Modal Logics of Stone Spaces

Order ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 271-292 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guram Bezhanishvili ◽  
John Harding
Keyword(s):  
2010 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 279-304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Serge P Odintsov ◽  
Heinrich Wansing
Keyword(s):  

1994 ◽  
Vol 27 (3-4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bronislaw Tembrowski
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 170 (5) ◽  
pp. 558-577
Author(s):  
Guram Bezhanishvili ◽  
Nick Bezhanishvili ◽  
Joel Lucero-Bryan ◽  
Jan van Mill

Studia Logica ◽  
1983 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. B. Shehtman
Keyword(s):  

2010 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alfredo Burrieza ◽  
Inmaculada P. de Guzmán ◽  
Emilio Muñoz-Velasco

2003 ◽  
Vol 290 (1) ◽  
pp. 599-635 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabio Alessi ◽  
Paolo Baldan ◽  
Furio Honsell
Keyword(s):  

1992 ◽  
Vol 16 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 231-262
Author(s):  
Philippe Balbiani

The beauty of modal logics and their interest lie in their ability to represent such different intensional concepts as knowledge, time, obligation, provability in arithmetic, … according to the properties satisfied by the accessibility relations of their Kripke models (transitivity, reflexivity, symmetry, well-foundedness, …). The purpose of this paper is to study the ability of modal logics to represent the concepts of provability and unprovability in logic programming. The use of modal logic to study the semantics of logic programming with negation is defended with the help of a modal completion formula. This formula is a modal translation of Clack’s formula. It gives soundness and completeness proofs for the negation as failure rule. It offers a formal characterization of unprovability in logic programs. It characterizes as well its stratified semantics.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document