scholarly journals Iterative numerical methods for sampling from high dimensional Gaussian distributions

2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 501-521 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erlend Aune ◽  
Jo Eidsvik ◽  
Yvo Pokern
Author(s):  
Andrew J. Connolly ◽  
Jacob T. VanderPlas ◽  
Alexander Gray ◽  
Andrew J. Connolly ◽  
Jacob T. VanderPlas ◽  
...  

With the dramatic increase in data available from a new generation of astronomical telescopes and instruments, many analyses must address the question of the complexity as well as size of the data set. This chapter deals with how we can learn which measurements, properties, or combinations thereof carry the most information within a data set. It describes techniques that are related to concepts discussed when describing Gaussian distributions, density estimation, and the concepts of information content. The chapter begins with an exploration of the problems posed by high-dimensional data. It then describes the data sets used in this chapter, and introduces perhaps the most important and widely used dimensionality reduction technique, principal component analysis (PCA). The remainder of the chapter discusses several alternative techniques which address some of the weaknesses of PCA.


2021 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. B30-B54
Author(s):  
J. G. López-Salas ◽  
S. Pérez-Rodríguez ◽  
C. Vázquez

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Björn Haffke ◽  
Riccardo Möller ◽  
Tobias Melz ◽  
Jens Strackeljan

This study deals with the external validation of simulation models using methods from differential algebra. Without any system identification or iterative numerical methods, this approach provides evidence that the equations of a model can represent measured and simulated sets of data. This is very useful to check if a model is, in general, suitable. In addition, the application of this approach to verification of the similarity between the identifiable parameters of two models with different sets of input and output measurements is demonstrated. We present a discussion on how the method can be used to find parameter deviations between any two models. The advantage of this method is its applicability to nonlinear systems as well as its algorithmic nature, which makes it easy to automate.


2020 ◽  
Vol 117 (17) ◽  
pp. 9183-9193
Author(s):  
Lars Ruthotto ◽  
Stanley J. Osher ◽  
Wuchen Li ◽  
Levon Nurbekyan ◽  
Samy Wu Fung

Mean field games (MFG) and mean field control (MFC) are critical classes of multiagent models for the efficient analysis of massive populations of interacting agents. Their areas of application span topics in economics, finance, game theory, industrial engineering, crowd motion, and more. In this paper, we provide a flexible machine learning framework for the numerical solution of potential MFG and MFC models. State-of-the-art numerical methods for solving such problems utilize spatial discretization that leads to a curse of dimensionality. We approximately solve high-dimensional problems by combining Lagrangian and Eulerian viewpoints and leveraging recent advances from machine learning. More precisely, we work with a Lagrangian formulation of the problem and enforce the underlying Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman (HJB) equation that is derived from the Eulerian formulation. Finally, a tailored neural network parameterization of the MFG/MFC solution helps us avoid any spatial discretization. Our numerical results include the approximate solution of 100-dimensional instances of optimal transport and crowd motion problems on a standard work station and a validation using a Eulerian solver in two dimensions. These results open the door to much-anticipated applications of MFG and MFC models that are beyond reach with existing numerical methods.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document