Meta-Analyses of Fraternal and Sororal Birth Order Effects in Homosexual Pedophiles, Hebephiles, and Teleiophiles

Author(s):  
Ray Blanchard ◽  
Klaus M. Beier ◽  
Francisco R. Gómez Jiménez ◽  
Dorit Grundmann ◽  
Jurian Krupp ◽  
...  
2007 ◽  
Vol 150 (2) ◽  
pp. 199-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abraham Reichenberg ◽  
Christopher Smith ◽  
James Schmeidler ◽  
Jeremy M. Silverman

2015 ◽  
Vol 235 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-60
Author(s):  
Martina Eschelbach

Summary This paper contributes to the literature on the determinants of children’s human capital by analyzing the effects of birth order in Germany. These effects are typically attributed to sibling rivalry for parental resources. For our analysis we use data collected as part of the German Life History Study on birth cohorts 1946-1977. We find a substantial positive impact of being first born on the probability of completing higher secondary education. Analyzing gender differences, we find stronger effects for boys. Furthermore, birth order effects are more prevailing in small families. The results are discussed against the background of equal opportunities in the German educational system.


1986 ◽  
Vol 47 (6) ◽  
pp. 495-497 ◽  
Author(s):  
N L Keltner ◽  
C W McIntyre ◽  
R Gee

Author(s):  
Martin Arstad Isungset ◽  
Mats Lillehagen ◽  
Elisabeth Ugreninov

Abstract Birth order causes social inequality between siblings. In Western countries, earlier-born perform better than later-born. In non-Western countries, however, earlier-born generally perform worse than later-born. We use administrative data to compare birth order effects between the native population and Norwegian-born children of immigrants (450,864 individuals nested within 202,191 families). The outcome is based on lower secondary school points—a combined measurement of all marks at the end of compulsory education. We found negative effects of birth order on school points for Norwegian natives. This finding is in line with previous studies from Western countries using measures of educational achievement. Birth order effects amongst Norwegian-born children of immigrant parents vary according to maternal country of origin, with some displaying similar effects as natives and others displaying no birth order effects. These findings are surprising in light of the main theories on birth order, which are universalistic and do not predict group-differences. We argue that the universalistic theories need to be supplemented to account for our findings, and discuss the potential importance of cultural variation in family-related behaviours such as strategic parenting, kindergarten attendance, and peer-influence in high-achieving immigrant groups.


2009 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 342-349 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Eckstein ◽  
Mark A. Sperber ◽  
Kristen Aycock Miller
Keyword(s):  

1985 ◽  
Vol 144 (1) ◽  
pp. 88-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
John S. H. Tay ◽  
William C. L. Yip ◽  
Roy Joseph ◽  
H. B. Wong

2000 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 157-159
Author(s):  
Ray Blanchard

In my comments on Townsend's detailed critique of Sulloway's (1996) book, I want to make two general points about birth order research. The first is that several authors—including Ernst and Angst (1983), who are extensively quoted by Townsend—have concluded that the effects of birth order on adult personality and behavior are either completely nonexistent or else so negligible as to be useless to science. I agree that the methodology of birth order studies is often flawed, and that many, if not most, of their findings are probably irreproducible. However, an assertion that birth order has no effect on adult behavior would be as extreme in its way as the assertion that birth order's effect on behavior is decisive. My own research demonstrates that a categorical dismissal of any and all birth order effects is not only premature but demonstrably erroneous.


Demography ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 57 (5) ◽  
pp. 1625-1646
Author(s):  
Mats Lillehagen ◽  
Martin Arstad Isungset

Abstract A substantial amount of research shows that younger siblings perform worse than their older sisters and brothers in several socioeconomic outcomes, including educational achievement. Most of these studies examined stable families and excluded half-siblings. However, the increasing prevalence of multipartnered fertility implies that many children grow up in nonnuclear families. We examine whether there is evidence for birth order effects in this context, which offers an opportunity to test and potentially expand the explanatory scope of the two main theories on birth order effects. We use comprehensive Norwegian registry data to study siblings in the 1985–1998 cohorts born to mothers or fathers who parented children with at least two partners. We provide evidence for negative effects of birth order on lower secondary school grades in both cases. Children born to fathers displaying multipartnered fertility tend to have lower grades than older full siblings but perform more similarly or better compared with older half-siblings. For siblings born to mothers with the multipartnered fertility pattern, later-born siblings do worse in school compared with all older siblings. This indicates that negative birth order effects tend to operate either within or across sets of full siblings, depending on the sex of the parent displaying multipartnered fertility. We argue that these findings can be explained by a combination of resource dilution/confluence theory and sex differences in residential arrangements following union dissolutions. We also suggest an alternative interpretation: maternal resources could be more important for generating negative birth order effects.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document