Partial Hedging of American Claims in a Discrete Market

2014 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 592-601
Author(s):  
A. I. Soloviev
Keyword(s):  
2009 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 331-346
Author(s):  
Jungmin Choi ◽  
Mattias Jonsson

2013 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 271-299 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianfa Cong ◽  
Ken Seng Tan ◽  
Chengguo Weng

AbstractHedging is one of the most important topics in finance. When a financial market is complete, every contingent claim can be hedged perfectly to eliminate any potential future obligations. When the financial market is incomplete, the investor may eliminate his risk exposure by superhedging. In practice, both hedging strategies are not satisfactory due to their high implementation costs, which erode the chance of making any profit. A more practical and desirable strategy is to resort to the partial hedging, which hedges the future obligation only partially. The quantile hedging of Föllmer and Leukert (Finance and Stochastics, vol. 3, 1999, pp. 251–273), which maximizes the probability of a successful hedge for a given budget constraint, is an example of the partial hedging. Inspired by the principle underlying the partial hedging, this paper proposes a general partial hedging model by minimizing any desirable risk measure of the total risk exposure of an investor. By confining to the value-at-risk (VaR) measure, analytic optimal partial hedging strategies are derived. The optimal partial hedging strategy is either a knock-out call strategy or a bull call spread strategy, depending on the admissible classes of hedging strategies. Our proposed VaR-based partial hedging model has the advantage of its simplicity and robustness. The optimal hedging strategy is easy to determine. Furthermore, the structure of the optimal hedging strategy is independent of the assumed market model. This is in contrast to the quantile hedging, which is sensitive to the assumed model as well as the parameter values. Extensive numerical examples are provided to compare and contrast our proposed partial hedging to the quantile hedging.


2010 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 447-474 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan Dolinsky ◽  
Yonathan Iron ◽  
Yuri Kifer

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-17
Author(s):  
Patrice Gaillardetz ◽  
Saeb Hachem ◽  
Mehran Moghtadai

Abstract Throughout the past couple of decades, the surge in the sale of equity-linked products has led to many discussions on the evaluation and risk management of surrender options embedded in these products. However, most studies treat such options as American/Bermudian style options. In this article, a different approach is presented where only a portion of the policyholders react optimally due to the belief that not all policyholders are rational. Through this method, a probability of surrender is obtained based on the option moneyness and the product is partially hedged using local risk-control strategies. This partial hedging approach is versatile since few assumptions are required for the financial framework. To compare the different surrender assumptions, the initial capital requirement for an equity-linked product is obtained under a regime-switching equity model. Numerical examples illustrate the dynamics and efficiency of this hedging approach.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document