Echocardiographic discrepancies in severity grading of aortic valve stenosis with left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) cut-off values in an Asian population

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 615-621 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas W. S. Chew ◽  
Jinghao Nicholas Ngiam ◽  
Benjamin Yong-Qiang Tan ◽  
Ching-Hui Sia ◽  
Hui Wen Sim ◽  
...  
Children ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
pp. 69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gautam K. Singh

Aortic valve stenosis in children is a congenital heart defect that causes fixed form of hemodynamically significant left ventricular outflow tract obstruction with progressive course. Neonates and young infants who have aortic valve stenosis, usually develop congestive heart failure. Children and adolescents who have aortic valve stenosis, are mostly asymptomatic, although they may carry a small but significant risk of sudden death. Transcatheter or surgical intervention is indicated for symptomatic patients or those with moderate to severe left ventricular outflow tract obstruction. Many may need reintervention.


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
N Chew ◽  
N Ngiam ◽  
B Y Q Tan ◽  
H W Sim ◽  
W K F Kong ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives Inconsistencies in grading of aortic stenosis (AS) severity have been reported based on measurement of left ventricular outflow tract diameter (LVOTd), but this remains to be studied in an Asian population. We investigated consistency of grading AS severity at various LVOTd, and subsequently postulated alternative cut-offs for more consistent grading of AS severity. Methods 350 consecutive patients with index echocardiographic diagnosis of severe AS were divided them into three groups based on LVOTd: “small” (<20mm), “average” (20–22mm), “large” (>22mm). In each group, the consistency of flow-dependent (transaortic mean pressure gradient (MG)) and flow-independent parameters (AVA) were used for classification of AS severity. Results Of 350 patients, 51.7% had small LVOTd, while 30.8% and 17.5% had average and large LVOTd respectively. Consistent grading by LVOTd based on AVA and MG, was seen in 33.7% of patients with small, 47.6% with average, 57.7% with large LVOTd. When the hypothetical AVA cut-off of 0.9cm2 was used, consistent grading improved to 38.0% in small, 56.5% in average and 70% in large LVOTd. At an AVA cut-off of 0.8cm2, there was further incremental improvement in the small LVOTd group to 54.1% (p<0.05). Table 1. Consistent grading by LVOTd based on current guidelines Small LVOTd (<20mm, n=181) Average LVOTd (20–22mm, n=108) Large LVOTd (>22mm, n=61) Consistent grading AVA < cut-off MG >40 Consistency (%) Consistent grading AVA < cut-off MG >40 Consistency (%) Consistent grading AVA < cut-off MG >40 Consistency (%) n=61 33.7 n=51 47.6 n=35 57.7 n=69 38 n=61 56.5 n=43 70* n=98 54.1*+ n=70 65.1* n=43 70.8* *p-value <0.05 when compared with AVA cut-off 0.8cm2 for each LVOTd category; +p-value <0.05 when compared with AVA cut-off 0.9cm2 for each LVOTd category. Figure 1 Conclusion Current severe AS guidelines are most consistent with those in the large LVOTd group. However, the majority of the study's Asian population is in the small LVOTd group, which is the group most susceptible to discrepancy in AS grading. Improved consistency in echocardiographic grading may be attained with a lower AVA cut-off in this Asian cohort.


2005 ◽  
Vol 15 (S1) ◽  
pp. 27-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alfred Asante-Korang ◽  
Robert H. Anderson

The previous reviews in this section of our Supplement1,2 have summarized the anatomic components of the ventriculo-arterial junctions, and then assessed the echocardiographic approach to the ventriculo-arterial junction or junctions as seen in the morphologically right ventricle. In this complementary review, we discuss the echocardiographic assessment of the comparable components found in the morphologically left ventricle, specifically the outflow tract and the arterial root. We will address the echocardiographic anatomy of the aortic valvar complex, and we will review the causes of congenital arterial valvar stenosis, using the aortic valve as our example. We will also review the various lesions that, in the outflow of the morphologically left ventricle, can produce subvalvar and supravalvar stenosis. We will then consider the salient features of the left ventricular outflow tract in patients with discordant ventriculo-arterial connections, and double outlet ventricles. To conclude the review, we will briefly address some rarer anomalies that involve the left ventricular outflow tract, showing how the transesophageal echocardiogram is used to assist the surgeon preparing for repair. The essence of the approach will be to consider the malformations as seen at valvar, subvalvar, or supravalvar levels,1 but we should not lose sight of the fact that aortic coarctation or interruption, hypoplasia of the left heart, and malformations of the mitral valve are all part of the spectrum of lesions associated with obstruction to the left ventricular outflow tract. These additional malformations, however, are beyond the scope of this review.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document