Cuff-preserving technique for aortic mechanical artificial valve replacement performed for perivalvular leakage

2010 ◽  
Vol 58 (11) ◽  
pp. 592-594
Author(s):  
Toru Ishizaka ◽  
Hisashi Satoh ◽  
Hiroki Shiomitsu ◽  
Takashi Shibuya ◽  
Hiroto Iwasaki ◽  
...  
1994 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 191-195
Author(s):  
Akio Hirano ◽  
Kouichi Hisatomi ◽  
Eiki Tayama ◽  
Masanori Ohhashi ◽  
Tadashi Isomura ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-16
Author(s):  
Yoshimasa Sakamoto ◽  
Kazuhiro Hashimoto ◽  
Hiroshi Okuyama ◽  
Shinichi Ishii ◽  
Shingo Taguchi ◽  
...  

1988 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yutaka Okita ◽  
Shigehito Miki ◽  
Kenji Kusuhara ◽  
Yuichi Ueda ◽  
Takafumi Tahata ◽  
...  

2022 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiehui Li ◽  
Shuiyun Wang ◽  
Hansong Sun ◽  
Jianping Xu ◽  
Chao Dong ◽  
...  

Background:This study aimed to evaluate the clinical and surgical characteristics of patients who required reoperation after mechanical mitral valve replacement (MVR).Methods:We retrospectively identified 204 consecutive patients who underwent reoperation after mechanical MVR between 2009 and 2018. Patients were categorized according the reason for reoperation (perivalvular leakage, thrombus formation, or pannus formation). The patients' medical and surgical records were studied carefully and the rates of in-hospital complications were calculated.Results:The mean age was 51±12 years and 44% of the patients were male. The reasons for reoperation were perivalvular leakage (117 patients), thrombus formation (35 patients), and pannus formation (52 patients). The most common positions for perivalvular leakage were at the 6–10 o'clock positions (proportions of ≥25% for each hour position). Most patients had an interval of >10 years between the original MVR and reoperation. The most common reoperation procedure was re-do MVR (157 patients), and 155 of these patients underwent concomitant cardiac procedures. There were 10 in-hospital deaths and 32 patients experienced complications. The 10-year survival rate was 82.2 ± 3.9% in general, and the group of lowest rate was patients with PVL (77.5 ± 5.2%). The independent risk factors were “male” (4.62, 95% CI 1.57–13.58, P = 0.005) and “Hb <9g/dL before redo MV operation” (3.45, 95% CI 1.13–10.49, P = 0.029).Conclusion:Perivalvular leakage was the most common reason for reoperation after mechanical MVR, with a low survival rate in long term follow-up relatively.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document