scholarly journals Contrast Detail Phantom Comparison on a Commercially Available Unit. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) versus Full-Field Digital Mammography (FFDM)

2010 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 58-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Bertolini ◽  
Andrea Nitrosi ◽  
Giovanni Borasi ◽  
Andrea Botti ◽  
Davide Tassoni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Digital Mammography ◽  
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis ◽  
Breast Tomosynthesis ◽  
Full Field ◽  
Full Field Digital Mammography

scholarly journals Visualization of Breast Microcalcifications on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and 2-Dimensional Digital Mammography Using Specimens

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 117822341770338 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jieun Byun ◽  
Jee Eun Lee ◽  
Eun Suk Cha ◽  
Jin Chung ◽  
Jeoung Hyun Kim
Keyword(s):  
Image Quality ◽  
Digital Mammography ◽  
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis ◽  
Kappa Statistic ◽  
Breast Tomosynthesis ◽  
Full Field ◽  
Full Field Digital Mammography ◽  
Better Than

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to compare the visibility of microcalcifications of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and full-field digital mammography (FFDM) using breast specimens. Materials And Methods: Thirty-one specimens’ DBT and FFDM were retrospectively reviewed by four readers. Results: The image quality of microcalcifications of DBT was rated as superior or equivalent in 71.0% by reader 1, 67.8% by reader 2, 64.5% by reader 3, and 80.6% by reader 4. The Fleiss kappa statistic for agreement among readers was 0.31. Conclusions: We suggest that image quality of DBT appears to be comparable with or better than FFDM in terms of revealing microcalcifications.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document