The impact of extended lymph node dissection versus neoadjuvant therapy with limited lymph node dissection on biochemical recurrence in high-risk prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional analysis

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Takuma Narita ◽  
Takuya Koie ◽  
Teppei Ookubo ◽  
Koji Mitsuzuka ◽  
Shintaro Narita ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. e543-e543
Author(s):  
Takuya Koie ◽  
Teppei Ookubo ◽  
Koji Mitsuzuka ◽  
Shintaro Narita ◽  
Takamitsu Inoue ◽  
...  

e543 Background: The optimal treatment for high-risk prostate cancer (Pca) remains to be established. We previously reported favorable biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS) in high-risk Pca patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy comprising a luteinizing-hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist plus low-dose estramustine phosphate (EMP) (LHRH+EMP) followed by radical prostatectomy (RP). The aim of this study was to assess whether neoadjuvant LHRH+EMP confers an oncological benefit for high-risk Pca compared to extended lymph node dissection (e-PLND). Methods: The Michinoku Urological Cancer Study Group database contained the data of 2403 consecutive Pca patients treated with RP at 4 institutes between March 2000 and December 2014. In the e-PLND group, we identified 238 high-risk Pca patients who underwent RP and e-PLND, with lymphatic tissue removal around the obturator and the external iliac regions, and hypogastric lymph node dissection. The neoadjuvant therapy with limited PLND (l-PLND) group included 280 high-risk Pca patients who underwent RP and removal of the obturator node chain between September 2005 and June 2014 at Hirosaki University. The neoadjuvant LHRH+EMP therapy included the administration of 280 mg/day of LHRH and EMP for 6 months before RP. The outcome measure was BRFS. Results: The 5-year BRFS rates for the neoadjuvant therapy with l-PLND group and e-PLND group were 84.9% and 54.7%, respectively ( P < 0.0001). The operative time was significantly longer in the e-PLND group compared to that of the neoadjuvant therapy with l-PLND group. Grade 3/4 surgery-related complications were not identified in both groups. Conclusions: Although the present study was not randomized, neoadjuvant LHRH+EMP therapy followed by RP might reduce the risk of biochemical recurrence.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhen Zhou ◽  
Shi-Yong Xin ◽  
Ting-Shuai Zhai ◽  
Liang Jin ◽  
Xiang Liu ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective Aimed to evaluate the therapeutic effect of pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) on survival and determine the predictors of lymph node involvement (LNI) in patients with intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) treated with Radical Prostatectomy (RP).Methods 75,583 patients undergoing RP with or without PLND between 2010 and 2016 were extracted from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results database. We performed 1:1 propensity score matching due to potential differences according to the 2 cohorts. Cox regression models (CRMs) were used to test the effect of PLND on overall mortality (OM) and cancer-specific mortality (CSM). Logistic regression analysis was used to investigate the predictors of LNI.Results The propensity-score-matched cohort includes 52,314 patients with or without PLND. Kaplan Meier analysis confirmed that patients receiving PLND had a poorer prognosis than those without PLND (P<0.05). But the multivariable CRMs after adjustment showed that PLND was not an independent predictor for OM and CSM (P>0.05). According to multivariable CRMs, patients with locally advanced PCa in whom PLND was performed had higher OM (HR 1.67, CI 1.36-2.06) and CSM (HR 2.26, CI 1.16-3.12) risks compared to patients without PLND (p < 0.001). Compared to patients with intermediate-risk PCa, there was a higher risk of LNI in patients with locally advanced PCa (OR 16.82, 95% CI 5.05-56.06, P<0.001).Conclusions In the intermediate- or high-risk localised PCa, there was no significant difference in survival outcome in patients with or without PLND. Locally advanced PCa was significantly associated with LNI but can’t benefit from PLND.


2016 ◽  
Vol 195 (4S) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lorenzo Tosco ◽  
Sofie Isebaert ◽  
Evelyne Lerut ◽  
Wouter Everaerts ◽  
Maarten Albersen ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 121 (3) ◽  
pp. 421-427 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giorgio Gandaglia ◽  
Emanuele Zaffuto ◽  
Nicola Fossati ◽  
Marco Bandini ◽  
Nazareno Suardi ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document