scholarly journals High-Flexion Total Knee Replacement: Functional Outcome at One Year

2010 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 138-144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew S. Hepinstall ◽  
Amar S. Ranawat ◽  
Chitranjan S. Ranawat
2015 ◽  
Vol 97 (8) ◽  
pp. 563-567 ◽  
Author(s):  
JF Maempel ◽  
PJ Walmsley

Introduction Enhanced recovery programmes (ERPs) are being widely adopted in total knee replacement (TKR) procedures but studies confirming that they have no adverse effects on functional outcomes are lacking. The aim of this study was to compare length of stay, postoperative functional outcome and range of motion at one year postoperatively between patients undergoing TKR with an ERP and those with traditional rehabilitation. Methods A total of 165 consecutive patients undergoing primary unilateral TKR were included in the study. Overall, 84 patients undergoing TKR with an ERP were compared with a series of 81 patients undergoing primary unilateral TKR with traditional rehabilitation, immediately before the introduction of the ERP. Results The median postoperative length of stay was 3 days in the ERP cohort and 4 in the traditionally rehabilitated cohort (p<0.001). There were no significant differences in the preintervention characteristics of the groups and there was no significant difference in operative time, transfusion or rates of manipulation under anaesthesia. There was no difference in magnitude of improvement in American Knee Society score (p=0.12) or range of motion (p=0.81) between the groups. Conclusions ERP can reduce length of stay after TKR while offering improvements in knee function equivalent to those experienced by patients undergoing TKR with traditional rehabilitation. Furthermore, ERP can be implemented successfully in the setting of a district general hospital.


1997 ◽  
Vol 79 (4) ◽  
pp. 575-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
DAVID R. DIDUCH ◽  
JOHN N. INSALL ◽  
W. NORMAN SCOTT ◽  
GILES R. SCUDERI ◽  
DAVID FONT-RODRIGUEZ

2020 ◽  
pp. 221049172097184
Author(s):  
Madhan Jeyaraman ◽  
Dushyant Chaudhary

Introduction: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic, systemic, inflammatory disorder that involves symmetrical small and large joints. Despite DMARDs, biological agents and anti-inflammatory agents, severe damage to the joint cartilage occurs, mainly due to the growing synovium. Total knee replacement in RA has been an enormous boon to those who are suffering from pain and deformity because of severe restriction of knee joint movement. Objectives: To evaluate the clinical, functional and radiological outcomes after TKR for inflammatory arthropathy and to identify potential factors that affect the functional outcome after TKR for Rheumatoid Arthritis. Materials and Methods: Patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty for rheumatoid arthritis during the period 2011–2018 were recruited for the study after informed consent. The American Knee Society scores and functional scores were used for the functional outcome and assessment. Preoperative scores were obtained from previous medical records. Paired t test was done to determine the significance in changes between the preoperative and postoperative scores. Bivariate analysis using Spearman correlation and logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the influence of various factors on the postoperative knee scores. Results: The average age of patients at the time of TKR was 54 years, all were in stage IV disease, and the majority were women (n = 20). The significant improvement (p = 0.000) was observed between the preoperative (57.3) and postoperative (97.4) Knee Society scores, as well as improvement in functional scores from 36.3 preoperative to 85.2 points postoperatively after TKR. Steroid usage had a significant positive correlation. The duration of disease and involvement of the other joint had a significant negative correlation to postoperative functional scores. Conclusion: Total Knee Replacement has been proved as one of the most successful surgical interventions for reducing pain and enhancing physical function in inflammatory arthritis patients.


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 94-97 ◽  
Author(s):  
Krishnamoorthy Shriram ◽  
A.B. Govindaraj ◽  
A.N. Vivek ◽  
Sohanlal VijayKumar ◽  
M. Anand

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document