Predictors of antegrade flow at internal carotid artery during carotid artery stenting with proximal protection

2018 ◽  
Vol 160 (6) ◽  
pp. 1121-1127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kei Harada ◽  
Kosuke Kakumoto ◽  
Shogo Oshikata ◽  
Kozo Fukuyama
Keyword(s):  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Internal Carotid Artery ◽  
Carotid Artery Stenting ◽  
Internal Carotid ◽  
Proximal Protection ◽  
Antegrade Flow

scholarly journals The combined use of proximal and distal protection devices uring carotid stenting: A case report

2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 73
Author(s):  
D. U. Malaev ◽  
D. A. Redkin ◽  
V. I. Baystrukov ◽  
A. A. Prokhorikhin ◽  
A. A. Boykov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Flow ◽  
Informed Consent ◽  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Internal Carotid Artery ◽  
Conflict Of Interest ◽  
Internal Carotid ◽  
Carotid Stenting ◽  
Protection System ◽  
Combined Use ◽  
Proximal Protection

<p>Despite the development of modern medical technologies, cerebrovascular disease remains a major health and social issue. Among all the cases of ischemic stroke, approximately 20% are attributable to stenotic lesions in the carotid artery. The main drawback of carotid stenting is the risk of embolic complications during the procedure. To resolve this problem, various devices that protect against embolism have been developed. In this clinical case, we describe the ability to minimize the risk of operative stroke through a combined application of the distal and proximal protection systems in carotid stenting.</p><p>In our patient, a 65-year-old woman, angiography of the carotid arteries revealed an ulcerated atherosclerotic plaque of the right internal carotid artery, with stenosis of the lumen of up to 95%. Considering the high risk of distal embolism, the Mo MaUltra (Italy) proximal protection system was used. When evaluating the installation of the Mo MaUltra system, the preserved blood flow through the superior thyroid artery and, therefore, the antegrade blood flow in the internal carotid artery was revealed. Considering the identified risk and the anatomy of the plaque surface, we decided on the additional use of the distal SpiderFX (USA) protection device.</p><p>The combined use of proximal protection system and distal protective device for carotid stenting is technically possible and may reduce the risk of embolic complications.</p><p>Received 23 January 2019. Revised 18 March 2019. Published 23 April 2019.</p><p><strong>Informed consent:</strong> The patient’s informed consent to use the records for medical purposes is obtained.</p><p><strong>Funding:</strong> The study did not have sponsorship.</p><p><strong>Conflict of interest:</strong> Authors declare no conflict of interest.</p>

scholarly journals Carotid artery stenting for patients with occipital–vertebral anastomosis

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 212-218
Author(s):  
Ryuichiro Kajikawa ◽  
Toshiyuki Fujinaka ◽  
Hajime Nakamura ◽  
Manabu Kinoshita ◽  
Takeo Nishida ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Internal Carotid Artery ◽  
Vertebral Artery ◽  
High Intensity ◽  
Carotid Artery Stenting ◽  
Internal Carotid ◽  
External Carotid ◽  
Occipital Artery ◽  
Protection Method ◽  
Distal Internal Carotid Artery

Background and purpose We report the outcomes of carotid artery stenting for patients with angiographically visible occipital artery–vertebral artery anastomosis. Methods Among 47 consecutive patients who underwent carotid artery stenting from January 2007 to December 2010, seven patients for whom cerebral angiograms clearly showed occipital artery–vertebral artery anastomosis were selected. Four different protection methods were used: distal internal carotid artery protection; carotid flow reversal; seatbelt and airbag technique; and double protection method of protecting both the external and internal carotid artery. Results One patient with distal internal carotid artery protection showed a high-intensity lesion at the border of the upper thalamus, internal capsule and lateral ventricle wall after carotid artery stenting. The other patient with the double protection method did not show any high-intensity lesions on postoperative diffusion-weighted imaging in the vertebrobasilar territory. All seven patients with visible occipital artery–vertebral artery anastomosis showed ipsilateral vertebral artery severe stenosis or occlusion. Conclusion Large occipital artery–vertebral artery anastomosis may be a pathway for embolic materials during carotid artery stenting. External carotid artery protection is recommended for carotid artery stenting in such patients.

scholarly journals Direct Percutaneous Carotid Artery Stenting for a Patient with Absence of the Common Carotid Artery

2012 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 320-325 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Toyota ◽  
A. Wakayama ◽  
T. Yoshimine
Keyword(s):  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Internal Carotid Artery ◽  
Common Carotid Artery ◽  
Carotid Artery Stenosis ◽  
Carotid Artery Stenting ◽  
Internal Carotid ◽  
Postoperative Radiotherapy ◽  
Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis ◽  
Tonsillar Carcinoma ◽  
The Common

A 54-year-old man with symptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis with absence of the common carotid artery (CCA), who had been treated with surgery and postoperative radiotherapy for tonsillar carcinoma, underwent direct percutaneous carotid artery stenting (CAS). To our knowledge, this is the first report of direct percutaneous carotid artery stenting (CAS) for a patient with absent CCA.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document