scholarly journals Stochastic Local Interaction Model: An Alternative to Kriging for Massive Datasets

Author(s):  
Dionissios T. Hristopulos ◽  
Andrew Pavlides ◽  
Vasiliki D. Agou ◽  
Panagiota Gkafa
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dionissios Hristopulos ◽  
Vasiliki Agou ◽  
Andreas Pavlides ◽  
Panagiota Gkafa

<p>We present recent advances related to Stochastic Local Interaction (SLI) models. These probabilistic models capture local correlations by means of suitably constructed precision matrices which are inferred from the available data. SLI models share features with Gaussian Markov random fields, and they can be used to complete spatial and spatiotemporal datasets with missing data.  SLI models are applicable to data sampled on both regular and irregular space-time grids.  The SLI models can also incorporate space-time trend functions. The degree of localization provided by SLI models is determined by means of kernel functions and appropriate bandwidths that adaptively determine local neighborhoods around each point of interest (including points in the sampling set and the map grid). The local neighborhoods lead to sparse precision (inverse covariance) matrices and also to explicit, semi-analytical relations for predictions, which are based on the conditional mean and the conditional variance.</p><p>We focus on a simple SLI model whose parameter set involves amplitude and rigidity coefficients as well as a characteristic length scale. The SLI precision matrix is expressed explicitly in terms of the model parameter and the kernel function. The parameter estimation is based on the method of maximum likelihood estimation (MLE). However, covariance matrix inversion is not required, since the precision matrix is known conditionally on the model parameters. In addition, the calculation of the precision matrix determinant can be efficiently performed computationally given the sparsity of the precision matrix.  Typical values of the sparsity index obtained by analyzing various environmental datasets are less than 1%. </p><p>We discuss the results of SLI predictive performance with both real and simulated data sets. We find that in terms of cross validation measures the performance of the method is similar to ordinary kriging while the computations are faster.  Overall, the SLI model takes advantage of sparse precision matrix structure to reduce the computational memory and time required for the processing of large spatiotemporal datasets.  </p><p><strong> </strong></p><p><strong>References</strong></p><ol><li>D. T. Hristopulos. Stochastic local interaction (SLI) model: Bridging machine learning and geostatistics. Computers and Geosciences, 85(Part B):26–37, December 2015. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2015.05.018.</li> <li>D. T. Hristopulos and V. D. Agou. Stochastic local interaction model for space-time data. Spatial Statistics, page 100403, 2019. doi:10.1016/j.spasta.2019.100403.</li> <li>D. T. Hristopulos, A. Pavlides, V. D. Agou, P. Gkafa. Stochastic local interaction model for geostatistical analysis of big spatial datasets, 2019. arXiv:2001.02246</li> </ol>


2007 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 291-306 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandra Cassar ◽  
Rosella Nicolini

2010 ◽  
Vol 3 (5) ◽  
pp. 1687-1697 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Deng ◽  
Tongkui Yu ◽  
Honggang Li

2012 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 495-521
Author(s):  
Arnaud Canu ◽  
Abdel-Illah Mouaddib ◽  
François Poulet

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
J. Durieu ◽  
P. Solal

We study a local interaction model where agents play a finiten-person game following a perturbed best-response process with inertia. We consider the concept of minimalp-best response set to analyze distributions of actions on the long run. We distinguish between two assumptions made by agents about the matching rule. We show that only actions contained in the minimalp-best response set can be selected provided thatpis sufficiently small. We demonstrate that these predictions are sensitive to the assumptions about the matching rule.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document