scholarly journals Academic–Industry Research Partnerships: an Emerging Opportunity or Just Smoke and Mirrors?

2015 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 149-150
Author(s):  
Michael Hochman ◽  
Rachael Bedard
2018 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. 1236-1255 ◽  
Author(s):  
Esther de Wit-de Vries ◽  
Wilfred A. Dolfsma ◽  
Henny J. van der Windt ◽  
M. P. Gerkema

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 103-108
Author(s):  
Grace Leone

Urban Animators: Living Laboratory (UA:LL) was a public art research project that actively engaged with the RMIT University  New Academic Street capital works project, undertaken at the Melbourne city campus from 2015-2017. The construction site and the surrounding campus were envisaged as a living laboratory encouraging research that engaged with the internal infrastructure, process and community of RMIT University.As curator of the UA:LL public art program I created a framework that encouraged collaboration, provocation, solidarity and exchange amongst RMIT University students, staff and alumni.  This was achieved through the process of open expression of interests, learning and teaching, invited artists and industry research partnerships all resulting in public artworks embedded in the construction zone. The artistic installations included public artworks on construction hoardings and projections within the constriction zone that positively activated the site condition and helped mitigate the disruption occurring on the campus.As a curator, artist and designer I proposed a spatial curatorial proposition to the city via a public art installation titled ‘Gantry Section D’ as part of the UA:LL program. ‘Gantry Section D’ was the result of an intensive period of practice based investigation into the condition created when a city is undergoing transformation.


2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 393-416 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kasia Zalewska-Kurek ◽  
Rainer Harms

Abstract Research partnerships between university researchers and industry partners are becoming increasingly prevalent. For university researchers, maintaining autonomy is crucial. We explore how researchers strategically manage autonomy in collaborative research partnerships, using a framework to distinguish strategically planned and opportunity-driven behaviour in the process of selecting partners and executing research in partnerships. We then focus on the management of autonomy in setting research directions and managing the research process. We draw on insights from 14 management scholars engaged in collaborative Ph.D. research projects. Based on our analysis, we show that researcher autonomy has two facets: operational and scientific. Researchers are willing to compromise their operational autonomy as a price for industry collaboration. They have a strong need for scientific autonomy when deciding on research direction and research execution. Although they need funding, entering a specific relationship with industry and accepting restrictions on their operational autonomy is a choice. We conclude that researchers’ orientations towards practice and theory affects their choices in partnerships as well as modes of governance.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sapfo Lignou ◽  
John Geddes ◽  
Ilina Singh

Advancements in mental health research, social changes and policy developments have led to the emergence of new forms of research partnerships, which bring together research institutions, public companies and lay people as partners in the same research project. In this paper, we argue that partnerships comprised of industry, academia and people with experience of mental illness may present practical and ethical challenges that affect the conduct of research and undermine public trust in research collaborations. We outline a number of ethical problems from the motivation to combine competing interests and values of these diverse research partners. We argue that while critical perspectives on each of the partnership forms outlined above exist in the literature, the combination of industry, research and PPI actors in partnership in mental health research has not received sufficient scrutiny. We suggest that a robust ethical approach is needed to properly substantiate the value of such research partnerships, to inform practical and ethical guidance on potential conflicts and to facilitate productive collaborative research.


2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 227-235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca A. Dore ◽  
Marcia Shirilla ◽  
Brian N. Verdine ◽  
Laura Zimmermann ◽  
Roberta Michnick Golinkoff ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document