Irritable bowel syndrome: Bacterial overgrowth—What’s known and what to do

2007 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 328-337
Author(s):  
Mark Pimentel ◽  
Sheila Lezcano
2010 ◽  
Vol 138 (5) ◽  
pp. S-382
Author(s):  
Savio Reddymasu ◽  
Bejnamin Alsop ◽  
Tuba Esfandyari ◽  
Melissa M. Oropeza-Vail ◽  
Sandra L. Sostarich ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 627-634 ◽  
Author(s):  
Konstantinos Leventogiannis ◽  
Paraskevas Gkolfakis ◽  
Georgios Spithakis ◽  
Aikaterini Tsatali ◽  
Aikaterini Pistiki ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 111-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Z.F. Ma ◽  
N. Yusof ◽  
N. Hamid ◽  
R.M. Lawenko ◽  
W.M.Z. Wan Mohammad ◽  
...  

Individuals in a community who developed irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) after major floods have significant mental health impairment. We aimed to determine if Bifidobacterium infantis M-63 was effective in improving symptoms, psychology and quality of life measures in flood-affected individuals with IBS and if the improvement was mediated by gut microbiota changes. Design was non-randomised, open-label, controlled before-and-after. Of 53 participants, 20 with IBS were given B. infantis M-63 (1×109 cfu/sachet/day) for three months and 33 were controls. IBS symptom severity scale, hospital anxiety and depression scale, SF-36 Questionnaire, hydrogen breath testing for small intestinal bacterial overgrowth and stools for 16S rRNA metagenomic analysis were performed before and after intervention. 11 of 20 who were given probiotics (M-63) and 20 of 33 controls completed study as per-protocol. Mental well-being was improved with M-63 vs controls for full analysis (P=0.03) and per-protocol (P=0.01) populations. Within-group differences were observed for anxiety and bodily pain (both P=0.04) in the M-63 per-protocol population. Lower ratio of Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes was observed with M-63 vs controls (P=0.01) and the lower ratio was correlated with higher post-intervention mental score (P=0.04). B. infantis M-63 is probably effective in improving mental health of victims who developed IBS after floods and this is maybe due to restoration of microbial balance and the gut-brain axis. However, our conclusion must be interpreted within the context of limited sample size. The study was retrospectively registered on 12 October 2017 and the Trial Registration Number (TRN) was NCT03318614.


2020 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 175628481989753 ◽  
Author(s):  
William D. Chey ◽  
Eric D. Shah ◽  
Herbert L. DuPont

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common functional gastrointestinal disorder with a multifactorial pathophysiology. The gut microbiota differs between patients with IBS and healthy individuals. After a bout of acute gastroenteritis, postinfection IBS may result in up to approximately 10% of those affected. Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) is more common in patients with IBS than in healthy individuals, and eradication of SIBO with systemic antibiotics has decreased symptoms of IBS in some patients with IBS and SIBO. The nonsystemic (i.e. low oral bioavailability) antibiotic rifaximin is indicated in the United States and Canada for the treatment of adults with IBS with diarrhea (IBS-D). The efficacy and safety of 2-week single and repeat courses of rifaximin have been demonstrated in randomized, placebo-controlled studies of adults with IBS. Rifaximin is widely thought to exert its beneficial clinical effects in IBS-D through manipulation of the gut microbiota. However, current studies indicate that rifaximin induces only modest effects on the gut microbiota of patients with IBS-D, suggesting that the efficacy of rifaximin may involve other mechanisms. Indeed, preclinical data reveal a potential role for rifaximin in the modulation of inflammatory cytokines and intestinal permeability, but these two findings have not yet been examined in the context of clinical studies. The mechanism of action of rifaximin in IBS is likely multifactorial, and further study is needed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document