Comparison of perioperative outcomes between non-obese and obese patients undergoing robotic inguinal hernia repair: a propensity score matching analysis

Hernia ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. Y. Kudsi ◽  
N. Bou-Ayash ◽  
F. Gokcal
Keyword(s):  
Inguinal Hernia ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Hernia Repair ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Inguinal Hernia Repair ◽  
Perioperative Outcomes ◽  
Obese Patients ◽  
Propensity Score Matching Analysis ◽  
Robotic Inguinal Hernia Repair

scholarly journals P035 EMERGENCY BILATERAL GORIN HERNIA REPAIR IN UNILATERAL COMPLICATED INGUINAL HERNIA REAPIR WITH CONCOMITNAT CONTRALATERAL HERNIA. COHORTS COMPARATIVE OUTCOMES ANALYSIS USING PROPENSITY SCORE MATCHING

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alejandro Bravo-Salva ◽  
Francisco Rómulo Ochoa-Segarra ◽  
Ana María Gonzálz-Castillo ◽  
Joan Sancho-Insenser ◽  
Miguel Pera-Roman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Inguinal Hernia ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Hernia Repair ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Inguinal Hernia Repair ◽  
Morbidity And Mortality ◽  
High Morbidity ◽  
Bilateral Inguinal Hernia ◽  
Bilateral Hernia

Abstract Aim Aim of our study was to analyze outcomes and safety of bilateral inguinal hernia repair in unilateral groin complicated hernia with contralateral groin hernia. Material and Methods Retrospective cohorts study following STROBE statements on a prospective Emergency Surgery Department database. Inclusion criteria were: patients with emergency hernia repair from 2008 to 2018, 18 years old. Unilateral or bilateral inguinal hernia repair without other abdominal wall hernia repairs. Comparative analysis between two group unilateral hernia repair (UH) vs bilateral hernia repair (BH) those patients with unilateral complicated inguinal hernia with contralateral inguinal hernia. Propensity score matching (PSM) between groups was performed to eliminate statistically groups differences. Outcomes between groups were analyzed with special attention to postoperative morbimortality and hernia recurrence. Results 341 patients were included, 38(11.1%) were performed bilateral hernia repair. Groups differences were: higher rate of inguinoscrotal inguinal hernia (36.8 vs 22.8), prophylactic antibiotics use (94.7 vs 81.8) and general Anesthesia use (52.6% vs 50.2%). General high rates of morbidity and mortality were observed (5.9% and 41.9) and 22 (6.5%) hernia repair recurrence were detected. After PSM no differences between surgery outcomes groups were observed with similar morbidity, recurrence or hospital stay. Conclusions Emergency inguinal hernia repair has high morbidity and mortality rates in our experience. Emergency Bilateral inguinal hernia repair in context of hernia complication seems safe without recurrence or hospital stay increase.

scholarly journals Outcomes of open versus single-incision laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair using propensity score matching: A single institution experience

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. e0246189
Author(s):  
Kanghee Lee ◽  
Jin Ho Lee ◽  
Soomin Nam ◽  
Jae Uk Chong ◽  
Hyung Soon Lee
Keyword(s):  
Inguinal Hernia ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Hernia Repair ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Inguinal Hernia Repair ◽  
Open Repair ◽  
Single Incision ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Open Group ◽  
Totally Extraperitoneal

Purpose The aim of the current study was to compare the outcomes between open and single-incision laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (SILTEP) inguinal hernia repair. Methods To compare the outcomes between the open and SILTEP groups, we performed propensity score matching to adjust for significant differences in patient characteristics. The outcomes were compared between the matched groups. Results Record review identified 477 patients who had undergone inguinal hernia repair from November 2016 to November 2018. Seventy-one patients were excluded from the propensity score matching because of age <18, femoral hernia, conventional 3-port laparoscopic repair, incarcerated hernia, and combined operation. SILTEP in 142 and open repair in 264 patients were identified. After propensity score matching, these individuals were grouped into 82 pairs. Spinal anesthesia was administered more often in the open group than in the SILTEP group. Operation time was significantly longer in the SILTEP group than in the open group (49.6 ± 17.4 vs. 64.8 ± 28.4 min, p < 0.001). However, urinary retention rates of the open group were significantly higher than that of the SILTEP group (11.0% vs. 0%, p = 0.003). The SILTEP group showed significantly lower pain scores at postoperative 6, 12, and 24 hours, and significantly lower rates of intravenous analgesic requirements through postoperative day 1 (30.5% vs. 13.4%, p = 0.008) compared with the open group. Conclusion The outcomes of SILTEP repair were comparable to those of open repair. SILTEP repair may have advantages over open repair for reducing immediate postoperative pain (≤24 hours).

scholarly journals Robotic inguinal hernia repair: systematic review and meta‐analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amjad Qabbani ◽  
Omar M. Aboumarzouk ◽  
Tamer ElBakry ◽  
Abdulla Al‐Ansari ◽  
Mohamed S. Elakkad
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Inguinal Hernia ◽  
Hernia Repair ◽  
Inguinal Hernia Repair ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Robotic Inguinal Hernia Repair

Re-operation After Robotic Inguinal Hernia Repair

2019 ◽  
pp. 221-227
Author(s):  
Jordan A. Bilezikian ◽  
Robert G. Johnson ◽  
William W. Hope
Keyword(s):  
Inguinal Hernia ◽  
Hernia Repair ◽  
Inguinal Hernia Repair ◽  
Robotic Inguinal Hernia Repair
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document