Delayed Bleeding Rate According to the Forrest Classification in Second-Look Endoscopy After Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

2015 ◽  
Vol 60 (10) ◽  
pp. 3108-3117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shin Na ◽  
Ji Yong Ahn ◽  
Kee Don Choi ◽  
Mi-Young Kim ◽  
Jeong Hoon Lee ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 08 (11) ◽  
pp. E1654-E1663
Author(s):  
Hideharu Ogiyama ◽  
Takuya Inoue ◽  
Akira Maekawa ◽  
Shunsuke Yoshii ◽  
Shinjiro Yamaguchi ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and study aims In patients receiving antithrombotic therapy, the risks of delayed bleeding after endoscopic procedures for gastrointestinal neoplasms become a major problem. Few reports have shown the effects of delayed bleeding in patients taking anticoagulants after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). This study aimed to evaluate the delayed bleeding events after colorectal ESD in patients receiving anticoagulant therapy. Patients and methods We retrospectively analyzed 87 patients taking anticoagulants who underwent colorectal ESD from April 2012 to December 2017 at 13 Japanese institutions participating in the Osaka Gut Forum. Among these patients, warfarin users were managed with heparin bridge therapy (HBT), continued use of warfarin, a temporary switch to direct oral anticoagulation (DOAC), or withdrawal of warfarin, and DOAC users were managed with DOAC discontinuation with or without HBT. We investigated the occurrence rate of delayed bleeding and compared the rates between warfarin and DOAC users. Results The delayed bleeding rate was 17.2 % among all patients. The delayed bleeding rate was higher in DOAC users than in warfarin users (23.3 % vs. 11.4 %, P = 0.14), although no statistically significant difference was observed. In DOAC users, the delayed bleeding rates for dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban users appeared similar (30 %, 18.2 %, 22.2 %, and 25 %, respectively). The onset of delayed bleeding in both warfarin and DOAC users was late, averaging 6.9 and 9.4 days, respectively. Conclusions Among patients taking anticoagulants, the risk of delayed bleeding after colorectal ESD was relatively high and the onset of delayed bleeding was late.


2016 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 273-281 ◽  
Author(s):  
Duk Su Kim ◽  
Yunho Jung ◽  
Ho Sung Rhee ◽  
Su Jin Lee ◽  
Yeong Geol Jo ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 561-567 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shoko Ono ◽  
Masayoshi Ono ◽  
Manabu Nakagawa ◽  
Yuichi Shimizu ◽  
Mototsugu Kato ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Minami Hashimoto ◽  
Waku Hatta ◽  
Yosuke Tsuji ◽  
Toshiyuki Yoshio ◽  
Yohei Yabuuchi ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
João Santos-Antunes ◽  
Margarida Marques ◽  
Rui Morais ◽  
Fátima Carneiro ◽  
Guilherme Macedo

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a well-established endoscopic technique for the treatment of gastrointestinal lesions. Colorectal ESD outcomes are less reported in the Western literature, and Portuguese data are still very scarce. Our aim was to describe our experience on colorectal ESD regarding its outcomes and safety profile. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We conducted a retrospective evaluation of recorded data on ESDs performed between 2015 and 2020. Only ESDs performed on epithelial neoplastic lesions were selected for further analysis. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Of a total of 167 colorectal ESDs, 153 were included. Technical success was achieved in 147 procedures (96%). The lesions were located in the colon (<i>n</i> = 24) and rectum (<i>n</i> = 123). The en bloc resection rate was 92% and 97%, the R0 resection rate was 83% and 82%, and the curative resection rate was 79% and 78% for the colon and the rectum, respectively. The need for a hybrid technique was the only risk factor for piecemeal or R1 resection. We report a perforation rate of 3.4% and a 4.1% rate of delayed bleeding; all the adverse events were manageable endoscopically, without the need of blood transfusions or surgery. Most of the lesions were laterally spreading tumours of the granular mixed type (70%), and 20% of the lesions were malignant (12% submucosal and 8% intramucosal cancer). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Our series on colorectal ESD reports a very good efficacy and safety profile. This technique can be applied by endoscopists experienced in ESD.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document