scholarly journals Predictive Association of Low- and High-Fidelity Supported Employment Programs with Multiple Outcomes in a Real-World Setting: A Prospective Longitudinal Multi-site Study

Author(s):  
Sosei Yamaguchi ◽  
Sayaka Sato ◽  
Takuma Shiozawa ◽  
Asami Matsunaga ◽  
Yasutaka Ojio ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose The individual placement and support (IPS) model of supported employment is a leading evidence-based practice in community mental health services. In Japan, individualized supported employment that is highly informed by the philosophy of the IPS model has been implemented. While there is a body of evidence demonstrating the association between program fidelity and the proportion of participants gaining competitive employment, the association between fidelity and a wider set of vocational and individual outcomes has received limited investigation. This study aimed to assess whether high-fidelity individualized supported employment programs were superior to low-fidelity programs in terms of vocational outcomes, preferred job acquisition, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Methods A prospective longitudinal study with 24-month follow-up analyzed 16 individualized supported employment programs. The Japanese version of the individualized Supported Employment Fidelity scale (JiSEF) was used to assess the structural quality of supported employment programs (scores: low-fidelity program, ≤ 90; high-fidelity program, ≥ 91). Job acquisition, work tenure, work earnings, job preference matching (e.g., occupation type, salary, and illness disclosure), and PROMs such as the INSPIRE and WHO-Five Well-being index were compared between groups. Results There were 75 and 127 participants in the low-fidelity group (k = 6) and high-fidelity group (k = 10), respectively. The high-fidelity group demonstrated better vocational outcomes than the low-fidelity group, i.e., higher competitive job acquisition (71.7% versus 38.7%, respectively, adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 3.6, p = 0.002), longer work tenure (adjusted mean difference = 140.8, p < 0.001), and better match for illness disclosure preference (92.6% versus 68.0%, respectively, aOR = 5.9, p = 0.003). However, we found no differences between groups in other preference matches or PROM outcomes. Conclusion High-fidelity individualized supported employment programs resulted in good vocational outcomes in a real-world setting. However, enhancing service quality to increase desired job acquisition and improve PROMs will be important in the future. Clinical Trial Registration UMIN000025648

2004 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 401-406 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric A. Latimer ◽  
Philip W. Bush ◽  
Deborah R. Becker ◽  
Robert E. Drake ◽  
Gary R. Bond

2017 ◽  
Vol 205 (4) ◽  
pp. 275-282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc Corbière ◽  
Tania Lecomte ◽  
Daniel Reinharz ◽  
Bonnie Kirsh ◽  
Paula Goering ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 342-354 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc Corbière ◽  
Sara Zaniboni ◽  
Tania Lecomte ◽  
Gary Bond ◽  
Pierre-Yves Gilles ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 351-357 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deborah R. Becker ◽  
Gary R. Bond ◽  
Daniel McCarthy ◽  
Daniel Thompson ◽  
Haiyi Xie ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 232-239 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth L. Gowdy ◽  
Linda S. Carlson ◽  
Charles A. Rapp

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document