temporal bone resection
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

134
(FIVE YEARS 29)

H-INDEX

12
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrien Gendre ◽  
Holly Jones ◽  
Alison McHugh ◽  
Justin Hintze ◽  
Fiachra Martin ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose: Facial nerve resection is often required in lateral temporal bone resection for tumors extending to the lateral skull base. Limited data exists to guide facial nerve reanimation strategies. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study. Patients undergoing lateral temporal bone resection in a national referral center were included and divided into two groups: facial nerve preservation or resection. Survival and locoregional recurrence outcomes were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Prognostic factors were identified using univariate and multivariate analysis. Facial nerve reconstructive methods were collected.Results: 39 patients were included with 20 having facial nerve resection at surgery. Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) was the most common pathology. 48% of patients died during follow-up. Mean overall survival (OS) was 27 months and mean time to locoregional recurrence (LRR) 23 months in the facial nerve preservation group. Mean OS was 16 months and mean time to LRR was 13 months in the facial nerve resection groups (logrank OS p=0.330 and LRR p=0.445). 75% of patients in the facial nerve resection group had static facial nerve reanimation using tarsorrhaphy, gold-weight eyelid implant and fascia lata sling. Middle ear cavity extension was a negative predictor of OS and LRR.Conclusion: Facial nerve resection during lateral temporal bone surgery is associated with poor overall survival and locoregional control outcomes. Multidisciplinary surgical management and static facial reanimation should be offered to maintain function and quality of life in this group of patients.


Author(s):  
S Leedman ◽  
R Wormald ◽  
S Flukes

Abstract Objectives To evaluate the outcomes for patients after lateral temporal bone resection surgery for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma and basal cell carcinoma, and to ascertain predictors of survival and treatment failure. Methods A retrospective review was conducted of the medical records for all patients who underwent lateral temporal bone resection for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma or basal cell carcinoma between 2007 and 2019 in Western Australia. Results Thirty-seven patients underwent lateral temporal bone resection surgery. Median follow-up duration was 22 months. Twenty-five patients had squamous cell carcinoma and 12 had basal cell carcinoma. The overall survival rate at two years for patients with squamous cell carcinoma was 68.5 per cent. Pre-operative facial nerve involvement (determined via clinical or radiological evidence) was identified as a predictor of mortality (hazard ratio = 3.411, p = 0.006), with all patients dying before two years post-operatively. Locoregional tumour control was achieved in 81 per cent of cases (n = 30). Conclusion Lateral temporal bone resection offers acceptable local control rates and survival outcomes. Caution should be used in offering this surgery to patients with clinical or radiological evidence of facial nerve involvement because of the relatively poorer survival outcomes in this subgroup.


Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (18) ◽  
pp. 4556
Author(s):  
Noritaka Komune ◽  
Daisuke Kuga ◽  
Koichi Miki ◽  
Takashi Nakagawa

Currently, only lateral temporal bone resection (LTBR) and subtotal temporal bone resection (STBR) are widely utilized for the surgical treatment of advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the external auditory canal (EAC-SCC). However, there are few descriptions of variations on these surgical approaches. This study aimed to elucidate the variations of en bloc resection for advanced EAC-SCC. We dissected the four sides of cadaveric heads to reveal the anatomical structures related to temporal bone resection. From the viewpoint of surgical anatomy, surgical patterns of temporal bone cutting can be divided into four categories: conventional LTBR, extended LTBR, conventional STBR, and modified STBR. Extended LTBR is divided into four types: superior, inferior, anterior, and posterior extensions. Several extension procedures can be combined based on the extension of the tumor. Furthermore, en bloc resection with the temporomandibular joint or glenoid fossa increases the technical difficulty of a surgical procedure because the exposure and manipulation of the petrous segment of the internal carotid artery are limited from the middle cranial fossa. Surgical approaches for advanced SCC of the temporal bone are diverse. They require accurate preoperative evaluation of the tumor extension and preoperative consideration of the exact line of resection to achieve marginal negative resection.


Author(s):  
Rima S. Rindler ◽  
Roberto M. Soriano ◽  
Bona Kim ◽  
Juan M. Revuelta Barbero ◽  
Gustavo Pradilla ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kohei Saijo ◽  
Yushi Ueki ◽  
Ryoko Tanaka ◽  
Yusuke Yokoyama ◽  
Jo Omata ◽  
...  

We examined the role of lateral temporal bone resection (LTBR) in the treatment of external ear canal (EAC) carcinoma between 2007 and 2018. The estimated 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) according to the tumor stage and treatments were investigated in 36 patients with EAC squamous cell carcinoma. T stage classification according to the University of Pittsburgh staging system was as follows: 14 patients in T1, four patients in T2, nine patients in T3, and nine patients in T4. The 3-year DFS rate was 77.4% for T1 tumors, 100% for T2, 44.4% for T3 tumors, and 11.1% for T4 tumors (p < 001). The 3-year DSS rate was 100% for T1/T2 tumors, 87.5% for T3 tumors, and 11.1% for T4 tumors (p < 0.01). T1/T2 patients received mostly LTBR. Among nine T3 tumors, five patients (56%) received LTBR combined with preoperative chemotherapy and/or postoperative radiation (RT). Four of them had negative surgical margin and survived with no evidence of disease. The DFS of T3 patients who underwent concurrent chemoradiotherapy and LTBR was 0 and 80%, respectively (p = 0.048). For T1/T2 tumors, surgery achieved an excellent outcome. For T3 tumors, LTBR achieved negative surgical margin and showed good survival when combined with preoperative chemotherapy and/or postoperative RT. In contrast, the prognosis of T3 patients who could not undergo surgery was as poor as that of T4 patients. Therefore, in addition to subtotal temporal bone resection, LTBR-based treatment strategy may be a treatment option for limited cases of T3 patients.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 263-274
Author(s):  
Noritaka Komune ◽  
Yoshie Higashino ◽  
Kazuha Ishikawa ◽  
Tomoko Tabuki ◽  
Shogo Masuda ◽  
...  

Background: There is no guideline for hearing compensation after temporal bone resection. This study aimed to retrospectively analyze surgical cases with reconstruction for hearing preservation after temporal bone malignancy resection and propose a new alternative to compensate for hearing loss. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 30 patients who underwent lateral temporal bone surgery for temporal bone malignancy at our institution and examined their hearing abilities after surgery. Result: The hearing outcomes of patients with an external auditory meatus reconstruction varied widely. The mean postoperative air–bone gap at 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz ranged from 22.5 dB to 71.25 dB. On the other hand, the average difference between the aided sound field thresholds with cartilage conduction hearing aid and bone conduction thresholds at 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz ranged from −3.75 to 41.25. More closely located auricular cartilage and temporal bone resulted in smaller differences between the aided sound field and bone conduction thresholds. Conclusions: There is still room for improvement of surgical techniques for reconstruction of the auditory meatus to preserve hearing after temporal bone resection. The cartilage conduction hearing aid may provide non-invasive postoperative hearing compensation after lateral temporal bone resection.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. C. Schachtel ◽  
Mitesh Gandhi ◽  
James J. Bowman ◽  
Christopher Erian ◽  
Sandro V. Porceddu ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noritaka Komune ◽  
Satoshi Matsuo ◽  
Ryo Shimamoto ◽  
Kou Ikemura ◽  
Joe Iwanaga ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Noritaka Komune ◽  
Daisuke Kuga ◽  
Kazuki Hashimoto ◽  
Yoshinori Fujiwara ◽  
Ryo Shimamoto ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document