Elevation of the d-dimer cut-off level might be applicable to rule out pulmonary embolism for active cancer patients in the emergency department

Author(s):  
Hyojeong Kwon ◽  
Youn-Jung Kim ◽  
Eun-Ju Her ◽  
Bora Chae ◽  
Yoon-Seon Lee
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
BV Silva ◽  
C Mendonca ◽  
N Cunha ◽  
P Silverio Antonio ◽  
T Rodrigues ◽  
...  

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background Pulmonary embolism (PE) is more prevalent in patients with cancer. D-dimers are a less useful test in such patients due to less specificity. Several algorithms have been developed as an alternative to the fixed d-dimer cutoff,  aiming to avoid the excessive use of computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA), but it is not clear which is the most accurate algorithm in PE patients with cancer. Objective To compare the efficacy of 4 algorithms to rule out pulmonary embolism (fixed Ddimer cutoff, age-adjusted, YEARS and PEGed) in patients with active cancer. Methods Retrospective study of consecutive outpatients who presented to the emergency department and underwent CTPA for PE suspicion from April 2019 to February 2020. The clinical-decision algorithms were retrospectively applied. In fixed and age-adjusted cutoffs, high probability patients are directly selected for CTPA and the others perform CTPA if DDimer ≥500µg/L or age x10 µg/L within patients over 50 years, respectively. YEARS includes 3 items (signs of deep vein thrombosis, haemoptysis and whether PE is the most likely diagnosis): patients without any YEARS items and Ddimer ≥1000ng/mL or with ≥1 items and Ddimer 500ng/mL perform CTPA. In the PEGeD, patients with high clinical probability or with intermediate and Ddimer >500µg/L or low probability and Ddimer >1000 µg/L are selected for CTPA. Results Of 409 patients with suspected PE, 87 patients (21,3%) had cancer. The prevalence of PE was 38% in cancer patients and 35% in patients without cancer (p > 0.05). Age-adjusted cut-off, compared to the conventional cutoff, had an AUC significantly higher (0.68 vs 0.61, p = 0.005). Despite both having 100% sensitivity, age-adjusted cutoff had a significant higher specificity compared to conventional cut-off (44% vs 35%, p < 0.05). Both YEARS and PEGED algorithms had significantly lower sensitivity (p = 0.003 and p = 0.002, respectively) and higher specificity (p < 0.001, for both) compared to conventional cutoff in patients with active cancer. The AUC of these two algorithms was not significantly different compared to conventional cutoff (p = 0.08 and p = 0.78, respectively). Conclusion Considering our results, age-adjusted cut-off seems to be the most accurate algorithm to rule out pulmonary embolism in active cancer patients. Sen(%)Spec(%)Conventional10022Age-adjusted10035YEARS9144PEGED9130Abstract Figure. AUC of four algorithms


CJEM ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (S1) ◽  
pp. S93-S94
Author(s):  
S. Sharif ◽  
C. Kearon ◽  
M. Eventov ◽  
M. Li ◽  
P. Sneath ◽  
...  

Introduction: Diagnosing pulmonary embolism (PE) can be challenging because the signs and symptoms are often non-specific. Studies have shown that evidence-based algorithms are not always adhered to in the Emergency Department (ED), which leads to unnecessary CT scanning. The pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria (PERC) can identify patients who can be safely discharged from the ED without further investigation for PE. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the use of the PERC rule in the ED and to compare the rates of testing for PE if the PERC rule was used. Methods: This was a health records review of ED patients investigated for PE at two emergency departments over a two-year period (April 2013-March 2015). Inclusion criteria were ED physician ordered CT pulmonary angiogram, ventilation-perfusion scan, or D-dimer for investigation of PE. Patients under the age of 18 were excluded. PE was considered to be present during the emergency department visit if PE was diagnosed on CT or VQ (subsegmental level or above), or if the patient was subsequently found to have PE or deep vein thrombosis during the next 30 days. Trained researchers extracted anonymized data. The rate of CT/VQ imaging and the negative predictive value was calculated. Results: There were 1,163 patients that were tested for PE and 1,097 patients were eligible for our analysis. Of the total, 330/1,097 (30.1%; 95%CI 27.4-32.3%) had CT/VQ imaging for PE, and 48/1,097 (4.4%; 95%CI 3.3-5.8%) patients were diagnosed with PE. 806/1,097 (73.5%; 95%CI 70.8-76.0%) were PERC positive, and of these, 44 patients had a PE (5.5%; 95%CI 4.1-7.3%). Conversely, 291/1,097 (26.5%; 95%CI 24.0-29.2%) patients were PERC negative, and of these, 4 patients had a PE (1.4%; 95%CI 0.5-3.5%). Of the PERC negative patients, 291/291 (100.0%; 95%CI 98.7-100.0%) had a D-dimer test done, and 33/291 (11.3%; 95%CI 8.2-15.5%) had a CT angiogram. If PERC was used, CT/VQ imaging would have been avoided in 33/1,097 (3%; 95%CI 2.2-4.2%) patients and the D-dimer would have been avoided in 291/1,097 (26.5%; 95%CI 24.0-29.2%) patients. Conclusion: If the PERC rule was used in all patients with suspected PE, fewer patients would have further testing. The false negative rate for the PERC rule was low.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 3406-3406
Author(s):  
Suman L. Sood ◽  
Cathy Stabler ◽  
Mariam Khan ◽  
Angela E. Hawley ◽  
Kenneth E. Guire ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 3406 Background: Accurate and early diagnosis of DVT is crucial to prevent untreated DVT from progressing to fatal PE. Clinical scoring systems used in combination with D-dimer for DVT diagnosis can exclude but not confirm DVT, and vascular ultrasound is still needed. Diagnostic algorithms are challenging in cancer, where the burden of VTE is higher, clinical scores less accurate and baseline D-dimer frequently elevated. Soluble P-selectin (sPsel) is expressed upon activation of platelets and endothelial cells by a thrombotic stimulus. sPsel is known to be important in predicting VTE in cancer patients. We previously showed that elevated sPsel in combination with Wells' score can confirm lower extremity (LE) DVT with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 100% in a general patient cohort (Clin Appl Thromb Hemost, 2011; 17:425–31). To date, no validated biomarker can establish VTE in cancer patients. The primary objective of this analysis was to identify a biomarker that alone or in combination confirms the presence of acute DVT in cancer patients. Secondary objective was to apply the previously derived model to patients with active cancer. Methods: Patients referred to the diagnostic vascular ultrasound lab with signs or symptoms concerning for acute LE DVT were enrolled in a prospective cohort study. Following informed consent, patients underwent LE doppler, clinical assessment, and blood draw for biomarkers sPsel, D-dimer, and CRP. Exclusion criteria were age < 18, isolated calf vein DVT, pregnant, nursing, or on therapeutic anticoagulation. Only subjects with active cancer, defined as actively receiving anti-tumor therapy, or with physical or radiological evidence of malignancy within 6 months of enrollment, were included in this subset analysis of previously published data. Continuous and categorical values were compared with t-test and chi-squared test, respectively. PPV and NPV were estimated from cut points. Results: Between 2006 to 2012, 442 patients with LE DVT were eligible for analysis; 99 had active cancer. 60 cases (63% male) had a confirmed proximal LE DVT; 39 controls (56% male) had leg pain but negative for VTE. Cases had increased prior history (p=0.001) and family history of VTE (p=0.039). No difference in mean age (62.4 vs. 61.8 years), BMI, or active chemotherapy was seen. Cancer types (%) included: breast (4), lung (10), hematologic (22), melanoma (3), GI (16), GU (16), Gyn (11), brain (4), other (6). sPsel, D-dimer, CRP, and Wells' score were all elevated in cases versus controls at time of DVT diagnosis. Application of our previously derived model of sPsel + Wells' with cut point of 2 yielded a similar PPV but lower NPV in active cancer versus non-cancer patients. Had imaging not been available, we could have ruled in or out 27.5% (27/98) patients for LE-DVT with this rule. D-dimer + Wells' had a superior NPV, albeit in a low number of patients. Raising the Wells' cut point to 3 (to accommodate a point assigned in the score for active cancer) improved the PPV for both the sPsel and D-dimer models, at the expense of the NPV in the D-dimer model. 38% (37/98) cancer patients could be ruled in or out for LE-DVT without imaging in this sPsel model. Conclusions: D-dimer is the most commonly used marker to rule out acute DVT. However, due to its low specificity and elevated baseline value in patients with cancer, it cannot be used to confirm clot presence. In patients with active cancer presenting with potential symptoms of LE DVT, sPsel, D-dimer, CRP and Wells' criteria were all elevated in cases versus controls. A combination of sPsel ≥ 90 ng/mL + Wells' ≥ 3 was superior to the D-dimer + Wells score to rule in clot at the time of presentation. D-dimer remained superior to rule out clot in this population. In the future, rapid VTE diagnosis through the use of novel biomarkers such as sPsel may help improve morbidity and mortality. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2006 ◽  
Vol 95 (04) ◽  
pp. 715-719 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grégoire Le Gal ◽  
Sylvain De Lucia ◽  
Pierre-Marie Roy ◽  
Guy Meyer ◽  
Drahomir Aujesky ◽  
...  

SummaryLimited data are available about the diagnostic value of D-dimer testing in cancer patients with clinically suspected pulmonary embolism (PE).Therefore, we evaluated i) the safety and clinical usefulness of an ELISA D-dimer test to rule out PE in cancer patients compared with non-cancer patients and ii) whether adopting a higher D-dimer cut-off value might increase the usefulness of D-dimer in cancer patients. We analysed data from two outcome studies which enrolled 1,721 consecutive patients presenting in the emergency department with clinically suspected PE. Presence of an active malignancy was abstracted from the database. All patients underwent a sequential diagnostic work-up including an ELISA D-dimer test and a 3-month followup. Sensitivity and predictive value (NPV) were 100% in both cancer and non-cancer patients. PE was ruled out by a negative D-dimer test in 494/1,554 (32%) patients without cancer, and in 18/164 (11%) patients witha malignancy. At cut-off values varying from 500 to 900 µg/l, the sensitivity was unchanged (100%, 95% CI: 93% to 100%) and the specificity increased from 16% (95% CI:11% to 24%) to 30% (95% CI:22% to 39%).The 3-month thromboembolic risk was 0% (95 % CI: 0% to 18%) in cancer patients witha negative D-dimer test. ELISA D-dimer appears safe to rule out pulmonary embolism in cancer patients but it is negative in only one of ten patients at the usual cut-off value. Increasing the cut-off value of D-dimer in cancer patients might increase the test’s clinical usefulness.


2008 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 11
Author(s):  
DAMIAN MCNAMARA
Keyword(s):  
D Dimer ◽  

1994 ◽  
Vol 72 (01) ◽  
pp. 089-091 ◽  
Author(s):  
P de Moerloose ◽  
Ph Minazio ◽  
G Reber ◽  
A Perrier ◽  
H Bounameaux

SummaryD-dimer (DD), when measured by a quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), is a valuable test to exclude venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, DD ELISA technique is not appropriate for emergency use and the available agglutination latex assays are not sensitive enough to be used as an alternative to rule out the diagnosis of VTE. Latex assays could still be used as screening tests. We tested this hypothesis by comparing DD levels measured by ELISA and latex assays in 334 patients suspected of pulmonary embolism. All but one patient with a positive (DD ≥500 ng/ml) latex assay had DD levels higher than 500 ng/ml with the ELISA assay. Accordingly, ELISA technique could be restricted to patients with a negative result in latex assay. This two-step approach would have spared about 50% of ELISA in our cohort. In conclusion, our data indicate that a latex test can be used as a first diagnostic step to rule out pulmonary embolism provided a negative result is confirmed by ELISA and the performance of the latex assay used has been assessed properly.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document