scholarly journals Anterior cruciate ligament integrity in osteoarthritis of the knee in patients undergoing total knee replacement

2010 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 149-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. J. M. Douglas ◽  
J. D. Hutchison ◽  
A. G. Sutherland

This chapter contains practice questions based on a broad range of orthopaedic topics that may be encountered within the ‘Adult Pathology’ station of the FRCS (Trauma and Orthopaedics) viva examination. The knee topics covered include: osteoarthritis, primary total knee replacement (TKR), painful TKR, revision TKR, and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture among other conditions.


Author(s):  
Robert Redelbach ◽  
Alexander Mahnke ◽  
Jens O. Anders

Abstract Purpose In spite of consistent improvement in operative methods for total knee arthroplasty, individual motor deficits may lead to a lower outcome. The preoperative classification in individual motoric capacity may get more significance for the future. Complementary to established questionnaires and clinical tests, this pilot study should demonstrate that it is possible to generate a preoperative motor score using a force platform measurement (KMP). Compared to questionnaires the new score represents digital values suitable for everyday clinical use. Methods In total 63 Patients were randomized selected on the day before a bicondylar total knee replacement. A mobile force platform KMP (Motosana) measured the parameter maximum force, power and balance. Fluctuation area was measured in mm² and fluctuation path in mm. One leg standing without holding, transient help or permanent holding at armrests were registered. The force (Newton) was measured while a modified cross lift exercise and power (Watt) by performing five squads. Results Based on comprehensive statistical consolidated data of maximum force, power and balance it was possible to create a new motor score “Knie Fit 1.0”. Depending on interindividual performance patients were divided into those with higher or lower results. Regarding to their individual motor proprioceptive capacity we could also graduate patients into 4 different groups for force/power and balance. In total 17 of 63 patients offered a complex motor deficit, but on the other hand 17 different patients showed superior results in all categories. Conclusion It is possible to measure the motor capacity of patients using the mobile force platform (KMP) in everyday clinical practice. Based on this data a new motor score “KnieFit 1.0” was generated and groups of patients with different insufficiencies were created. Further follow-up studies should proof and compare the pre- and postoperative outcome in this field. With “KnieFit 1.0” it may be possible to create an individual perioperative rehabilitation program for compensation of detected deficits.


2012 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 64-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. A. Ritter ◽  
K. E. Davis ◽  
J. B. Meding ◽  
A. Farris

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (14) ◽  
pp. 3339-3346 ◽  
Author(s):  
Line Lindanger ◽  
Torbjørn Strand ◽  
Anders Odd Mølster ◽  
Eirik Solheim ◽  
Eivind Inderhaug

Background: Rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is a common and feared injury among athletes because of its potential effect on further sports participation. Reported rates of return to pivoting sports after ACL reconstruction (ACLR) vary in the literature, and the long-term consequences of returning have rarely been studied. Purpose: To examine the rate and level of return to pivoting sports after ACLR, the duration of sports participation, and long-term consequences of returning to pivoting sports. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: All primary ACLRs with a bone–patellar tendon–bone autograft between 1987 and 1994 (N = 234) in athletes participating in team handball, basketball, or soccer before injury were selected from a single-center quality database. A long-term evaluation (median, 25 years; range, 22-30 years) was performed using a questionnaire focusing on return to pivoting sports, the duration of sports activity after surgery, later contralateral ACL injuries, revision surgery, and knee replacement surgery. Participants were stratified into 2 groups depending on the time between injury and surgery (early, <24 months; late, ≥24 months). Results: A total of 93% of patients (n = 217) responded to the questionnaire. Although 83% of patients returned to pivoting sports after early ACLR, only 53% returned to preinjury level. Similar return-to-sport rates were observed in males and females ( P > .05), but males had longer sports careers (median, 10 years; range, 1-23 years) than females (median, 4 years; range, 1-25 years; P < .001). The incidence of contralateral ACL injuries was 28% among athletes who returned to sports versus 4% among athletes who did not return ( P = .017) after early ACLR. The pooled reinjury rate after return to preinjury level of sports was 41% (30%, contralateral injuries; 11%, revision surgery). The incidence of contralateral ACL injuries was 32% among females versus 23% among males ( P > .05) and, for revision surgery, was 12% among females versus 7% among males ( P > .05) after returning to sports. Having a late ACLR was associated with an increased risk of knee replacement surgery (9% vs 3%; P = .049) when compared with having an early ACLR. Conclusion: ACLR does not necessarily enable a return to preinjury sports participation. By returning to pivoting sports after ACLR, athletes are also facing a high risk of contralateral ACL injuries. Long-term evaluations in risk assessments after ACLR are important, as a significant number of subsequent ACL injuries occur later than the routine follow-up.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document