Flow stabilization and coating thickness reduction through use of multi-slot air-knife in gas jet wiping

Author(s):  
A. Yahyaee Soufiani ◽  
J. R. McDermid ◽  
A. N. Hrymak ◽  
F. E. Goodwin
2016 ◽  
Vol 24 (01) ◽  
pp. 1750010
Author(s):  
CHENGREN BAO ◽  
YONGLIN KANG ◽  
YAN LI

In hot-dip galvanizing process, air jet wiping control is so crucial to determine the coating thickness and uniformity of the zinc layer on the steel strip. A numerical simulation of gas-jet wiping in hot-dip galvanizing was conducted to minimize the occurrence of edge over coating (EOC). The causes of EOC were identified by contrasting and analyzing the airflow fields on the strip edge with and without a baffle. The factors influencing the airflow field on the strip edge during the change in the gap between the baffle and the strip edge were also analyzed. The effect of the distance between the air knife and the strip was evaluated. Technological parameters with on-site guidance role were obtained by combining them with the actual production to elucidate the role of the baffle in restraining the occurrence of EOC. The uniform distribution of pressure and coating thickness on the strip is achieved when the distance of the baffle from the strip edge is about 0.3 times of the jetting distance.


2020 ◽  
Vol 60 (5) ◽  
pp. 1040-1051
Author(s):  
Ali Yahyaee soufiani ◽  
Joseph Robert Mcdermid ◽  
Andrew Nick Hrymak ◽  
Frank Erik Goodwin

Fluids ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 136
Author(s):  
Pranjal Bathla ◽  
John Kennedy

The use of porous coatings is one of the passive flow control methods used to reduce turbulence, noise and vibrations generated due to fluid flow. Porous coatings for flow stabilization have potential for a light-weight, cost-effective, and customizable solution. The design and performance of a structured porous coating depend on multiple control parameters like lattice size, strut thickness, lattice structure/geometry, etc. This study investigated the suitability of MSLA 3D printers to manufacture porous coatings based on unit cell designs to optimize porous lattices for flow control behind a cylinder. The Reynolds number used was 6.1×104–1.5×105 and the flow measurements were taken using a hotwire probe. Different experiment sets were conducted for single cylinder with varying control parameters to achieve best performing lattice designs. It was found that lattice structures with higher porosity produced lower turbulence intensity in the wake of the cylinder. However, for constant porosity lattice structures, there was negligible difference in turbulence and mean wake velocity levels. Coating thickness did not have a linear relationship with turbulence reduction, suggesting an optimal thickness value. For constant porosity coatings, cell count in coating thickness did not influence the turbulence or mean wake velocity. Partial coating designs like helical and spaced coatings had comparable performance to that of a full coating. MSLA printers were found capable of manufacturing thin and complex porous lattices.


2009 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 262-267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tae-Seok Cho ◽  
Young-Doo Kwon ◽  
Soon-Bum Kwon
Keyword(s):  

2012 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 70-78 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan Zhang ◽  
Qi-peng Cui ◽  
Fu-qun Shao ◽  
Jun-sheng Wang ◽  
Hong-yang Zhao
Keyword(s):  

2014 ◽  
Vol 633-634 ◽  
pp. 180-183
Author(s):  
Fang Fang ◽  
Li Xin Wang ◽  
Shao Yun Zhou ◽  
Jiang Wen Li

A series of air knife flow rate were conducted by a hot dipping process simulator in laboratory to study its effect on coating weight and thickness. The research results show that, when the experimental steel were immersed for 3.5s in a Zn-0.24%Al zinc bath, with atmosphere of N2-10%H2 and dew point-60°C in the whole simulation, air knife flow rate (FR) was a key factor for coating surface quality. When FR was precisely controlled by the simulator from 200~500 l/min, the coating weight and thickness decreased significantly from 159.68 to 56.19 g/m2 and 17.45 to 7.84 μm. In which the decreasing line was more obvious when FR increased from 300 to 400 l/min, that the coating thickness had a dramatic decreasing from 18.08 to 11.07μm.


1984 ◽  
Vol 45 (C2) ◽  
pp. C2-33-C2-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. A. Sewell ◽  
I. D. Hall ◽  
G. Love ◽  
J. P. Partridge ◽  
V. D. Scott

Metrologiya ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. 3-16
Author(s):  
V.S. Sekatsky ◽  
O.A. Gavrilova ◽  
N.V. Merzlikina ◽  
V.N. Morgun Morgun
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document