Preoperative Therapy and Pancreatoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: a 25-Year Single-Institution Experience

2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 164-174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jordan M. Cloyd ◽  
Matthew H. G. Katz ◽  
Laura Prakash ◽  
Gauri R. Varadhachary ◽  
Robert A. Wolff ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 31 ◽  
pp. S191
Author(s):  
A. Plaja Salarich ◽  
A. Ferrando Díez ◽  
A. Pous Badia ◽  
L. Notario Rincon ◽  
S. España Fernández ◽  
...  

Surgery Today ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryuichiro Kimura ◽  
Takao Ohtsuka ◽  
Makoto Kubo ◽  
Atsuko Kajihara ◽  
Atsushi Fujii ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 258-258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hannah Beal ◽  
Jill E. Shea ◽  
Benjamin Witt ◽  
Douglas G. Adler ◽  
Sean J. Mulvihill ◽  
...  

258 Background: Endoscopic ultrasound-directed fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in combination with imaging is currently the standard preoperative diagnostic method for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA). Previous studies have reported sensitivities and specificities ranging from 80%-90% and accuracies of approximately 85%. Our goal was to determine the accuracy of EUS-FNA for detecting PDA in individual patients at our institution. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review using the Clinical Cancer Research Database at Huntsman Cancer Institute (HCI). We included all cases in which pancreatic lesions were evaluated by EUS-FNA and a subsequent surgical resection was performed. All patients that met these criteria at HCI between March 1999 and April 2014 were included. Descriptive variables were calculated by comparing EUS-FNA results to final surgical diagnoses. The variables used to determine these values were; false positive = PDA by EUS-FNA and negative at resection, true positive = PDA for both, false negative = negative for PDA at EUS-FNA and positive at resection, true negative = negative for both. We considered atypical cells positive for PDA since their presence mandates aggressive intervention by the treating clinician. Results: Of the 242 patients that met the inclusion criterion, 139 were female with an average age of 58 +/- 15 (mean +/- standard deviation) and 103 were male with an average age of 62 +/- 13. In terms of diagnosing PDA by EUS-FNA we determined the sensitivity 89% (81%-94%; 95% confidence interval), specificity 76% (68%-83%), positive predictive value of 74% (66%-82%), and negative predictive value 89% (82%-94%). Conclusions: Although our findings are relatively consistent with the current literature, there is discernible potential for inappropriate treatment of patients based purely on EUS-FNA evaluation. Limitations of this study are the appraisal at a single institution and the necessity to evaluate only cases that ultimately had surgical resection of the pancreatic lesion.


2017 ◽  
Vol 152 (5) ◽  
pp. S1237-S1238
Author(s):  
Jordan M. Cloyd ◽  
Laura R. Prakash ◽  
Graciela M. Nogueras-González ◽  
Maria Petzel ◽  
Nathan Parker ◽  
...  

JAMA Surgery ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 152 (11) ◽  
pp. 1048 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jordan M. Cloyd ◽  
Huamin Wang ◽  
Michael E. Egger ◽  
Ching-Wei D. Tzeng ◽  
Laura R. Prakash ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document