A Critical Review of the Research on the Extreme Male Brain Theory and Digit Ratio (2D:4D)

2013 ◽  
Vol 43 (11) ◽  
pp. 2664-2676 ◽  
Author(s):  
Missy L. Teatero ◽  
Charles Netley
2014 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 491-500 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ingeborg Hauth ◽  
Yvette G. E. de Bruijn ◽  
Wouter Staal ◽  
Jan K. Buitelaar ◽  
Nanda N. Rommelse

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olivia Hendriks ◽  
Yimeng Wei ◽  
Varun Warrier ◽  
Gareth Richards

Previous research indicates a link between autism and gender variance, though the basis for this association is not fully understood. The current study examined autistic traits (as measured by the Autism Spectrum Quotient [AQ]) and empathizing and systemizing (as measured by the Empathizing Quotient-Short [EQ-S] and Systemizing Quotient-Short [SQ-S]) in a sample of n=89 UK adults representing a broad range of gender identities and sexual orientations. Compared with cisgender individuals (i.e. those who identify as the same gender as that assigned at birth), gender variant participants had significantly higher AQ and SQ-S scores, and stronger systemizing relative to empathizing (D-score). Further analysis revealed that there were significant differences between cisgender females and those assigned female at birth who do not identify as female (transgender AFAB), but not between cisgender males and those assigned male at birth who do not identify as male (transgender AMAB). These findings are broadly in line with the extreme male brain theory of autism, and may be relevant for developing effective support for gender variant and/or autistic individuals.


Science ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 310 (5749) ◽  
pp. 819-823 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Baron-Cohen ◽  
Rebecca C. Knickmeyer ◽  
Matthew K. Belmonte

Empathizing is the capacity to predict and to respond to the behavior of agents (usually people) by inferring their mental states and responding to these with an appropriate emotion. Systemizing is the capacity to predict and to respond to the behavior of nonagentive deterministic systems by analyzing input-operation-output relations and inferring the rules that govern such systems. At a population level, females are stronger empathizers and males are stronger systemizers. The “extreme male brain” theory posits that autism represents an extreme of the male pattern (impaired empathizing and enhanced systemizing). Here we suggest that specific aspects of autistic neuroanatomy may also be extremes of typical male neuroanatomy.


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Karson T. F. Kung

Abstract Background Prior research examining autistic traits in gender minority adults has reported mixed findings. Most prior studies did not include non-binary individuals. Little is known about the mechanisms shaping autistic traits in gender minority adults. This study examined autistic traits, as well as constructs related to the extreme male brain theory of autism and the mindblindness theory, in transgender and non-binary adults. Methods An online survey was conducted to assess autism-related traits in 323 gender minority adults, including 74 transgender men (individuals assigned female at birth and identify as a man), 95 transgender women (individuals assigned male at birth and identify as a woman), 104 non-binary AFAB (individuals assigned female at birth and identify as non-binary), and 50 non-binary AMAB (individuals assigned male at birth and identify as non-binary). Autistic traits, systemising, empathising, and Theory of Mind (ToM) were measured using the Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ), the short forms of the Systemising Quotient (SQ-Short) and the Empathy Quotient (EQ-Short), the 10-item version of the Empathy Quotient (EQ-10) and the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (Eyes Test). Participants’ scores on these measures were compared with previously published scores based on large-scale general population samples including thousands of participants. Results On average, compared with control females in the general population samples, both transgender men and non-binary AFAB scored significantly higher on the AQ and the SQ-Short but scored significantly lower on the EQ-Short, the EQ-10, and the Eyes Test. No clear or consistent group differences emerged when transgender women and non-binary AMAB were compared with control males. Limitations The present study does not have a large sample of gender minority adults. It has been argued that the measures employed may not provide a precise assessment of the psychological constructs of interest. The present study has a “non-clinical” sample. However, not all gender minorities have access to or require clinical services, and so a “non-clinical” sample may be more representative of the gender minority community as a whole than samples recruited through clinics. Conclusions The current findings suggest a “masculinised” autism-related profile and reduced ToM in transgender men and in non-binary AFAB. These findings might be interpreted to support the extreme male brain theory of autism and the mindblindness theory. Further research is needed to corroborate these findings.


2010 ◽  
Vol 35 (8) ◽  
pp. 1259-1264 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew J.O. Whitehouse ◽  
Murray T. Maybery ◽  
Roger Hart ◽  
Eugen Mattes ◽  
John P. Newnham ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
pp. 991-998
Author(s):  
Simon Baron-Cohen ◽  
Bonnie Auyeung ◽  
Emma Ashwin ◽  
Rebecca Knickmeyer ◽  
Michael Lombardo ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document