Discrepancy between FDG-PET/CT and contrast-enhanced CT in the staging of patients with inflammatory breast cancer: implications for treatment planning

2020 ◽  
Vol 181 (2) ◽  
pp. 383-390 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather A. Jacene ◽  
Pamela J. DiPiro ◽  
Jennifer Bellon ◽  
Jiani Hu ◽  
Su-Chun Cheng ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (16) ◽  
pp. 1889-1897 ◽  
Author(s):  
Malene Grubbe Hildebrandt ◽  
Oke Gerke ◽  
Christina Baun ◽  
Kirsten Falch ◽  
Jeanette Ansholm Hansen ◽  
...  

Purpose To prospectively investigate the diagnostic accuracy of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) with dual-time-point imaging, contrast-enhanced CT (ceCT), and bone scintigraphy (BS) in patients with suspected breast cancer recurrence. Patients and Methods One hundred women with suspected recurrence of breast cancer underwent 1-hour and 3-hour FDG-PET/CT, ceCT, and BS within approximately 10 days. The study was powered to estimate the precision of the individual imaging tests. Images were visually interpreted using a four-point assessment scale, and readers were blinded to other test results. The reference standard was biopsy along with treatment decisions and clinical follow-up (median, 17 months). Results FDG-PET/CT resulted in no false negatives and fewer false positives than the other imaging techniques. Accuracy of results were similar for 1-hour and 3-hour FDG-PET/CT. For distant recurrence, the area under the receiver operating curve was 0.99 (95% CI, 0.97 to 1) for FDG-PET/CT, 0.84 (95% CI, 0.73 to 0.94) for ceCT, and 0.86 (95% CI, 0.77 to 0.94) for the combined ceCT+BS. Of 100 patients, 22 (22%) were verified with distant recurrence, and 18 of these had bone involvement. Nineteen patients (19%) had local recurrence only. In exploratory analyses, diagnostic accuracy of FDG-PET/CT was better than ceCT alone or ceCT combined with BS in diagnosing distant, bone, and local recurrence, shown by a greater area under the receiver operating curve and higher sensitivity, specificity, and superior likelihood ratios. Conclusion FDG-PET/CT was accurate in diagnosing recurrence in breast cancer patients. It allowed for distant recurrence to be correctly ruled out and resulted in only a small number of false-positive cases. Exploratory findings suggest that FDG-PET/CT has greater accuracy than conventional imaging technologies in this patient group.


2013 ◽  
Vol 40 (8) ◽  
pp. 1206-1213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurence Champion ◽  
Florence Lerebours ◽  
Pascal Cherel ◽  
Veronique Edeline ◽  
Anne-Laure Giraudet ◽  
...  

Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 1198
Author(s):  
Jean-Baptiste Le Goubey ◽  
Charline Lasnon ◽  
Ines Nakouri ◽  
Laure Césaire ◽  
Michel de Pontville ◽  
...  

Aim: To perform a comprehensive analysis of discordances between contrast-enhanced CT (ceCT) and 18F-FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of the extra-cerebral treatment monitoring in patients with stage IV melanoma. Materials and methods: We conducted a retrospective monocentric observational study over a 3-year period in patients referred for 18F-FDG PET/CT and ceCT in the framework of therapy monitoring of immune checkpoint (ICIs) as of January 2017. Imaging reports were analyzed by two physicians in consensus. The anatomical site responsible for discordances, as well as induced changes in treatment were noted. Results: Eighty patients were included and 195 pairs of scans analyzed. Overall, discordances occurred in 65 cases (33%). Eighty percent of the discordances (52/65) were due to 18F-FDG PET/CT scans upstaging the patient. Amongst these discordances, 17/52 (33%) led to change in patient’s management, the most frequent being radiotherapy of a progressing site. ceCT represented 13/65 (20%) of discordances and induced changes in patients’ management in 2/13 cases (15%). The most frequent anatomical site involved was subcutaneous for 18F-FDG PET/CT findings and lung or liver for ceCT. Conclusions: Treatment monitoring with 18F-FDG PET/CT is more efficient than ceCT and has a greater impact in patient’s management.


2014 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 472-477 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edwin E.G.W. ter Voert ◽  
Hanneke W.M. van Laarhoven ◽  
Peter J.M. Kok ◽  
Wim J.G. Oyen ◽  
Eric P. Visser ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 157 (3) ◽  
pp. 439-447 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua K. Cho ◽  
Thomas J. Ow ◽  
Andrew Y. Lee ◽  
Richard V. Smith ◽  
Nicolas F. Schlecht ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (6) ◽  
pp. 890-906 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. Schillaci ◽  
L. Travascio ◽  
F. Bolacchi ◽  
F. Calabria ◽  
C. Bruni ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Guang-Yu Li ◽  
Ju-Lu Hong ◽  
Si-Yun Wang ◽  
Zhi Xie ◽  
En-Tao Liu ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. e149-e156 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marn Joon Park ◽  
Jungsu S. Oh ◽  
Jong-Lyel Roh ◽  
Jae Seung Kim ◽  
Jeong Hyun Lee ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 37 (5) ◽  
pp. 453-459 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renaud Guignard ◽  
Marija Simukoniene ◽  
Valentina Garibotto ◽  
Osman Ratib

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document