Value and patient appreciation of follow-up after endoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair

Hernia ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 1033-1040
Author(s):  
W. J. Bakker ◽  
C. V. van Hessen ◽  
G. J. Clevers ◽  
E. J. M. M. Verleisdonk ◽  
J. P. J. Burgmans
2016 ◽  
Vol 82 (2) ◽  
pp. 112-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Malek Tabbara ◽  
Laurent Genser ◽  
Manuela Bossi ◽  
Maxime Barat ◽  
Claude Polliand ◽  
...  

To review our experience and outcomes after inguinal hernia repair using the lightweight self-adhering sutureless mesh “Adhesix™” and demonstrate the safety and efficacy of this mesh. This is a 3-year retrospective study that included 143 consecutive patients who underwent 149 inguinal hernia repairs at our department of surgery. All hernias were repaired using a modified Lichtenstein technique. Preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative data were prospectively collected. Incidence of chronic pain, postoperative complications, recurrence, and patient satisfaction were assessed three years postoperatively by conducting a telephone survey. We had 143 patients with a mean age of 58 years (17–84), who underwent 149 hernia repairs using the Adhesix™ mesh. Ninety-two per cent (131 patients) were males. Only 10 patients (7%) had a postoperative pain for more than three years. In our series, neither age nor gender was predictive of postoperative pain. Only one patient had a hematoma lasting for more than one month and only four patients (2.8%) had a recurrence of their hernia within three years of their initial surgery. Ninety per cent of the patient expressed their satisfaction when surveyed three years after their surgery. In conclusion, the use of the self-adhering sutureless mesh for inguinal hernia repair has been proving itself as effective as the traditional mesh. Adhesix™ is associated with low chronic pain rate, recurrence rate, and postoperative complications rate, and can be safely adopted as the sole technique for inguinal hernia repair.


1993 ◽  
Vol 28 (9) ◽  
pp. 1185-1187 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Koulack ◽  
P. Fitzgerald ◽  
D.A. Gillis ◽  
M. Giacomantonio

2003 ◽  
Vol 164 (7) ◽  
pp. 533-536 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick M. Vos ◽  
Maarten P. Simons ◽  
Jan S. K. Luitse ◽  
Dick van Geldere ◽  
Mark J. W. Koelemaij ◽  
...  

Hernia ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 361-367 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Mainik ◽  
G. Quast ◽  
R. Flade-Kuthe ◽  
A. Kuthe ◽  
F. Schroedl

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mustafa Hasbahceci ◽  
Fatih Basak ◽  
Aylin Acar ◽  
Orhan Alimoglu

Background. The exact nature of learning curve of totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia and the number required to master this technique remain controversial.Patients and Methods. We present a retrospective review of a single surgeon experience on patients who underwent totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair.Results. There were 42 hernias (22 left- and 20 right-sided) in 39 patients with a mean age of48.8±15.1years. Indirect, direct, and combined hernias were present in 18, 12, and 12 cases, respectively. The mean operative time was55.1±22.8minutes. Peritoneal injury occurred in 9 cases (21.4%). Conversion to open surgery was necessitated in 7 cases (16.7%). After grouping of all patients into two groups as cases between 1–21 and 22–42, it was seen that the majority of peritoneal injuries (7 out of 9, 77.8%,P=0.130) and all conversions (P=0.001) occurred in the first 21 cases.Conclusions. Learning curve of totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair can be divided into two consequent steps: immediate and late. At least 20 operations are required for gaining anatomical knowledge and surgical pitfalls based on the ability to perform this operation without conversion during immediate phase.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document