scholarly journals Multimodal, Integrative Therapies for the Self-Management of Chronic Pain Symptoms

Pain Medicine ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (S1) ◽  
pp. S76-S85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Courtney Lee ◽  
Cindy Crawford ◽  
Steven Swann ◽  
Pain Medicine ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (S1) ◽  
pp. S21-S39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Courtney Lee ◽  
Cindy Crawford ◽  
Anita Hickey ◽  

Pain Medicine ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (S1) ◽  
pp. S40-S53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Courtney Lee ◽  
Cindy Crawford ◽  
Eric Schoomaker ◽  

Pain Medicine ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (S1) ◽  
pp. S54-S65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cindy Crawford ◽  
Courtney Lee ◽  
Todd May ◽  

Pain Medicine ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (S1) ◽  
pp. S66-S75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cindy Crawford ◽  
Courtney Lee ◽  
John Bingham ◽  

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Joyce S. Mannon, B.S. ◽  
Marianne S. Matthias, Ph.D.

Background: ECLIPSE (Evaluation of a Peer Coach-Led Intervention to Improve Pain Symptoms) is a randomized controlled trial testing peer-supported chronic pain self-management. Veterans are paired with a peer coach (also with chronic pain) for 6 months. Peer coaches (PCs) and veterans meet or talk by phone 2x/month about pain self-management strategies, and veterans receive motivation and encouragement from their PC. To determine if the intervention was delivered as intended, fidelity was assessed at the end of the intervention period. Fidelity assessment is vital to help understand reasons for an intervention’s success or failure.   Methods: Intervention veterans were asked about the intervention’s delivery during their 6-month assessment, after intervention completion. Presence or absence of four “essential elements” of the intervention were evaluated, as well as meeting frequency.    Results: Scoring of veteran assessments revealed 74% of PC’s discussed self-management strategies and 69% of veterans felt motivated by their PC. Only 52% discussed how to adjust strategies and 34% discussed goal-setting. PC-veteran meeting frequency varied: 16% met weekly, 21% met twice a month, 16% met once a month, and 46% met less than once a month. 47% of PC’s had greater than 75% fidelity (i.e., the presence of at least 3 of 4 elements described above).   Conclusion and Potential Impact: About half of PC’s delivered the intervention with at least 75% fidelity. Fidelity was greater for discussing self-management strategies and motivating veterans. Results suggest that peer-supported self-management can be delivered with fidelity but PCs may need additional training to do so consistently.


2012 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 157-168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clair Barefoot ◽  
Thomas Hadjistavropoulos ◽  
R. Nicholas Carleton ◽  
James Henry

Chronic pain is often resistant to traditional medical management and other types of professional intervention. As such, several investigators have conducted studies of pain self-management programs. These self-management programs, however, were often led by therapists and shared much in common with traditional cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT); the efficacy of which, despite some inconsistencies, is largely supported in the literature. Although, like CBT, many therapist led programs involve a component of self-management in the form of “homework assignments,” it is important to evaluate the effectiveness of pain self-management, which is not therapist led. Within the context of controlled investigation, we evaluated a pain self-management program that involved use of a comprehensive self-help pain management book for older adults. Contrary to expectation, we did not identify any differences in the outcomes observed in the self-help patient group as compared to the control group (i.e., participants who did not receive the pain management book until after the study was completed) despite a great deal of satisfaction with the manualized program that was expressed by the participants. The implications of these findings are discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document