Is there a relationship between spinal instability in neoplastic disease and Tokuhashi scoring system?

2016 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 519-524 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matheus Fernandes de Oliveira ◽  
Jose Marcus Rotta ◽  
Ricardo Vieira Botelho
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xingchen Yao ◽  
Xiangjun Shi ◽  
Ziyu Xu ◽  
Jie Tan ◽  
Yanzhe Wei ◽  
...  

Abstract Background A spinal stability scoring system for multiple myeloma (MM) was established via evidence-based literature and expert advice, and it was used to evaluate spinal stability in multiple myeloma patients. Methods The Delphi method was used to establish an expert consensus and establish a spinal stability scoring system for multiple myeloma. The clinical data of 72 patients with multiple myeloma with spinal involvement in our hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Results The grading system included 6 first-level indicators and 29 second-class indicators; the 6 first-level indicators were the following: the position of the spinal lesions, the degree of pain, the number of segments involved in the spinal lesions, the changes in the spinal images, the complications and the neurological function. After weighting the significance of the indicators, the highest total score possible was 24; a score of 0–10 corresponded to stable, 11–17 corresponded to potentially unstable, and 18–24 corresponded to unstable. Conclusion The scoring system, which is based on the disease characteristics, typical symptoms and spinal imaging manifestations in multiple myeloma patients, can be used to guide clinicians in evaluating the spinal stability of MM patients and determining the spinal instability caused by multiple myeloma over time, thereby providing evidence for MM patients to choose protective interventions. Trial registration: As this was a retrospective study, it did not require ethical approval.


2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 499-506 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeff Ehresman ◽  
Andrew Schilling ◽  
Zach Pennington ◽  
Chengcheng Gui ◽  
Xuguang Chen ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVEVertebral compression fractures (VCFs) in patients with spinal metastasis can lead to destabilization and often carry a high risk profile. It is therefore important to have tools that enable providers to predict the occurrence of new VCFs. The most widely used tool for bone quality assessment, dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), is not often available at a patient’s initial presentation and has limited sensitivity. While the Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS) has been associated with VCFs, it does not take patients’ baseline bone quality into consideration. To address this, the authors sought to develop an MRI-based scoring system to estimate trabecular vertebral bone quality (VBQ) and to assess this system’s ability to predict the occurrence of new VCFs in patients with spinal metastasis.METHODSCases of adult patients with a diagnosis of spinal metastasis, who had undergone stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to the spine or neurosurgical intervention at a single institution between 2012 and 2019, were retrospectively reviewed. The novel VBQ score was calculated for each patient by dividing the median signal intensity of the L1–4 vertebral bodies by the signal intensity of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify associations of demographic, clinical, and radiological data with new VCFs.RESULTSAmong the 105 patients included in this study, 56 patients received a diagnosis of a new VCF and 49 did not. On univariable analysis, the factors associated with new VCFs were smoking status, steroid use longer than 3 months, the SINS, and the novel scoring system—the VBQ score. On multivariable analysis, only the SINS and VBQ score were significant predictors of new VCFs and, when combined, had a predictive accuracy of 89%.CONCLUSIONSAs a measure of bone quality, the novel VBQ score significantly predicted the occurrence of new VCFs in patients with spinal metastases independent of the SINS. This suggests that baseline bone quality is a crucial factor that requires assessment when evaluating these patients’ conditions and that the VBQ score is a novel and simple MRI-based measure to accomplish this.


Spine ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 35 (22) ◽  
pp. E1221-E1229 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles G. Fisher ◽  
Christian P. DiPaola ◽  
Timothy C. Ryken ◽  
Mark H. Bilsky ◽  
Christopher I. Shaffrey ◽  
...  

1979 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 241-245
Author(s):  
Richard J. Schissel ◽  
Linda B. James

This study examines the assumptions underlying the scoring system of the Arizona Articulation Proficiency Scale: Revised. Twenty-one children between the ages of four years two months and six years 11 months were administered the Arizona Articulation Proficiency Scale: Revised and the Screening Deep Test of Articulation. The subjects' performance on the two tests was compared for the phones: [s], [l], [r], [t∫], [θ], [∫], [k], [f], and [t]. Results suggested that 1) the production of most sounds in only two contexts does not necessarily reflect the accuracy of production of those sounds in other contexts, and 2) for the sounds tested, the weightings assigned on the basis of their frequency of occurrence rather than the frequency with which they were misarticulated overestimated the extent of many articulation errors.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document