ISA-Hypoplasticity accounting for cyclic mobility effects for liquefaction analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 1513-1531 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Fuentes ◽  
Torsten Wichtmann ◽  
Melany Gil ◽  
Carlos Lascarro
2021 ◽  
Vol 144 ◽  
pp. 106707
Author(s):  
Zhehao Zhu ◽  
Feng Zhang ◽  
Qingyun Peng ◽  
Baptiste Chabot ◽  
Jean-Claude Dupla ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koichi Hashiguchi ◽  
Tatsuya Mase ◽  
Yuki Yamakawa

AbstractThe description of the cyclic mobility observed prior to the liquefaction in geomaterials requires the sophisticated constitutive formulation to describe the plastic deformation induced during the cyclic loading with the small stress amplitude inside the yield surface. This requirement is realized in the subloading surface model, in which the surface enclosing a purely elastic domain is not assumed, while a purely elastic domain is assumed in other elastoplasticity models. The subloading surface model has been applied widely to the monotonic/cyclic loading behaviors of metals, soils, rocks, concrete, etc., and the sufficient predictions have been attained to some extent. The subloading surface model will be elaborated so as to predict also the cyclic mobility accurately in this article. First, the rigorous translation rule of the similarity center of the normal yield and the subloading surfaces, i.e., elastic core, is formulated. Further, the mixed hardening rule in terms of volumetric and deviatoric plastic strain rates and the rotational hardening rule are formulated to describe the induced anisotropy of granular materials. In addition, the material functions for the elastic modulus, the yield function and the isotropic hardening/softening will be modified for the accurate description of the cyclic mobility. Then, the validity of the present formulation will be verified through comparisons with various test data of cyclic mobility.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 5283
Author(s):  
Jui-Ching Chou ◽  
Hsueh-Tusng Yang ◽  
Der-Guey Lin

Soil-liquefaction-related hazards can damage structures or lead to an extensive loss of life and property. Therefore, the stability and safety of structures against soil liquefaction are essential for evaluation in earthquake design. In practice, the simplified liquefaction analysis procedure associated with numerical simulation analysis is the most used approach for evaluating the behavior of structures or the effectiveness of mitigation plans. First, the occurrence of soil liquefaction is evaluated using the simplified procedure. If soil liquefaction occurs, the resulting structural damage or the following mitigation plan is evaluated using the numerical simulation analysis. Rational and comparable evaluation results between the simplified liquefaction analysis procedure and the numerical simulation analysis are achieved by ensuring that the liquefaction constitutive model used in the numerical simulation has a consistent liquefaction resistance with the simplified liquefaction analysis procedure. In this study, two frequently used liquefaction constitutive models (Finn model and UBCSAND model) were calibrated by fitting the liquefaction triggering curves of most used simplified liquefaction analysis procedures (NCEER, HBF, JRA96, and T-Y procedures) in Taiwan via FLAC program. In addition, the responses of two calibrated models were compared and discussed to provide guidelines for selecting an appropriate liquefaction constitutive model in future projects.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document