Co-evolution of work structure and process in organizations: improvisation in post-disaster debris removal operations

Author(s):  
Xin Zhang ◽  
David Mendonça
Author(s):  
Xin Zhang ◽  
David Mendonça ◽  
Martha Grabowski ◽  
Christopher Holmes

Organizations are often called upon to restructure their work processes—and themselves—in nearly real-time to deal with unplanned-for contingencies. However, researchers are seldom present at the right place and time to deploy specialized instrumentation and thus capture appropriate data on these improvisations. Somewhat paradoxically, now more than ever, organizations are producing vast quantities of data on work process and structure. The goal of this work is to draw upon one such data set—on post-disaster recovery operations—to explore the interplay between improvised organizational structure and processes. The result of this work shows the pattern of organizational improvising behavior and elicits the relationship between ideation and decision making - two elemental processes of organizational improvisation. Future work directions are also discussed.


2015 ◽  
Vol 107 ◽  
pp. 154-167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Álvaro Lorca ◽  
Melih Çelik ◽  
Özlem Ergun ◽  
Pınar Keskinocak

2015 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melih Çelik ◽  
Özlem Ergun ◽  
Pınar Keskinocak

2009 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy Cook, BA

Public participation in a disaster debris removal process is an important component to any large-scale rebuilding effort. How, then, does such an effort progress when nearly two-thirds of the affected community’s population does not come back to participate? The City of New Orleans faced just such a situation after Hurricane Katrina and the catastrophic flooding that followed. The debris removal task is the largest in US history, and very few residents returned to participate in the cleanup. This article provides a further understanding of the impact that New Orleans’ missing population had on the city’s cleanup process. This article asserts that without this city’s residents (or first filters), the enormous debris removal effort in New Orleans was further slowed and complicated. The first two sections provide background and context, identifying the size and scope of the disaster, the low residential return rate, and the role of public participation in previous large-scale debris removal efforts. The next three sections focus on the disaster debris itself, identifying specific ways in which the missing population further complicated New Orleans’ cleanup efforts with regard to (a) the duration of the debris removal process, (b) the volume of debris, and (c) the contamination of debris.The final section considers various measures that emergency planners and managers can take to facilitate “participatory repopulation,” thus mitigating the complications of a missing population.


Author(s):  
Robert McCreight ◽  
Wayne Harrop

Abstract Despite decades of genuine experience derived from major disasters, emergency exercises and expert reviews of crisis events in reports and after action summaries it seems we know far less about post disaster restoration and recovery than we should. This shortfall presents several challenges to public policy, governance and the practice of emergency management as the specific steps, requirements, connections, issues and interdependencies in resurrecting a severely damaged city goes far beyond cleanup and routine debris removal tasks. Approaches towards restoration and recovery differ between the USA and the UK but there is equal regard for deriving as much insight as possible from post disaster imperatives by deliberately exercising what is seldom examined – the raw details and demands of city and community recovery. One suggested avenue is to expand future emergency exercises by focusing on how better to understand and execute the variety of restoration and recovery activies needed and devote less energy to traditional emergency response measures. This would invite testing emergency management leaders and experts with demanding 'maximum of maximum' scenarios to analyze the depth, challenges and complexity involved.


2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 1076-1091 ◽  
Author(s):  
Álvaro Lorca ◽  
Melih Çelik ◽  
Özlem Ergun ◽  
Pınar Keskinocak

2012 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary Fetter ◽  
Terry Rakes

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document