Customized virtual surgical planning in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery: a prospective randomized trial

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (7) ◽  
pp. 3115-3122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Schneider ◽  
Peer W. Kämmerer ◽  
Matthias Hennig ◽  
Gerhard Schön ◽  
Daniel G. E. Thiem ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Trial ◽  
Orthognathic Surgery ◽  
Surgical Planning ◽  
Prospective Randomized Trial ◽  
Virtual Surgical Planning ◽  
Bimaxillary Orthognathic Surgery

Can virtual surgical planning influence sequencing in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery?

2019 ◽  
Vol 48 ◽  
pp. 111
Author(s):  
A.M. Borba ◽  
K.M. Silva ◽  
A.L.F. Silva ◽  
E.J. Silva ◽  
B.R. Noronha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Orthognathic Surgery ◽  
Surgical Planning ◽  
Virtual Surgical Planning ◽  
Bimaxillary Orthognathic Surgery

scholarly journals Accuracy of virtual surgical planning in segmental osteotomy in combination with bimaxillary orthognathic surgery with surgery first approach

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaowu Ying ◽  
Kaiyue Tian ◽  
Kaiyu Zhang ◽  
Xiaohui Ma ◽  
Hongming Guo
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Orthognathic Surgery ◽  
Surgical Planning ◽  
3D Model ◽  
Virtual Surgical Planning ◽  
Deviation Analysis ◽  
Bland Altman Method ◽  
Bimaxillary Orthognathic Surgery ◽  
Surgery First ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Background This study aimed to assess the accuracy of virtual surgical planning (VSP) in segmental osteotomy in combination with bimaxillary orthognathic surgery with surgery first approach (SFA) by means of three-dimensional (3D) measuring and superimposition, so as to promote the application of digital technology in combined orthodontic-orthognathic treatment. Methods 20 patients treated with segmental osteotomy in combination with bimaxillary orthognathic surgery with SFA from 2018 to 2020 were included. All of them acquired VSP performed by ProPlan CMF 3.0 software (Materialise Corporation, Belgium). The preoperative (T0) 3D model of VSP and the postoperative (T1) 3D model, reconstructed by the cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) data acquired one week after surgery, were compared by measuring the 3D coordinates of the landmarks as well as 3D model superimposition for deviation analysis. The deviation analysis was achieved by Geomagic Studio 2013 (3D Systems Corporation, USA). The differences which represented the accuracy of VSP were evaluated by the root mean square deviation (RMSD) and the Bland–Altman method. Results There was no statistically significant difference between the 3D coordinates of T1 and T0 (P > 0.05), and the mean overall RMSD was 1.37 mm, within the clinical relevance of 2 mm. The RMSD of sagittal direction (1.76 mm) was greater than that of coronal and vertical directions (1.09 mm and 1.24 mm), and the RMSD of maxillary and mandibular aspects were basically equal (1.30 mm and 1.45 mm). The Bland–Altman method showed the T0 and T1 measurements were in good agreement. The mean RMSD obtained from the deviation analysis was 1.85 mm, within the clinical relevance. Conclusions VSP in segmental osteotomy in combination with bimaxillary orthognathic surgery with SFA proved to acquire accurate outcome in this study.

Answer To The Authors: 3D virtual surgical planning for positioning and orientation of the maxilla in orthognathic surgery: Methodological issues on accuracy and agreement

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renata Hernandes Tonin ◽  
Liogi Iwaki Filho ◽  
Amanda Lury Yamashita ◽  
Flávio Wellington da Silva Ferraz ◽  
Elen de Souza Tolentino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Orthognathic Surgery ◽  
Surgical Planning ◽  
Methodological Issues ◽  
Virtual Surgical Planning

Comparison of condylar position in orthognathic surgery cases treated with virtual surgical planning vs. conventional model planning

2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (S1) ◽  
pp. 142-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ying Wan ◽  
Tate Jackson ◽  
Chooryung Chung ◽  
Fei Gao ◽  
George Blakey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Orthognathic Surgery ◽  
Surgical Planning ◽  
Conventional Model ◽  
Virtual Surgical Planning ◽  
Condylar Position

scholarly journals The Accuracy of Jaws Repositioning in Bimaxillary Orthognathic Surgery with Traditional Surgical Planning Compared to Digital Surgical Planning in Skeletal Class III Patients: A Retrospective Observational Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 1840
Author(s):  
Martina Barone ◽  
Alberto De Stefani ◽  
Ugo Baciliero ◽  
Giovanni Bruno ◽  
Antonio Gracco
Keyword(s):  
Orthognathic Surgery ◽  
Surgical Planning ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Skeletal Class ◽  
Bimaxillary Orthognathic Surgery ◽  
Cad Cam ◽  
Treatment Objective ◽  
Digital Methods ◽  
Cephalometric Measurements ◽  
Group D

Background: Technological progress has led to the transition to digital methods to perform surgical planning and to obtain surgical splints with CAD/CAM technologies. The present study aimed to compare the accuracy of jaw repositioning in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery using traditional and digital surgical planning in skeletal class III patients. Methods: This study included 60 skeletal class III patients divided into two groups based on the method used to perform surgical planning: traditional (T, n = 30) and digital (D, n = 30). For each patient, a 2D presurgical Visual Treatment Objective (VTO) was prepared and the outcome of the surgery was compared with that planned by using determined cephalometric measurements (ANB, SNA, SNB, Ar-Go-Me, S-Ar-Go). Statistical analysis showed that the measurements planned and those obtained after surgery were equivalent in Group D. For Group T, the analysis showed equivalence only for one of the considered measurements (ANB). By comparing the results of the two groups, Group D presented a lower level of error than Group T. Conclusions: Digital surgical planning performed significantly better in terms of accuracy of jaw repositioning than the traditional protocol.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document