scholarly journals Peer Support for Self-Management of Chronic Pain: the Evaluation of a Peer Coach-Led Intervention to Improve Pain Symptoms (ECLIPSE) Trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (12) ◽  
pp. 3525-3533
Author(s):  
Marianne S. Matthias ◽  
Matthew J. Bair ◽  
Susan Ofner ◽  
Michele Heisler ◽  
Marina Kukla ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Joyce S. Mannon, B.S. ◽  
Marianne S. Matthias, Ph.D.

Background: ECLIPSE (Evaluation of a Peer Coach-Led Intervention to Improve Pain Symptoms) is a randomized controlled trial testing peer-supported chronic pain self-management. Veterans are paired with a peer coach (also with chronic pain) for 6 months. Peer coaches (PCs) and veterans meet or talk by phone 2x/month about pain self-management strategies, and veterans receive motivation and encouragement from their PC. To determine if the intervention was delivered as intended, fidelity was assessed at the end of the intervention period. Fidelity assessment is vital to help understand reasons for an intervention’s success or failure.   Methods: Intervention veterans were asked about the intervention’s delivery during their 6-month assessment, after intervention completion. Presence or absence of four “essential elements” of the intervention were evaluated, as well as meeting frequency.    Results: Scoring of veteran assessments revealed 74% of PC’s discussed self-management strategies and 69% of veterans felt motivated by their PC. Only 52% discussed how to adjust strategies and 34% discussed goal-setting. PC-veteran meeting frequency varied: 16% met weekly, 21% met twice a month, 16% met once a month, and 46% met less than once a month. 47% of PC’s had greater than 75% fidelity (i.e., the presence of at least 3 of 4 elements described above).   Conclusion and Potential Impact: About half of PC’s delivered the intervention with at least 75% fidelity. Fidelity was greater for discussing self-management strategies and motivating veterans. Results suggest that peer-supported self-management can be delivered with fidelity but PCs may need additional training to do so consistently.


Pain Medicine ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (S1) ◽  
pp. S76-S85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Courtney Lee ◽  
Cindy Crawford ◽  
Steven Swann ◽  

Pain Medicine ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (7) ◽  
pp. 1311-1320
Author(s):  
Sarah A Shue ◽  
Alan B McGuire ◽  
Marianne S Matthias

Abstract Objective Pain self-management information and support, delivered by peers, are a potentially useful approach to help patients who are struggling to manage their chronic pain. Before implementation into clinical settings, it is important to understand factors that may influence the success of implementation. The purpose of this study was to explore facilitators and barriers to implementation of peer support for chronic pain. Design Semistructured interviews were conducted with clinicians who provide care to patients with chronic pain, regarding their perceptions of the proposed peer support intervention. Setting A single US Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Subjects Using maximum variation sampling, 15 providers were interviewed (11 women, four men). Clinicians’ disciplines included primary care, physical therapy, nursing, clinical psychology, social work, and pharmacy. Results Findings indicated that clinicians 1) had an overall positive perception of the intervention; 2) had specific intervention outcomes they wanted for patients; 3) anticipated that the intervention could positively influence their role; 4) anticipated barriers to intervention participation and maintenance; and 5) had concerns regarding peer coach selection. Findings are discussed in the context of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Conclusions Understanding clinician perceptions of a peer support intervention is critical for successful implementation. The feedback collected in this study will facilitate implementation of the intervention on a broader scale, allowing more patients to benefit.


2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. S105
Author(s):  
M. Matthias ◽  
M. Kukla ◽  
A. McGuire ◽  
M. Bair

Pain Medicine ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (S1) ◽  
pp. S21-S39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Courtney Lee ◽  
Cindy Crawford ◽  
Anita Hickey ◽  

Pain Medicine ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (S1) ◽  
pp. S40-S53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Courtney Lee ◽  
Cindy Crawford ◽  
Eric Schoomaker ◽  

Pain Medicine ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (S1) ◽  
pp. S54-S65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cindy Crawford ◽  
Courtney Lee ◽  
Todd May ◽  

Pain Medicine ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (S1) ◽  
pp. S66-S75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cindy Crawford ◽  
Courtney Lee ◽  
John Bingham ◽  

Pain Medicine ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesca M Nicosia ◽  
Carolyn J Gibson ◽  
Natalie Purcell ◽  
Kara Zamora ◽  
Jennifer Tighe ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives Biopsychosocial, integrated pain care models are increasingly implemented in the Veterans Health Administration to improve chronic pain care and reduce opioid-related risks, but little is known about how well these models address women veterans’ needs. Design Qualitative, interview-based study. Setting San Francisco VA Health Care System Integrated Pain Team (IPT), an interdisciplinary team that provides short-term, personalized chronic pain care emphasizing functional goals and active self-management. Subjects Women with chronic pain who completed ≥3 IPT sessions. Methods Semistructured phone interviews focused on overall experience with IPT, perceived effectiveness of IPT care, pain care preferences, and suggested changes for improving gender-sensitive pain care. We used a rapid approach to qualitative thematic analysis to analyze interviews. Results Fourteen women veterans (mean age 51 years; range 33–67 years) completed interviews. Interviews revealed several factors impacting women veterans’ experiences: 1) an overall preference for receiving both primary and IPT care in gender-specific settings, 2) varying levels of confidence that IPT could adequately address gender-specific pain issues, 3) barriers to participating in pain groups, and 4) barriers to IPT self-management recommendations due to caregiving responsibilities. Conclusions Women veterans reported varied experiences with IPT. Recommendations to improve gender-sensitive pain care include increased provider training; increased knowledge of and sensitivity to women’s health concerns; and improved accommodations for prior trauma, family and work obligations, and geographic barriers. To better meet the needs of women veterans with chronic pain, integrated pain care models must be informed by an understanding of gender-specific needs, challenges, and preferences.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document