Rotational component alignment in patient-specific total knee arthroplasty compared with conventional cutting instrument

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 1297-1304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nuttawut Chanalithichai ◽  
Nattapol Tammachote ◽  
Chane Jitapunkul ◽  
Supakit Kanitnate
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Rotational Component ◽  
Component Alignment ◽  
Total Knee

Higher Component Malposition Rates with Patient-Specific Cruciate Retaining TKA than Contemporary Posterior Stabilized TKA

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prakrit Kumar ◽  
Jacob Elfrink ◽  
James P. Daniels ◽  
Ajay Aggarwal ◽  
James A. Keeney
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Surgical Technique ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Demographic Characteristics ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Posterior Stabilized ◽  
Component Alignment ◽  
Cruciate Retaining ◽  
Femoral Notching ◽  
Total Knee

AbstractCustomized individually manufactured total knee arthroplasty (CIM-TKA) was developed to improve kinematic total knee arthroplasty (TKA) performance. Component placement accuracy may influence the success of CIM-TKA designs. We performed this study to compare radiographic component alignment and revision rates of a cruciate retaining (CR) CIM-TKA and a contemporary posterior stabilized TKA (PS-TKA). After obtaining Institutional Review Board approval, we identified 94 CR CIM-TKAs (76 patients) and 91 PS-TKAs (82 patients) performed between July 1, 2013 and December 31, 2014 with a minimum 2-year follow-up (mean 41.1 months, range 24–59 months). We performed a retrospective electronic medical record review to identify patient demographic characteristics and revision procedures performed. Postoperative plain radiographs were reviewed to assess component alignment including cruciate ligament imbalance, femoral overhang, and femoral notching. Demographic characteristics, component malalignment, and revision surgery rates were assessed using a student's t-test or two-tailed Fisher's exact test, with a p-value < 0.05 designating significance. Technical errors were more commonly identified with CR CIM-TKA (29.8 vs. 9.9%, p < 0.001), including higher rates of tibiofemoral instability (13.8 vs. 1.1%, p < 0.01), femoral notching (12.8 vs. 3.3%, p = 0.03), and patellofemoral malalignment (20.2 vs. 7.7%, p = 0.02). CR CIM-TKA had more frequent coronal plane malposition (26.6 vs. 9.9%, p < 0.01) or sagittal plane reconstruction > 3 degrees outside of an optimized range (20.2 vs. 9.9%, p = 0.06). Aseptic revisions occurred more frequently with the CR CIM-TKA design (9.6 vs. 3.3%, p = 0.13). Demographic characteristics were not significantly different between the treatment groups. CR CIM-TKA may improve kinematic performance for patients undergoing knee replacement surgery. However, our study observations suggest that careful attention to surgical technique is important for optimizing implant survivorship with the CR CIM-TKA design. Additional study is needed to determine whether higher revision rates identified during this study are related to patient selection, surgical technique, or implant design.

The Accuracy and Clinical Success of Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty

2021 ◽  
pp. 155633162110263
Author(s):  
Brian T. Nickel ◽  
Kaitlin M. Carroll ◽  
Andrew D. Pearle ◽  
Laura J. Kleeblad ◽  
Joost Burger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
High Reliability ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Component Alignment ◽  
Robotic Assisted ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Total Knee

Background: Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) has emerged as a patient-specific customizable tool that enables 3-dimensional preoperative planning, intraoperative adjustment, robotic-assisted bone preparation, and soft-tissue protection. Haptic rTKA may enhance component positioning, but only a few small studies have examined patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes after haptic rTKA. Purpose: In patients who underwent haptic rTKA, we sought to evaluate (1) the discrepancy in alignment between the executed surgical plan and implanted alignment in the coronal and sagittal planes 1 year postoperatively and (2) patient-reported outcomes 2 years postoperatively. Methods: From a prospectively collected database, we reviewed 105 patients who underwent haptic rTKA from August 2016 to May 2017. Two fellowship-trained arthroplasty surgeons independently reviewed hip-to-ankle standing biplanar radiographs to measure overall limb alignment and individual tibial and femoral component alignment relative to the mechanical axis and compared this to the executed surgical plan. Patient-reported outcomes were collected preoperatively and at 2 years postoperatively using the Lower Activity Extremity Score (LEAS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Junior (KOOS Jr.), and Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). Results: Mean patient age was 62.4 years, and mean body mass index was 30.6 kg/m2. Interobserver reliability was significant with a κ of 0.89. Absolute mean deviations in postoperative coronal alignment compared to intraoperative alignment were 0.625° ± 0.70° and 0.45° ± 0.50° for the tibia and femur, respectively. Absolute mean deviations in postoperative tibial sagittal alignment were 0.47° ± 0.76°. Overall mechanical alignment was 0.97° ± 1.79°. Outcomes in LEAS, KOOS Jr., and NPRS changed from 8 to 10, 78 to 88.3, and 8 to 1, respectively. Conclusions: Haptic rTKA demonstrated high reliability and accuracy (less than 1°) of tibial coronal, femoral coronal, and tibial sagittal component alignment postoperatively compared to the surgical plan. Patient-reported outcomes improved, as well. A more rigorous study on long-term outcomes is warranted.

scholarly journals A study on radiological outcomes of accelerometer based hand held navigation system in total knee arthroplasty

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 556
Author(s):  
Hiranyakumar S. ◽  
Shivaraj Nadagouda ◽  
Vishnu Harikrishnan
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Navigation System ◽  
Mechanical Axis ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Computer Assisted ◽  
Component Alignment ◽  
Patient Specific Instrumentation ◽  
Wear And Tear ◽  
Total Knee

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> The goal of obtaining more accurate component alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has led to the development of techniques like portable accelerometer-based handheld navigation system, computer assisted system, patient specific instrumentation. Among which hand held navigation has showed promising results for achieving accurate resection and alignment and only few studies were done to assess radiological outcome or the effective component alignment using portable accelerometer-based hand held navigation system in TKA.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> TKA using portable accelerometer-based hand held navigation system (Smith and Nephew- knee align) was done on 25 knees with primary osteoarthritis. Preoperative and post-operative mechanical axis and component alignments were measured using hip-to-ankle radiographs.<strong></strong></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> Among the femoral components, 92.0% were placed within 90°±2° to the femoral mechanical axis in the coronal and   96.0% of the tibial components were placed within 90°±2° to the mechanical axis in the coronal plane, 94.3% of the TKAs had an overall lower extremity alignment within 3° of neutral to the mechanical axis, based on postoperative hip-to-ankle radiographs.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> The degree of accuracy in positioning the femoral and tibial component in TKA using portable accelerometer-based hand held navigation system (knee align) is very much promising and is an effective intraoperative tool for reducing the proportion of outliers for component placement and thus decreasing the chances of instability and early wear and tear of the components in TKA.</p>

Patient-Specific Instrumentation in Total Knee Arthroplasty Provides No Improvement in Component Alignment

2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (9) ◽  
pp. 1705-1708 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin M. Stronach ◽  
Christopher E. Pelt ◽  
Jill A. Erickson ◽  
Christopher L. Peters
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Component Alignment ◽  
Patient Specific Instrumentation ◽  
Total Knee

scholarly journals Should we abandon the patient-specific instrumentation ship in total knee arthroplasty? Not quite yet!

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
László Török ◽  
Péter Jávor ◽  
Petra Hartmann ◽  
László Bánki ◽  
Endre Varga
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Transfusion Rate ◽  
Component Alignment ◽  
Patient Specific Instrumentation ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Total Knee

AbstractPatient-specific Instrumentation (PSI) is an innovative technique aiding the precise implementation of the preoperative plan during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) by using patient-specific guides and cutting blocks. Despite of the theoretical advantages, studies have reported contradictory results, thus there is no consensus regarding the overall effectiveness of PSI. Through the critical assessment of a meta-analysis published lately, this correspondence aims to highlight the complexity of comparing the efficacy of PSI to standard instrumentation (SI). The accuracy of component alignment, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), surgery time, blood loss, transfusion rate, and postoperative complications are commonly used outcomes for investigating the efficacy of PSI-aided TKA. By assessing component alignment, the expertise of the surgeon(s) should be taken into consideration, since PSI may not provide benefits for expert surgeons but might improve accuracy and patient safety during the learning curve of novice surgeons. With respect to PROMs and postoperative complications, PSI may not improve short-term results; however, long-term follow up data is missing. Regarding transfusion rates, favorable trends can be observed, but further studies utilizing recent data are needed for a clear conclusion. When assessing surgery time, we suggest focusing on operating room turnover instead of procedure time.

Total Hospital Costs and Readmission Rate of Patient-Specific Instrument in Total Knee Arthroplasty Patients

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Thomas ◽  
Ankur Patel ◽  
Corey Patrick ◽  
Gary Delhougne
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Hospital Cost ◽  
Readmission Rate ◽  
Hospital Costs ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
P Value ◽  
Total Hospital Cost ◽  
Total Hospital ◽  
Total Knee

AbstractDespite advancements in surgical technique and component design, implant loosening, stiffness, and instability remain leading causes of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) failure. Patient-specific instruments (PSI) aid in surgical precision and in implant positioning and ultimately reduce readmissions and revisions in TKA. The objective of the study was to evaluate total hospital cost and readmission rate at 30, 60, 90, and 365 days in PSI-guided TKA patients. We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent a primary TKA for osteoarthritis from the Premier Perspective Database between 2014 and 2017 Q2. TKA with PSI patients were identified using appropriate keywords from billing records and compared against patients without PSI. Patients were excluded if they were < 21 years of age; outpatient hospital discharges; evidence of revision TKA; bilateral TKA in same discharge or different discharges. 1:1 propensity score matching was used to control patients, hospital, and clinical characteristics. Generalized Estimating Equation model with appropriate distribution and link function were used to estimate hospital related cost while logistic regression models were used to estimate 30, 60, and 90 days and 1-year readmission rate. The study matched 3,358 TKAs with PSI with TKA without PSI patients. Mean total hospital costs were statistically significantly (p < 0.0001) lower for TKA with PSI ($14,910; 95% confidence interval [CI]: $14,735–$15,087) than TKA without PSI patients ($16,018; 95% CI: $15,826–$16,212). TKA with PSI patients were 31% (odds ratio [OR]: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.51–0.95; p-value = 0.0218) less likely to be readmitted at 30 days; 35% (OR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.50–0.86; p-value = 0.0022) less likely to be readmitted at 60 days; 32% (OR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.53–0.88; p-value = 0.0031) less likely to be readmitted at 90 days; 28% (OR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.60–0.86; p-value = 0.0004) less likely to be readmitted at 365 days than TKA without PSI patients. Hospitals and health care professionals can use retrospective real-world data to make informed decisions on using PSI to reduce hospital cost and readmission rate, and improve outcomes in TKA patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document