scholarly journals Bronze Age Globalisation and Eurasian Impacts on Later Jōmon Social Change

Author(s):  
Mark J. Hudson ◽  
Ilona R. Bausch ◽  
Martine Robbeets ◽  
Tao Li ◽  
J. Alyssa White ◽  
...  

AbstractFrom northern China, millet agriculture spread to Korea and the Maritime Russian Far East by 3500–2700 BC. While the expansion of agricultural societies across the Sea of Japan did not occur until around 900 BC, the intervening period saw major transformations in the Japanese archipelago. The cultural florescence of Middle Jōmon central Honshu underwent a collapse and reorganisation into more decentralised settlements. Mobility increased as Late Jōmon influences spread from eastern into western Japan, and populations expanded to offshore islands such as Okinawa and the Kurils. In Kyushu and other parts of western Japan, the eastern Jōmon expansion was associated with the cultivation of adzuki and soybeans but, contrary to earlier assessments, there is no evidence for the introduction of cereal crops at this time. Here, we analyse archaeological and historical linguistic evidence of connections between the Eurasian mainland and the Japanese Islands c. 3500 to 900 BC. A re-evaluation of archaeological material discussed since the 1920s concludes that the transformations in Jōmon society during this period were at least in part a response to contacts with Eurasian Bronze Age cultures. Evidence for linguistic contact between Koreanic and the Ainuic languages which are presumed to have been spoken by Jōmon populations is also consistent with new Bronze Age mobilities. Although prehistoric Japan was one of the most isolated regions of Eurasia, we conclude that the historical evolution of societies in the Japanese archipelago after the third millennium BC was linked with processes of Bronze Age globalisation.

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (7) ◽  
pp. 10-33
Author(s):  
Irina S. Zhushchikhovskaya ◽  
Lyudmila N. Mylnikova

Purpose. The article presents a historiographical review of the problems of research of ancient ceramics from archaeological sites of East Asia in the chronological interval from 20,000–18,000 to 9,000 years ago. Results. The subject of discussion is the periodization of monuments with early ceramics, the problems of socio-economic conditions of the emergence of pottery technology, its functional role in ancient societies, reconstruction of technological skills and technical levels of pottery, morphology and decor. There are a lot of controversial issues and “blind spots” in this direction. However, the opening of sites with ancient ceramics in East Asia showed that here, on the Pacific (eastern) outskirts of the Eurasian continent, pottery making technology first appeared about 10,000 years earlier than in the Middle East. The invention of ceramics in this region of the world at the turn of the Pleistocene and Holocene should be considered as a result of a combination of natural and social factors. The example of East Asia shows that the relationship between the appearance of ceramic vessels and the development of agriculture, as a technology for food production, is universally, not a mandatory factor. Conclusion. The article discusses certain regional differences in the formation of skills in making the most ancient ceramic vessels of East Asia. It is assumed that the development of ceramic technology in the Japanese archipelago and in the mainland areas of East Asia took place independently. For the Amur region, there are two local cultural traditions – Osipovskaya and Gromatukhinskaya. According to materials from Northern China, there is a version of the existence of a common line in the development of ancient ceramics in the Valley of the Nonny River. There are similarities between the early ceramics of Northeast China, and the Gromatukhinskaya and Osipovskaya cultures of Amur. For the ceramics of South Korea also note similarities with the materials of the Russian Far East, Japanese and Chinese dishes.


Author(s):  
Tao Li

Northeast Asia attracts researchers’ attention for its environmental, cultural, linguistic, and genetic diversity. Population migration and cultural contact both go back early in human history there. The Transeurasian (TEA) model hypothesizes about the relatedness among the Mongolic, Tungusic, Turkic, Koreanic, and Japonic languages; also, it sees farming as the driving force for the dispersal of the Proto-Transeurasian across Northeast Asia. This chapter reviews the finds of millets or rice from key archeological sites, as well as the perspectives on the beginning of millet or rice farming, in Northeast China, the Russian Far East, the Korean Peninsula, and the Japanese Archipelago. Then, focusing on evidence related to agriculture, some assumptions underlying the TEA model are examined. The conclusion is that the TEA model has both merits and weaknesses and that archeological evidence in different regions and periods supports the Transeurasian unity to varying degrees.


Author(s):  
Choongwon Jeong ◽  
Chuan-Chao Wang ◽  
Chao Ning

Contemporary Transeurasian-speaking populations reside in a wide geographic area encompassing the Eurasian steppe, Northeast China and the Russian Far East, as well as Korean peninsula and the Japanese archipelago. From population genetic studies of contemporary Transeurasian-speakers, it is well known that they are genetically heterogeneous, probably due to historical mixing with non-Transeurasian populations during their migration. Here, we provide an up-to-date overview of the genetic relationship among Transeurasian populations. Specifically, we focus on highlighting i) studies of contemporary populations explicitly taking into account the above stated recent admixture, and ii) paleogenomic studies of ancient genomes to directly recover prehistoric gene pools predating recent admixture events. These studies show an underlying shared genetic substratum among the Transeurasian populations, which is best represented by ancient populations from Northeast China and the Russian Far East, as well as present-day Tungusic-speaking populations.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saya Tamura ◽  
Myounghai Kwak ◽  
Goro Kokubugata ◽  
Chan-ho Park ◽  
Byoung-Yoon Lee ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTIn northeast Asia, substantial portion of the floras, including endangered species, are shared among its component countries in the continental, peninsula, and island parts largely through Quaternary migration. To effectively conserve nationally endangered plants in Northeast Asia, transnational conservation studies are vitally needed. Lychnis wilfordii (Caryophyllaceae) has disjunct distribution in Russian Far East (Primorsky Krai), northeast China (Jilin), Korea (Gangwon-do) and Japan (Hokkaido, Aomori, Nagano), surrounding the sea, and this is designated as an endangered species in Japan and Korea. Population genetic and molecular dating analyses were conducted 1) to elucidate geographic genetic structure covering the species range, 2) to test possible scenarios of migration, and 3) to develop logical plans for effective conservation. Population genetic analyses indicated the continent and peninsula parts (north and south Primorsky Krai, Jilin, and Gangwon-do) had higher genetic diversity compared to those in the Japanese Archipelago (Hokkaido and Nagano). Five genetically distinct groups were recognized, namely, Nagano, Gangwon-do, Jilin, north and south Primorsky Krai plus Aomori, and Hokkaido. Genetic distance between Hokkaido and Nagano was larger than between Hokkaido and north Primorsky Krai, and between Nagano and Gangwon-do, crossing national borders and the natural barrier of the sea. Considering these results, L. wilfordii likely migrated from the Asian continent to the Japanese Archipelago using two routes: north route from Russian Far East to Hokkaido and Aomori, and south route from the Korean Peninsula to Nagano. Based on molecular dating, migration from the continent to the islands likely occurred from the middle Pleistocene to the Holocene. For effective conservation of L. wilfordii, Hokkaido and Nagano populations should be distinguished as different evolutionary significant units, although these two regions belong to the same country, because Hokkaido and Nagano populations are at the different ends of the two migratory routes based on the migration scenario.


2007 ◽  
Vol 34 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Kaner ◽  
Takeshi Ishikawa

The concept of the Mesolithic/Neolithic transition is difficult to apply in the Japanese archipelago. The earliest pottery usage occurs in late Palaeolithic contexts. Holocene foragers lived in stable, permanent village settlements and constructed large scale monuments, and the first real ‘agriculture’ arrived as part of a cultural package which also included metallurgy. This paper will examine the use of the term ‘Neolithic’ in the history of Japanese archaeology, with particular emphasis on what happened in the western part of the archipelago in the latter part of the Jomon period (c. 5000 BC – c. 500 BC). Recent investigations in Kyushu and Western Honshu are leading to a re-assessment of the nature of Jomon culture and society in this region, traditionally considered to have ‘lagged behind’ the more developed societies of the eastern part of the archipelago, expressed in part through much lower population densities.


2021 ◽  
Vol 885 (1) ◽  
pp. 012027
Author(s):  
T M Komarova ◽  
I V Kalinina ◽  
D M Fetisov ◽  
S A Solovchenkov

Abstract Strengthening interaction in a cross-border area corresponds to the presence of linear infrastructure connecting border areas of neighbouring states. One of the projects, which has been implemented since 2008 in the Russian Far East to connect the Russian and Chinese parts of the Amur area (Priamurie), is the Nizhneleninskoye (Jewish Autonomous Oblast) – Tongjiang (Heilongjiang Province) railway bridge construction. The first combined data on the ongoing changes in the transport infrastructure, the potential trade and industrial development and interaction of border areas near the constructing railway bridge are presented in the paper. It was revealed that the key project result at present is the development of transport and logistics infrastructure that provides a connection between the industrial bases of the Northern China and the Russian Far East and Eastern Siberia. The possibilities of developing an industrial cluster in the bridge sites of the two countries are still being discussed.


1993 ◽  
Vol 62 (3) ◽  
pp. 179-191 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.-P. Henr ◽  
G. Magniez

Two species of anophthalmous, unpigmentedasellids have been found in springs and groundwaters of S.E. Siberia (Primorye region). Asellus (Asellus) primoryensis n. sp. is closelyrelated to the epigean species A. (A.) hilgendorfii Bovallius, 1886, as is the case for all stygobiont Asellus (Asellus) species previously known from the Japanese archipelago. Sibirasellus parpurae n. g., n. sp. is closely related to the microphthalmous species Asellus dentifer Birstein & Levanidov, 1952 from the Ussuri Basin (Khor region), now type-species of the new genus Sibirasellus. These two species show several original characters: body covered by numerous cuticular squamulae, mandibular palp reduced (glabrous and 2-segmented), and coxopodites of pereopods reduced and coalescent with their sternites, pointing to certain affinities with the stygobiont Japanese genus Nipponasellus Matsumoto, 1962 and probably to the epigean species of the “latifrons” group of the genus Asellus, presently restricted to arctic Siberia and western Alaska. The different asellid lines living in the Far East and Pacific North America are much more related with each other than with all other lines of the family.All these forms possess a copulatory system built on the “Asellus pattern”: Endopodite of 2nd male pleopod with a spur-shaped basal apophysis or “processus calcariformis”, an afferent spermaticopening with a labial spur or “processus cylindriformis”, and 2nd exopodite segment with a tergal or “catch lobe”. This phyletic system includes the genus Asellus Geoffroy, 1762 (the present status of which is discussed herein), its subgenera Asellus Dudich, 1925, Mesoasellus Birstein, 1951, and Phreatoasellus Matsumoto, 1962, and its related genera Calasellus Bowman, 1981, Nipponasellus Matsumoto, 1962, Uenasellus Matsumoto, 1962, and Sibirasellus n. g.


Phytotaxa ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 382 (1) ◽  
pp. 102 ◽  
Author(s):  
BOHUMIL MANDÁK ◽  
MARIA N. LOMONOSOVA ◽  
SERGEI L. MOSYAKIN

Chenopodium luteorubrum is described as a new species of Chenopodiaceae (Amaranthaceae sensu APG) from coastal habitats along the Sea of Japan in the Russian Far East. It has been demonstrated that this allohexaploid species (2n = 6x = 54) combines in its genome the subgenomes ‘A’ (closely related to or inherited from C. bryoniifolium), ‘C’ (unknown or extinct species), and ‘D’ (C. acuminatum s. l.). That subgenome combination is unique; it differs from the combination in C. album s. str. and closely related hexaploid taxa, which have ‘B’ (derived from C. ficifolium/C. suecicum), ‘C’, and ‘D’ subgenomes. Here we describe and illustrate the new species and provide information on its evolution, ecology, morphology, karyology, and distribution. The new species is compared with morphologically somewhat similar taxa C. album s. str. (hexaploid), C. suecicum (diploid), C. betaceum s. l. (C. strictum auct., tetraploid), and C. acuminatum (diploid).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document