Radiosurgery treatment is associated with improved facial nerve preservation versus repeat resection in recurrent vestibular schwannomas

2019 ◽  
Vol 161 (7) ◽  
pp. 1449-1456 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prasanth Romiyo ◽  
Edwin Ng ◽  
Dillon Dejam ◽  
Kevin Ding ◽  
John P Sheppard ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. E2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reid Hoshide ◽  
Harrison Faulkner ◽  
Mario Teo ◽  
Charles Teo

OBJECTIVEThere are numerous treatment strategies in the management for large vestibular schwannomas, including resection only, staged resections, resections followed by radiosurgery, and radiosurgery only. Recent evidence has pointed toward maximal resection as being the optimum strategy to prevent tumor recurrence; however, durable tumor control through aggressive resection has been shown to occur at the expense of facial nerve function and to risk other approach-related complications. Through a retrospective analysis of their single-institution series of keyhole neurosurgical approaches for large vestibular schwannomas, the authors aim to report and justify key techniques to maximize tumor resection and reduce surgical morbidity.METHODSA retrospective chart review was performed at the Centre for Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery. All patients who had undergone a keyhole retrosigmoid approach for the resection of large vestibular schwannomas, defined as having a tumor diameter of ≥ 3.0 cm, were included in this review. Patient demographics, preoperative cranial nerve status, perioperative data, and postoperative follow-up were obtained. A review of the literature for resections of large vestibular schwannomas was also performed. The authors’ institutional data were compared with the historical data from the literature.RESULTSBetween 2004 and 2017, 45 patients met the inclusion criteria for this retrospective chart review. When compared with findings in a historical cohort in the literature, the authors’ minimally invasive, keyhole retrosigmoid technique for the resection of large vestibular schwannomas achieved higher rates of gross-total or near-total resection (100% vs 83%). Moreover, these results compare favorably with the literature in facial nerve preservation (House-Brackmann I–II) at follow-up after gross-total resections (81% vs 47%, p < 0.001) and near-total resections (88% vs 75%, p = 0.028). There were no approach-related complications in this series.CONCLUSIONSIt is the experience of the senior author that complete or near-complete resection of large vestibular schwannomas can be successfully achieved via a keyhole approach. In this series of 45 large vestibular schwannomas, a greater extent of resection was achieved while demonstrating high rates of facial nerve preservation and low approach-related and postoperative complications compared with the literature.


2012 ◽  
Vol 73 (S 02) ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Matthies ◽  
J. Perez ◽  
F. Raslan ◽  
G. Vince ◽  
T. Westermaier ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 75 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amjad Anaizi ◽  
Eric Gantwerker ◽  
Myles Pensak ◽  
Philip Theodosopoulos

2014 ◽  
Vol 75 (S 02) ◽  
Author(s):  
Cordula Matthies ◽  
M. Hummel ◽  
J. Perez ◽  
R. Hagen ◽  
R. Ernestus

Skull Base ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 19 (03) ◽  
Author(s):  
Awadhesh Jaiswal ◽  
Sushila Jaiswal ◽  
Arun Srivastava ◽  
Rabi Sahu ◽  
Sanjay Behari ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Max Whitmeyer ◽  
Bledi C. Brahimaj ◽  
André Beer-Furlan ◽  
Sameer Alvi ◽  
Madeline J. Epsten ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVEMultiple short series have evaluated the efficacy of salvage microsurgery (MS) after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for treatment of vestibular schwannomas (VSs); however, there is a lack of a large volume of patient data available for interpretation and clinical adaptation. The goal of this study was to provide a comprehensive review of tumor characteristics, management, and surgical outcomes of salvage of MS after SRS for VS.METHODSThe Medline/PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases were queried according to PRISMA guidelines. All English-language and translated publications were included. Studies lacking adequate study characteristics and outcomes were excluded. Cases involving neurofibromatosis type 2, previous MS, or malignant transformation were excluded when possible.RESULTSTwenty studies containing 297 cases met inclusion criteria. Three additional cases from Rush University Medical Center were added for 300 total cases. Tumor growth with or without symptoms was the primary indication for salvage surgery (92.3% of cases), followed by worsening of symptoms without growth (4.6%) and cystic enlargement (3.1%). The average time to MS after SRS was 39.4 months. The average size and volume of tumor at surgery were 2.44 cm and 5.92 cm3, respectively. The surgical approach was retrosigmoid (42.8%) and translabyrinthine (57.2%); 59.5% of patients had a House-Brackmann (HB) grade of I or II. The facial nerve was preserved in 91.5% of cases. Facial nerve preservation and HB grades were lower for the translabyrinthine versus retrosigmoid approach (p = 0.31 and p = 0.18, respectively); however, fewer complications were noted in the translabyrinthine approach (p = 0.29). Gross-total resection (GTR) was completed in 55.7% of surgeries. Studies that predominantly used subtotal resection (STR) were associated with a lower rate of facial nerve injury (5.3% vs 11.3%, p = 0.07) and higher rate of HB grade I or II (72.9% vs 48.0%, p = 0.00003) versus those using predominantly GTR. However, majority STR was associated with a recurrence rate of 3.6% as compared to 1.4% for majority GTR (p = 0.29).CONCLUSIONSThis study showed that the leading cause of MS after SRS was tumor growth at an average of 39.4 months after radiation. There were no significant differences in outcomes of facial nerve preservation, postoperative HB grade, or complication rate based on surgical approach. Patients who underwent STR showed statistically significant better HB outcomes compared with GTR. MS after SRS was considered by most authors to be more difficult than primary MS. These data support the notion that the surgical goals of salvage surgery are debulking of tumor mass, decreasing compression of the brainstem, and not necessarily pursuing GTR.


Neurosurgery ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 75 (6) ◽  
pp. 671-677 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amjad N. Anaizi ◽  
Eric A. Gantwerker ◽  
Myles L. Pensak ◽  
Philip V. Theodosopoulos

Abstract Background: Facial nerve preservation surgery for large vestibular schwannomas is a novel strategy for maintaining normal nerve function by allowing residual tumor adherent to this nerve or root-entry zone. Objective: To report, in a retrospective study, outcomes for large Koos grade 3 and 4 vestibular schwannomas. Methods: After surgical treatment for vestibular schwannomas in 52 patients (2004–2013), outcomes included extent of resection, postoperative hearing, and facial nerve function. Extent of resection defined as gross total, near total, or subtotal were 7 (39%), 3 (17%), and 8 (44%) in 18 patients after retrosigmoid approaches, respectively, and 10 (29.5%), 9 (26.5%), and 15 (44%) for 34 patients after translabyrinthine approaches, respectively. Results: Hearing was preserved in 1 (20%) of 5 gross total, 0 of 2 near-total, and 1 (33%) of 3 subtotal resections. Good long-term facial nerve function (House-Brackmann grades of I and II) was achieved in 16 of 17 gross total (94%), 11 of 12 near-total (92%), and 21 of 23 subtotal (91%) resections. Long-term tumor control was 100% for gross total, 92% for near-total, and 83% for subtotal resections. Postoperative radiation therapy was delivered to 9 subtotal resection patients and 1 near-total resection patient. Follow-up averaged 33 months. Conclusion: Our findings support facial nerve preservation surgery in becoming the new standard for acoustic neuroma treatment. Maximizing resection and close postoperative radiographic follow-up enable early identification of tumors that will progress to radiosurgical treatment. This sequential approach can lead to combined optimal facial nerve function and effective tumor control rates.


2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrien Gendre ◽  
Holly Jones ◽  
Alison McHugh ◽  
Justin Hintze ◽  
Fiachra Martin ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose: Facial nerve resection is often required in lateral temporal bone resection for tumors extending to the lateral skull base. Limited data exists to guide facial nerve reanimation strategies. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study. Patients undergoing lateral temporal bone resection in a national referral center were included and divided into two groups: facial nerve preservation or resection. Survival and locoregional recurrence outcomes were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Prognostic factors were identified using univariate and multivariate analysis. Facial nerve reconstructive methods were collected.Results: 39 patients were included with 20 having facial nerve resection at surgery. Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) was the most common pathology. 48% of patients died during follow-up. Mean overall survival (OS) was 27 months and mean time to locoregional recurrence (LRR) 23 months in the facial nerve preservation group. Mean OS was 16 months and mean time to LRR was 13 months in the facial nerve resection groups (logrank OS p=0.330 and LRR p=0.445). 75% of patients in the facial nerve resection group had static facial nerve reanimation using tarsorrhaphy, gold-weight eyelid implant and fascia lata sling. Middle ear cavity extension was a negative predictor of OS and LRR.Conclusion: Facial nerve resection during lateral temporal bone surgery is associated with poor overall survival and locoregional control outcomes. Multidisciplinary surgical management and static facial reanimation should be offered to maintain function and quality of life in this group of patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document