Electrical stimulation of the carotid sinus for the treatment of resistant hypertension

2006 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 420-424 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. D. Filippone ◽  
James A. Sloand ◽  
Karl A. Illig ◽  
John D. Bisognano
Hypertension ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 64 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pedro L Katayama ◽  
Jaci A Castania ◽  
Rubens Fazan ◽  
Helio C Salgado

The mechanisms involved in Baroreflex Activation Therapy (BAT) in patients with resistant hypertension require better understanding. It was shown that electrical stimulation of the carotid sinus (ESCS), in conscious carotid body-denervated rats, caused bradycardia and greater hypotensive response when compared with intact control rats. In the current study the activation of the chemoreceptors due to ESCS, in conscious rats, was examined in the absence of the carotid baroreceptors. Wistar rats with unilateral denervation of the right carotid chemoreceptors were divided into three groups: 1) control (CONT, n=7); 2) bilateral carotid chemoreceptor denervation (CD, n=7); 3) unilateral denervation of the left carotid baroreceptors (BD, n=4). Under ketamine/xylazine anesthesia bipolar electrodes were implanted around the left carotid sinus combined with arterial and venous catheters into the femoral vessels. On the next day, after basal hemodynamic recordings, the animals received three ESCS (5V, 1 ms) with 15 Hz, 30 Hz and 60 Hz, applied randomly for 20s. Carotid chemoreceptors denervation was confirmed by the lack of hemodynamic responses after the administration of KCN (40 μg iv). The efficacy of left carotid baroreceptor denervation was confirmed by the absence of hemodynamic responses to changes in the left carotid sinus pressure ranging from 60 mmHg to 180 mmHg. The results showed that ESCS was efficient to cause greater hypotensive responses in the CD as compared with the CONT group at 60 Hz (-37 ± 6 vs -19 ± 3 mmHg) and to cause hypertensive responses in the BD group at 30 Hz and 60 Hz (15 ± 2 and 19 ± 2 mmHg). ESCS caused no alteration of the heart rate in the CONT but caused significant bradycardia in the CD group at 30 Hz and 60 Hz (-31 ± 11 and -35 ± 12 bpm) and in the BD group at 15 Hz, 30 Hz and 60 Hz (-38 ± 6, -37 ± 6 and -34 ± 4 bpm). These data demonstrated that carotid chemoreceptor activation in the absence of the carotid baroreceptors caused hypertension and bradycardia, indicating that when the baroreceptors are intact, the chemoreceptors blunt the hypotensive response caused by ESCS. These findings provide important information for the clinical studies using BAT in patients with resistant hypertension and/or heart failure.


2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (10) ◽  
pp. 1057-1067 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gean Domingos-Souza ◽  
Fernanda Machado Santos-Almeida ◽  
César Arruda Meschiari ◽  
Nathanne S. Ferreira ◽  
Camila A. Pereira ◽  
...  

1991 ◽  
Vol 70 (6) ◽  
pp. 2539-2550 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. A. Hopp ◽  
J. L. Seagard ◽  
J. Bajic ◽  
E. J. Zuperku

Respiratory responses arising from both chemical stimulation of vascularly isolated aortic body (AB) and carotid body (CB) chemoreceptors and electrical stimulation of aortic nerve (AN) and carotid sinus nerve (CSN) afferents were compared in the anesthetized dog. Respiratory reflexes were measured as changes in inspiratory duration (TI), expiratory duration (TE), and peak averaged phrenic nerve activity (PPNG). Tonic AN and AB stimulations shortened TI and TE with no change in PPNG, while tonic CSN and CB stimulations shortened TE, increased PPNG, and transiently lengthened TI. Phasic AB and AN stimulations throughout inspiration shortened TI with no changes in PPNG or the following TE; however, similar phasic stimulations of the CB and CSN increased both TI and PPNG and decreased the following TE. Phasic AN stimulation during expiration decreased TE and the following TI with no change in PPNG. Similar stimulations of the CB and CSN decreased TE; however, the following TI and PPNG were increased. These findings differ from those found in the cat and suggest that aortic chemoreceptors affect mainly phase timing, while carotid chemoreceptors affect both timing and respiratory drive.


1969 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 589-596 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor Parsonnet ◽  
Edwin L. Rothfeld ◽  
K. Venkata Raman ◽  
George H. Myers

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document