The subjective well-being of women in Europe: children, work and employment protection legislation

2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 219-245 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tatiana Karabchuk
2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 377-393 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chidiebere Ogbonnaya ◽  
Peter Gahan ◽  
Constanze Eib

The recession following the 2008 financial crisis brought major changes to employees’ experiences at work. We investigate the adverse effects of two of such changes: perceived organizational distress and job deterioration. We also examine the extent to which institutions at national level (employment protection legislation and collective bargaining coverage) and at workplace level (employment contract and union membership) may act as buffers against these effects. Using data from 21 European countries, we show that recessionary changes were associated with reduced psychological well-being and greater levels of work–nonwork interference.


2019 ◽  
Vol 72 (3) ◽  
pp. 893-914
Author(s):  
Christine Luecke ◽  
Andreas Knabe

Abstract Employment protection legislation (EPL) is an important determinant of workers’ perceived labour market prospects and also their subjective well-being. Recent studies indicate that it is not only a worker’s own level of protection that matters for individual prospects and well-being, but also that of others. We examine how such cross-effects on well-being are mediated by workers’ perceived risk of job loss and future employability. We apply a structural model to data from the European Quality of Life Survey and the OECD Employment Protection Database. Our results indicate that both permanent and fixed-term workers’ perceived employability is affected by EPL, positively for fixed-term workers and negatively for permanent workers. Stricter protection for permanent workers is positively related to fixed-term workers’ perceived risk of job loss. EPL has significant indirect (cross-)effects on life satisfaction via the mediators. There are no indications for direct, non-mediated effects.


Author(s):  
Samir Amine ◽  
Wilner Predelus

The merit of employment regulations in a market economy is often measured by their effectiveness in facilitating job creation without jeopardizing the notion of “decent work,” as defined by the International Labor Organization (ILO). Consequently, the recent literature on employment legislation has extensively focused on the flexibility of the labor market, as a fair middle ground is always necessary to avoid undue distortions that can negatively impact the economy and worker's wellbeing. This chapter analyzes the provisions of the labor law in Haiti and how it affects job security and flexibility to observe a flexible structure that rather benefits employers. Notably, labor law in Haiti may have in fact rendered workers more vulnerable because these labor legislations were enacted on the assumption that employers and workers are on the same footing when it comes to industrial relations, while historic facts do not support such an assumption.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document