scholarly journals Birthweight in infants conceived through in vitro fertilization following blastocyst or cleavage-stage embryo transfer: a national registry study

2018 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 1027-1037 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia F. Litzky ◽  
Sheree L. Boulet ◽  
Navid Esfandiari ◽  
Yujia Zhang ◽  
Dmitry M. Kissin ◽  
...  
2001 ◽  
Vol 75 (4) ◽  
pp. S16-S17
Author(s):  
B.S. Shapiro ◽  
K.S. Richter ◽  
D.C. Harris ◽  
S.T. Daneshmand

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Murakami ◽  
K Tanaka ◽  
H Otsubo ◽  
S Mizumoto ◽  
Y Nagao ◽  
...  

Abstract Study question This report provides updated data from an RCT determining which embryo culture medium yields optimal IVF outcomes. Summary answer Embryo culture systems used for IVF differentially affected preimplantation development and resultant obstetric and perinatal outcomes, including birthweights of live-born singletons. What is known already Currently, multiple embryo culture medium systems are in use for IVF, raising questions regarding which is optimal. However, the ability of a medium to yield preimplantation embryos is not necessarily indicative of embryo viability. For example, supplementation of medium with serum was commonly used to increase animal blastocyst yields, but this impaired embryonic, fetal, and offspring health. In humans, medium composition and culture duration can influence IVF efficacy and offspring phenotype. Given the importance of culture systems in determining clinical outcomes, existing data regarding differential culture system impacts are insufficient and additional well-designed studies are required. Study design, size, duration Between February 2016 and August 2017, 795 couples undergoing their first autologous clinical IVF cycle and freeze-all strategy were recruited. Participants were randomized via computer-generated tables into three groups. Following standard oocyte retrieval and IVF/ICSI procedures, embryos were cultured using three different culture media, G1 Plus/G2 Plus (G1/G2; Vitrolife), Global Total (GT; LifeGlobal), or Sequential Cleav/Sequential Blast (SC/SB; Origio). Thirty-eight patients exhibiting no 2PN oocytes following insemination or those undergoing fresh embryo transfers were excluded. Participants/materials, setting, methods For patients yielding a single good-quality cleavage-stage (day–2 or day–3) embryo, that cleavage-stage embryo was vitrified. For patients yielding two or more good-quality cleavage-stage embryos, two or less good-quality cleavage-stage embryos were vitrified. The culture period of the remaining embryos was extended, and all good-quality blastocyst-stage (day–5 or day–6) embryos were vitrified. This report presents data for vitrified embryo transfer performed until the end of December 2020. Main results and the role of chance The mean per-cycle vitrified embryo yield (± SD) was comparable between groups for cleavage-stage embryos, but significantly different for blastocyst-stage embryos (G1/G2: 1.69 ± 2.2, GT: 2.53 ± 3.01, SC/SB: 2.04 ± 2.42; P = 0.001). Following vitrified cleavage- or blastocyst-stage embryo transfers, biochemical pregnancy rates were significantly different between groups (G1/G2: 55.6%, GT: 59.1%, SC/SB: 46.2%; P = 0.011). Furthermore, a between-group trend towards different live birth rates was observed (G1/G2: 41.7%, GT: 42.1%, SC/SB: 33.1%; P = 0.063). Of 382 live births, data for first-borns (n = 323; 295 singletons and 14 twin-pairs) are reported here. Perinatal data did not differ significantly between groups for both cleavage- and blastocyst-stage embryo transfers, including gestational age- and gender-adjusted singleton birthweight (z-score). Following multiple linear regression (including selected covariates), adjusted mean singleton birthweights were significantly lower in the G1/G2 and GT groups than in the SC/SB group (by 131 g; P = 0.011 and 110 g; P = 0.032, respectively) and tended to be lower for cleavage-stage embryo transfers than for blastocyst-stage embryo transfers (by 102 g; P = 0.053). Limitations, reasons for caution A larger cohort size and longer-term follow-up are required to verify and further elucidate the impact of embryo culture methods on child health. Such studies will raise awareness regarding the sensitivity of in vitro-cultured human embryos to their environment, ultimately resulting in practices that decrease IVF risks to offspring. Wider implications of the findings: Pregnancy outcome of the medium yielding fewer blastocysts was comparable or superior to that of other media, highlighting the importance of differentiating between the ability to support preimplantation development versus the ability to yield viable embryos. Embryo culture medium had a greater impact than embryo transfer stage on live birthweight. Trial registration number UMIN000020910


Author(s):  
Luis H. Sordia-Hernandez ◽  
Felipe A. Morales-Martinez ◽  
Lorna M. Frazer-Moreira ◽  
Lilith Villarreal-Pineda ◽  
María Ofelia Sordia-Piñeyro ◽  
...  

Objective: To determine if the elimination of fragments in cleavage-stage embryos, before fresh transfer, improves pregnancy rates in in vitro fertilization cycles. Materials and methods: This is a Prospective observational case-control study carried out at a University Reproductive Center. We included Twenty-six infertile patients divided into two groups. Group one: 13 patients with embryos classified as grade B and C (embryos with fragments) according to the Hill classification, and Group two: 13 patients with grade A embryos (embryos with no fragments). Embryo Defragmentation was performed in embryos of group one 65 to 68 hours after conventional fertilization. Fresh embryo transfer was made after two hours post fragments removal. Reproductive results were evaluated and compared between both groups. Results: The total number of clinical pregnancies was nine. In group one there were 5 (38.5 %); in group two, there were 4 (30.8%). The difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.68). Two abortions were reported in the study, both in group one; were fragment elimination was performed. This represents an abortion rate of 40% in patients who got pregnant in this group. These patients had twice the probability of suffering an abortion (OR 2.1; 95% CI 1.4-3.37). Ongoing pregnancies were similar in both groups. Conclusion: Removal of fragments in freshly transferred day three embryos could be an alternative to increase clinical pregnancy and ongoing pregnancy rates in patients who have only poor-quality embryos. Despite the relationship with a higher abortion rate, this strategy could represent a real alternative for this type of patient.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document