Overcoming CSF overdrainage with the adjustable gravitational valve proSA

2013 ◽  
Vol 156 (4) ◽  
pp. 767-776 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christoph A. Tschan ◽  
Sebastian Antes ◽  
Alexandra Huthmann ◽  
Sonja Vulcu ◽  
Joachim Oertel ◽  
...  
2002 ◽  
Vol 18 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 15-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony A. Virella ◽  
Marcelo Galarza ◽  
Michael Masterman-Smith ◽  
Rafael Lemus ◽  
Jorge A. Lazareff
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 216-224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark R. Kraemer ◽  
Carolina Sandoval-Garcia ◽  
Taryn Bragg ◽  
Bermans J. Iskandar

OBJECTIVEThe authors conducted a survey to evaluate differences in the understanding and management of shunt-dependent hydrocephalus among members of the American Society of Pediatric Neurosurgeons (ASPN).METHODSSurveys were sent to all 204 active ASPN members in September 2014. One hundred thirty responses were received, representing a 64% response rate. Respondents were asked 13 multiple-choice and free-response questions regarding 4 fundamental problems encountered in shunted-hydrocephalus management: shunt malfunction, chronic cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) overdrainage, chronic headaches, and slit ventricle syndrome (SVS).RESULTSRespondents agreed that shunt malfunction occurs most often as the result of ventricular catheter obstruction. Despite contrary evidence in the literature, most respondents (66%) also believed that choroid plexus is the tissue most often found in obstructed proximal catheters. However, free-text responses revealed that the respondents’ understanding of the underlying pathophysiology of shunt obstruction was highly variable and included growth, migration, or adherence of choroid plexus, CSF debris, catheter position, inflammatory processes, and CSF overdrainage. Most respondents considered chronic CSF overdrainage to be a rare complication of shunting in their practice and reported wide variation in treatment protocols. Moreover, despite a lack of evidence in the literature, most respondents attributed chronic headaches in shunt patients to medical reasons (for example, migraines, tension). Accordingly, most respondents managed headaches with reassurance and/or referral to pain clinics. Lastly, there were variable opinions on the etiology of slit ventricle syndrome (SVS), which included early shunting, chronic overdrainage, and/or loss of brain compliance. Beyond shunt revision, respondents reported divergent SVS treatment preferences.CONCLUSIONSThe survey shows that there is wide variability in the understanding and management of shunt-dependent hydrocephalus and its complications. Such discrepancies appear to be derived partly from inconsistent familiarity with existing literature but especially from a paucity of high-quality publications.


2009 ◽  
Vol 25 (9) ◽  
pp. 1061-1069 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan F. Martínez-Lage ◽  
Antonio M. Ruíz-Espejo ◽  
María-José Almagro ◽  
Raúl Alfaro ◽  
Matías Felipe-Murcia ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 153 (5) ◽  
pp. 1141-1142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Volker Maus ◽  
Athanasios K. Petridis ◽  
Alexandros Doukas ◽  
Hubertus Maximilian Mehdorn

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Scollato ◽  
Saverio Caini ◽  
Lucia Angelini ◽  
Giancarlo Lastrucci ◽  
Nicola Di Lorenzo ◽  
...  

AbstractCSF shunting with adjustable valve is the treatment of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. The opening pressure valve setting is left to the neurosurgeon’s experience. Aqueductal CSF stroke volume by phase-contrast magnetic resonance measures the CSF passing through the Sylvian aqueduct and it changes with intracranial hydrodynamics. We sought to identify a window of stroke volume differences associated with the best clinical outcome and lowest rate of complications. The records of 69 patients were reviewed. At every clinical check, stroke volume, opening pressure valve, clinical outcome, and CSF overdrainage were analyzed. The correlation between stroke volume differences and negative outcome was also analyzed. The median follow-up was 2.3 years (range 0.3–10.4 years). The odds of negative outcome between two consecutive checks significantly increased by 16% (95%CI 4–28%, p = 0.006). Taking the lowest risk group as reference, the odds ratio of negative outcome was 1.16 (95%CI 0.51–2.63, p = 0.726) for SV differences less than − 37.6 µL, while it was 1.96 (95%CI 0.97–3.98, p = 0.062) for stroke volume changes above + 23.1 µL. Maintaining stroke volume values within a definite range might help maximize clinical benefit and avoid the risk of CSF overdrainage.


2012 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 468-472 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin R. Weinzierl ◽  
Franz-Josef Hans ◽  
Michael Stoffel ◽  
Markus F. Oertel ◽  
Marcus C. Korinth

Object Symptomatic overdrainage in children with shunt-treated hydrocephalus represents one of the more difficult shunt-related diseases and may require repeated surgery. Gravity-assisted valve design has become a standard device to avoid overdrainage in many European pediatric hydrocephalus centers. However, the use of a gravitational valve for relieving symptoms associated with overdrainage has not yet been addressed. The goal of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a gravitational valve in the treatment of symptomatic overdrainage in children with shunts. Methods Seventeen children with an adjustable shunt system and symptomatic overdrainage were treated by insertion of a gravitational valve. Clinical and radiological outcome were monitored for a minimum of 12 months after surgery. Results Implantation of a gravitational valve resulted in either resolution (n = 12) or improvement (n = 5) of the symptoms. In 1 patient, symptoms remained almost unchanged and the gravitational valve had to be upgraded, resulting in resolution of the symptoms. During follow-up, the pressure setting of the adjustable differential pressure valve had to be changed in 7 patients. Conclusions The gravitational valve was effective in improving symptomatic overdrainage in the majority of patients in the present study. Because the ideal pressure setting for a given patient is hard to determine a priori, adjustable valve systems appear to be beneficial.


2017 ◽  
Vol 44 ◽  
pp. 8-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Moghtader ◽  
Hans-Joachim Crawack ◽  
Christoph Miethke ◽  
Zinah Dörlemann ◽  
Frank G. Shellock

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document