for their impacts on mental disease.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document