Conflict of interest policies in science and medical journals: Editorial practices and author disclosures

2001 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 205-218 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheldon Krimsky ◽  
L. S. Rothenberg
2019 ◽  
Vol 131 (1) ◽  
pp. 264-270 ◽  
Author(s):  
Madeleine P. de Lotbiniere-Bassett ◽  
Jay Riva-Cambrin ◽  
Patrick J. McDonald

OBJECTIVEAn increasing amount of funding in neurosurgery research comes from industry, which may create a conflict of interest (COI) and the potential to bias results. The reporting and handling of COIs have become difficult, particularly as explicit policies themselves and definitions thereof continue to vary between medical journals. In this study, the authors sought to evaluate the prevalence and comprehensiveness of COI policies among leading neurosurgical journals.METHODSThe authors conducted a cross-sectional study of publicly available online disclosure policies in the 20 highest-ranking neurosurgical journals, as determined by Google Scholar Metrics, in July 2016.RESULTSOverall, 89.5% of the highest-impact neurosurgical journals included COI policy statements. Ten (53%) journals requested declaration of nonfinancial conflicts, while 2 journals specifically set a time period for COIs. Sixteen journals required declaration from the corresponding author, 13 from all authors, 6 from reviewers, and 5 from editors. Four journals were included in the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) list of publications that follow the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals (currently known as Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals). Five journal policies included COI declaration verification, management, or enforcement. The neurosurgery journals with more comprehensive COI policies were significantly more likely to have higher h5-indices (p = 0.003) and higher impact factors (p = 0.01).CONCLUSIONSIn 2016, the majority of, but not all, high-impact neurosurgical journals had publically available COI disclosure policies. Policy inclusiveness and comprehensiveness varied substantially across neurosurgical journals, but COI comprehensiveness was associated with other established markers of individual journals’ favorability and influence, such as impact factor and h5-index.


1970 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 73-76
Author(s):  
Lorraine E Ferris ◽  
Robert H Fletcher

("This Editorial may appear in other medical and biomedical journals whose editors are members of WAME." Note toWAME Members: This editorial is being offered for publication in WAME member journals at the discretion oftheir editors. WAME retains copyright.)DOI: 10.3126/jnps.v30i2.3447J. Nepal Paediatr. Soc. May-August, 2010 Vol 30(2) 73-76


2013 ◽  
Vol 52 (190) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kusal K. Das ◽  
Tejaswini Vallabha ◽  
Jaydeb Ray ◽  
P.S.N. Murthy

Background: There are several vested interest lies on research publication hence the editorial policy is the sole important factor to control and regulate ethical publications in medical sciences especially on ‘conflict of interest’ issue.Aim: the study was aimed to assess on awareness of ‘conflict of interest’ issue in medical research and publication among the editorial staff, peer reviewers and authors of Indian medical journals.Methods: 61 authors who have published research articles recently in Indian medical journals (2008-2012), 56 peer reviewers who reviewed the manuscripts during same period and 35 editorial board members of various Indian medical journals were assessed by questionnaire and telephone interview regarding their understanding and knowledge on ‘conflict of interest’ issue for ethical publication.Results: Only 12% of the authors knew about the ‘conflict of interest’ issue and 19% of the medical authors have just heard about it! Out of 12% of authors who knew ‘conflict of interest’ issue only 5% provided that statement to the journals. Among the peer reviewers only 30% knew about ‘conflict of interest’ of which 91.5% stated that they do not bother about this issue while reviewing the manuscripts! But interestingly 75% of the peer reviewers confessed that they had a bias on the topics written by their friends or students! Among the editorial board members of Indian medical journals only 25% have any idea on ‘conflict of interest issue’.Conclusions: Results clearly shows poor understanding of ‘conflict of interest’ like important ethical issue among Indian medical scientists or journals.Keywords: authors; conflict of Interest; editorial members; peer reviewers; Indian Medical Journals.


2015 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 78-81
Author(s):  
Chris Johnstone ◽  
Peter Grant ◽  
Liljana Sokolova ◽  
Rajko Igić ◽  
Peter McLaren ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 488-499 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Steinbrook ◽  
Bernard Lo

Physicians and patients rely on medical journals as trusted sources of medical information. Unfortunately, in multiple instances conflicts of interest have undermined the credibility of the medical literature.The primary sources of conflict of interest at medical journals are authors, reviewers, editors (a category that includes editorial staff, editorial boards, and other advisory groups), and journals (a category that includes owners and publishers). Consider these examples.


Neurosurgery ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 66 (4) ◽  
pp. 629-630 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lorraine E. Ferris ◽  
Robert H. Fletcher

JAMA ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 317 (17) ◽  
pp. 1768 ◽  
Author(s):  
Phil Fontanarosa ◽  
Howard Bauchner

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document