Comparative study of perioperative and survival outcomes after video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (VEIL) and open inguinal lymph node dissection (O-ILND) in the management of inguinal lymph nodes in carcinoma of the penis

Author(s):  
Yuvaraja B. Thyavihally ◽  
Preetham Dev ◽  
Santosh S. Waigankar ◽  
Abhinav Pednekar ◽  
Bijal Kulkarni ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. 2501
Author(s):  
Reza Nabavizadeh ◽  
Benjamin Petrinec ◽  
Andrea Necchi ◽  
Igor Tsaur ◽  
Maarten Albersen ◽  
...  

Our aim is to review the benefits as well as techniques, surgical outcomes, and complications of minimally invasive inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND) for penile cancer. The PubMed, Wiley Online Library, and Science Direct databases were reviewed in March 2020 for relevant studies limited to those published in English and within 2000–2020. Thirty-one articles describing minimally invasive ILND were identified for review. ILND has an important role in both staging and treatment of penile cancer. Minimally invasive technologies have been utilized to perform ILND in penile cancer patients with non-palpable inguinal lymph nodes and intermediate to high-risk primary tumors or patients with unilateral palpable non-fixed inguinal lymph nodes measuring less than 4 cm, including videoscopic endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (VEIL) and robotic videoscopic endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (RVEIL). Current data suggest that VEIL and RVEIL are feasible and safe with minimal intra-operative complications. Perhaps the strongest appeal for the use of minimally-invasive approaches is their faster post-operative recovery and less post-operative complications. As a result, patients can tolerate this procedure better and surgeons can offer surgery to patients who otherwise would not be a candidate or personally willing to undergo surgery. When compared to open technique, VEIL and RVEIL have similar dissected nodal count, a surrogate metric for oncological adequacy, and a none-inferior inguinal recurrence rate. Larger randomized studies are encouraged to investigate long-term outcome and survival rates using these minimally-invasive techniques for ILND.


2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 159-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vandana Jain ◽  
Rupinder Sekhon ◽  
Shveta Giri ◽  
Nahida Hassan ◽  
Kanika Batra ◽  
...  

ObjectivesTo describe the technique of robotic-assisted video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (R-VEIL) in patients with carcinoma vulva and discuss the advantages of the technique and oncological outcome.MethodsTwelve patients of squamous cell cancer of vulva underwent 22 R-VEIL procedures from February 2011 to February 2015. Their preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data were retrospectively analysed.ResultsThe mean age of patients was 61 years (range, 32–78 years). The mean operative time was 69.3 minutes (range, 45–95 minutes). The mean blood loss was 30 mL (range, 15–50 mL). No intraoperative complication was observed. The mean drain output was 119 mL (range, 50–250 mL), and the drains were removed at a mean of 13.9 days (range, 8–38 days). The average number of superficial and deep inguinofemoral lymph nodes retrieved was 11 (range, 4–26). Two patients had positive lymph nodes on histopathology (16.67%). Postoperative complications were lymphocele (6 groins), chronic lower limb lymphedema (6 cases), prolonged lymphorrhea (1 groin), and cellulitis (2 groins). Over a follow-up period ranging from 7 to 67 months, 1 patient developed recurrence in the inguinal nodes and died 7 months after the recurrence.ConclusionsThe R-VEIL allows the removal of inguinal lymph nodes within the same limits as the open procedure for inguinal lymph node dissection and has a potential to reduce the surgical morbidity associated with the open procedure. Long-term oncological results are not available though our initial results appear promising. Prospective multi-institutional studies are required to prove its efficacy over open inguinal lymph node dissection.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. MMT42
Author(s):  
Enrique Boldo ◽  
Araceli Mayol ◽  
Rafael Lozoya ◽  
Alba Coret ◽  
Diana Escribano ◽  
...  

Aim: Morbidity of open inguinal lymphadenectomy (OIL) is high. We use laparoscopy for pelvic time, preservation of the greater saphenous vein and transverse inguinal incisions (laparoscopically assisted ilio-inguinal lymphadenectomy, LIIL) to improve postoperative outcomes. Patients & methods: Retrospective comparison of 14 patients who underwent LIIL and seven patients who underwent OIL. Results: Fourteen LIIL compared with seven OIL showed a statistically significant reduction in morbidity (15.3 vs 75%) and hospital stay (7 vs 15.7 days). Pelvic lymph node involvement (27%) was not detected preoperatively. With a mean follow-up of 36.2 (range: 3–137) months, local recurrence rate was 58.3% in LIIL and 40% in OIL. Overall survival was significantly higher in OIL than in LIIL. Conclusion: Compared with OIL, LIIL reduced postoperative complications and hospital stay.


2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammed Beşir Öztürk ◽  
Arzu Akan ◽  
Özay Özkaya ◽  
Onur Egemen ◽  
Ali Rıza Öreroğlu ◽  
...  

Aim. The classic inguinal lymph node dissection is the main step for the regional control of the lower extremity melanoma, but this surgical procedure is associated with significant postoperative morbidity. The permanent lymphedema is the most devastating long-term complication leading to a significant decrease in the patient’s quality of life. In this study we present our experience with modified, saphenous vein sparing, inguinal lymph node dissections for patients with melanoma of the lower extremity.Methods. Twenty one patients (10 women, 11 men) who underwent saphenous vein sparing superficial inguinal lymph node dissection for the melanoma of lower extremity were included in this study. The effects of saphenous vein sparing on postoperative complications were evaluated.Results. We have observed the decreased rate of long-term lymphedema in patients undergoing inguinal lymphadenectomy for the lower extremity melanoma.Conclusion. The inguinal lymphadenectomy with saphenous vein preservation in lower extremity melanoma patients seems to be an oncologically safe procedure and it may offer reduced long-term morbidity.


2013 ◽  
Vol 40 (9) ◽  
pp. 765-766
Author(s):  
Tomoko Kobayashi ◽  
Kenji Yokota ◽  
Masaki Sawada ◽  
Takaaki Matsumoto ◽  
Masashi Akiyama

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document